Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope of Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas:

1. Epidemiology
2. Public Health
3. Medicine
4. Life science
5. Entomology
6. Veterinary Medicine
7. Drug Discovery
8. One Health

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process / Policy

All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (e-ISSN:2615-4854) must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software. 

The research article submitted to this journal will be single-blind peer-reviewed at least by 1 (one) expert reviewer. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Duration of review between 4-8 weeks. After that, the article will be sent to the author for editing with duration a month. 

Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (e-ISSN:2615-4854) is scheduled for publication in February and August (2 issue a year).  It is electronically published via journal website (https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jekk/index).

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (e-ISSN:2615-4854) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

The journal uses the archiver services to create distributed filing systems among participating libraries and enables them to create journal archives for conservation and restoration purposes. 

• PKP Publication Network (PKP PN). See info.
• Portico archive

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (JEKK) committed to ethical behavior in all aspects of scholarly publishing. Please ensure your paper meets the following ethical criteria:

• An authorship and conflicts of interest statement.    The authors list is complete and correct. Any and all potential and actual conflics of interest should also be listed
• The data have not published elsewhere. Data publishes in another paper, including in a paper in another language, may not published again.
• No. portions oof text are direcly copied from other sources. All manuscripts undergo a plagiarism test before they are sent out for review.
• A copyright transfer agreement. In the event that your manuscript is accepted for publication in the JEKK, you are required to transfer all copyright ownership in the JEKK.
• An ethics statement. Articles covering the use of human or animal samples in research, or human or animal experiments must be accompanied by a letter of approval from the relevant review committee or authorities.
• Articles where human subjects can be identified in descriptions, photographs or pedigrees must be accompanied by a signed statement of informed consent to publish (in print and online) the descriptions, photographs and pedigrees from each subject who can be identified.
• Copyright permission. If you have reproduced or adapted material from other copyrighted sources, the letter(s) of permission from the copyright holder(s) to reproduce or adapt the copyrighted sources must be supplied. Otherwise, such material must be removed from your manuscript.

Ethical Approval of Studies and Informed Consent

• For human or animal experimental investigations, appropriate institutional review board or ethics committee approval is required, and such approval should be stated in the methods section of the manuscript. For those investigators who do not have formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed (World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects).
• For investigation of human subjects, state explicitly in the methods section of the manuscript that informed consent was obtained from all participating adult subjects and from parents or legal guardians for minors or incapacitated adults, together with the manner in which informed consent was obtained.

Plagiarism Statement

All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism content. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarity (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check for similarity). The Editor will also check the similarity of the manuscript in this journal using Turnitin or iThenticate software. (Statement of Originality)

Alleged Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, conducting, or reviewing research and writing articles by the authors, or in reporting the results of the research. If the author is found to be involved in research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, the Editor is responsible for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of alleged misconduct, the Editor and Editorial Board will use COPE best practices to help them resolve complaints and deal fairly with misconduct. This will include an investigation of the allegations by the Editor. Submitted manuscripts found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where published papers are found to contain such misconduct, a retraction may be published and will link to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegations and assessing whether they are consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individual alleging misconduct has any relevant conflicts of interest. If scientific misconduct or other substantial research misconduct is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all co-authors, is asked to provide a detailed response. Once the responses are received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be sought. For cases where misconduct is unlikely, clarification, additional analysis, or both, published as a letter to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article, are sufficient.

Institutions are expected to conduct appropriate and thorough investigations of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding promptly to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on the evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and withdrawals, the journal will continue to fulfill its responsibility to ensure the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Journal of Community Health Epidemiology is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Complaints and Appeals

The Journal of Community Health Epidemiology will have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. Complaints will be clarified to the respected person in connection with the complaint case. The scope of the complaint covers anything related to the journal's business processes, namely the editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editors/reviewers, peer review manipulation, etc. Complaint cases will be processed in accordance with the COPE guidelines. Complaints should be sent via email to: jekk.undip@gmail.com

Fairness

An editor at all times evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the editor.

Content License

 Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

You are free to:

• Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
• Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
• for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

• Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
• No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

• You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
• No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Article Processing Charge

Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (e-ISSN:2615-4854) is an open access journal. Article processing fee is Rp. 500,000 paid after there is certainty that submitted papers are accepted for publication. While the submission and review process is free of charge. Readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge.

Indexing

Articles published in Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas (eISSN: 2615-4854) have appeared in the following indexes:

• Google Scholar
• Dimensions

CrossMark Applying on JEKK

Crossmark

Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.

What is Crossmark?

CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and may also provide additional publication record information about the document.