skip to main content

Negative correlation of Modified Sperm Stress Test with Leukocyte in Sperm but not with the sperm concentration and motility

1Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

2Andrology Specialist Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Received: 19 Jul 2022; Revised: 16 Aug 2022; Accepted: 22 Aug 2022; Available online: 31 Aug 2022; Published: 31 Aug 2022.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Sperm analysis is an initial detection procedure of male infertility recommended by the WHO. Sperm motility as one of the important parameters in sperm analysis has a close correlation with various determinants of male infertility and the success of Assissted Reproductive Technology (ART). Several laboratory assays were carried out as a complement to sperm analysis to describe the sperm ability for fertilization. One of the assays was the modified sperm stress test (MOST) to predict oocyte fertilization in In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Objective: This study aimed to assess the correlation between MOST ratio and sperm parameters in infertile men.

Methods: This study is a descriptive-analytic study by taking sperm analysis and MOST data from 864 males with infertility problems who went to an infertility clinic, Sadewa IVF, Yogyakarta, Indonesia from May 2015 to November 2020.

Results: The mean sperm volume and concentration of the 864 patients were 3.04 mL and 35.74 x 106 / mL respectively. The mean forward motility and normal morphology were 47.93% and 2.07% respectively. The mean leukocyte cell number was 0.84%, and the mean MOST ratio was 0.51. The results showed a positive correlation between sperm concentration (r = 0.235) and motility (r = 0.302) with the MOST ratio. Meanwhile, the leukocyte parameter negatively correlated with the MOST ratio (r = -0.076) and no correlation between other sperm parameters to the MOST ratio.

Conclusion:

There is a positive correlation between sperm concentration and motility with the MOST ratio, and a negative correlation between the number of leukocytes and the MOST ratio. This result supports the findings of previous studies regarding the importance of sperm motility examination in the success of ART. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the MOST in male infertility patients with the big sample size.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Male infertility; Sperm analysis; Fertilization; Modified sperm stress test

Article Metrics:

  1. Babakhanzadeh E, Nazari M, Ghasemifar S, Khodadadian A. Some of the Factors Involved in Male Infertility: A Prospective Review. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:29-41. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S241099
  2. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, Lamb DJ, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline PART II. J Urol. 2021;205(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001521
  3. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44261
  4. Kumar N, Singh AK. Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: A review of literature. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8(4):191-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.170370
  5. Alvarez JG, Minaretzis D, Barrett CB, Mortola JF, IE T. The sperm stress test: a novel test that predicts pregnancy in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):400-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58107-2
  6. Calamera JC, Doncel GF, Olmedo SB, Kolm P, Acosta AA. Modified sperm stress test: a simple assay that predicts sperm-related abnormal in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(9):2484-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2484
  7. Le MT, Nguyen TAT, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen VT, Le DD, et al. Does sperm DNA fragmentation correlate with semen parameters? Reprod. Med. Biol. 2019;18(4):390-6. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12297
  8. Dcunha R, Hussein RS, Ananda H, Kumari S, Adiga SK, Kannan N, et al. Current Insights and Latest Updates in Sperm Motility and Associated Applications in Assisted Reproduction. Reprod sci. 2022;29(1):7-25. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00408-y
  9. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231-45. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048
  10. Vasan SS. Semen analysis and sperm function tests: How much to test? Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):41-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.78424
  11. Kızılay F, Altay B. Sperm function tests in clinical practice. Turk J Urol. 2017;43(4):393-400. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.96646
  12. Oehninger S, Franken DR, Ombelet W. Sperm functional tests. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.044
  13. Anbari F, Halvaei I, Nabi A, Ghazali S, Khalili MA, Johansson L. The quality of sperm preparation medium affects the motility, viability, and DNA integrity of human spermatozoa. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(4):254-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.197691
  14. Khatun A, Rahman MS, Pang M. Clinical assessment of the male fertility. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(2):179-91. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.2.179
  15. Zheng J, Lu Y, Qu X, Wang P, Zhao L, Gao M, et al. Decreased Sperm Motility Retarded ICSI Fertilization Rate in Severe Oligozoospermia but Good-Quality Embryo Transfer Had Achieved the Prospective Clinical Outcomes. PloS one. 2016;11(9):e0163524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163524
  16. Pratap H, Hottigoudar SY, Nichanahalli KS, Rajendran S, Bheemanathi HS. Sperm DNA Integrity in Leukocytospermia and Its Association with Seminal Adenosine Deaminase. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12(3):182-8. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_1_19
  17. Tremellen K, Tunc O. Macrophage activity in semen is significantly correlated with sperm quality in infertile men. Int J Androl. 2010;33(6):823-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01037.x
  18. Samplaski MK, Dimitromanolakis A, Lo KC, Grober ED, Mullen B, Garbens A, et al. The relationship between sperm viability and DNA fragmentation rates. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:42. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0035-y
  19. Brahem S, Jellad S, Ibala S, Saad A, Mehdi M. DNA fragmentation status in patients with necrozoospermia. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012;58(6):319-23. DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2012.710869
  20. Sivanarayana T, Ravi Krishna C, Jaya Prakash G, Krishna KM, Madan K, Sudhakar G, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation assay by sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD): correlation between DNA fragmentation and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod med biol. 2014;13(2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s12522-013-0168-7
  21. Moubasher A, Sayed H, Mosaad E, Mahmoud A, Farag F, Taha EA. Impact of leukocytospermia on sperm dynamic motility parameters, DNA and chromosomal integrity. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(4):470-5. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1724
  22. Hatchell EC, Colley SM, Beveridge DJ, Epis MR, Stuart LM, Giles KM, et al. SLIRP, a small SRA binding protein, is a nuclear receptor corepressor. Mol cell. 2006;22(5):657-68. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.024
  23. Colley SM, Wintle L, Searles R, Russell V, Firman RC, Smith S, et al. Loss of the nuclear receptor corepressor SLIRP compromises male fertility. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e70700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070700

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.