skip to main content

The Ambiguities of Iconic Design: Mo Modern Art Museum by Daniel Libeskind

Department of Architectural Fundamentals, Theory and Art, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

Open Access Copyright 2019 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The article is focused on the cultural phenomena of architectural iconism that has become globally widespread due to the continuous pressure of ongoing economic, ideological and cultural globalisation and the reigning interests of the web of building industry that appropriates architectural design for its own financial purposes as well as local political stakeholders who often seek to replicate the success of previous internationally renowned iconic buildings by aspiring to the status of world-class cities. While discussing the global and local cultural contexts in which the so-called ‘Bilbao effect’ triggered the current pursuit of iconic buildings, the author of the article analyses the much publicized recent example of iconic architecture in Eastern Europe – the MO Modern Art Museum that was designed by Daniel Libeskind and opened in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania in 2018 on the site of an abandoned and eventually demolished cinema in the vicinity of the historical Old Quarters. It is argued that despite of publicity and largely overcooked praises of international architectural media, the museum’s architectural design remains an example of ‘signatory architecture’ that largely ignores the aesthetics of its local urban environment and peculiarities of local historical and cultural context. It is suggested that that despite of claims of being contextual, in fact the building is not and on the contrary: it exhibits most of the aesthetics features that plaque iconic buildings in various localities on different continents.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: starchitecture, iconic buildings, Daniel Libeskind, aesthetics, Genius Loci

Article Metrics:

  1. Alexander. C, et at al. (1977) A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Frampton, K. (2005). The work of architecture in the age of commodification. Harvard Design Magazine, 23, 1-5
  3. Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Murray, C.B. (2011). Designer buildings: estimating the economic value of ‘signature’ architecture. Environment and Planning , 43, 166-184. Doi: 1068/a43270
  4. Jencks, C. (2005). The Iconic Building: The Power of Enigma. London: Frances Lincoln
  5. Heathcote, E. (2017). Age of ‘starchitect’. Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/d064d57c-df01-11e6-86ac-f253db7791c6
  6. McNeil, D. (2000). McGuggenisation? National identity and globalisation in the basque country, 19 (4), 473-494
  7. Millais, M. (2009) Exploding the Myths of Modern Architecture. London: Frances Lioncoln
  8. Murphy, D. (2012) The Failure of Architecture. Winchester and Washington: Zero Books,
  9. Lubell, S. (2018) Studio Libeskind designs a bold yet contextual new art museum for Vilnius (15 November 2018). https://www.metropolismag.com/architecture/studio-libeskind-vilnius-mo-museum/
  10. Ponzini D. (2014). The values of starchitecture: commodification of architectural design in contemporary cities. Organisational Aesthetics. 3 (1), 10-18
  11. Salingaros N. A., Mehaffy M. (2015). Design for a Living Planet. Portland: Sustasis
  12. Salingaros. N. A., Samalavičius A. (2013). Revisiting and rethinking contemporary urban design, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37 (3), 161-164
  13. Salingaros N.A. (2017) Why do we need to “grasp“ our surroundings: object affordance and prehension in architecture, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41 (3), doi: 10.3846/20297955.2017.1376003
  14. Salingaros N. A. (2017). Design Patterns and Living Architecture. Portland: Sustasis
  15. Samalavičius, A. ed. (2017). Rethinking Modernism and the Built Environment. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  16. Scruton, R. (1979) The Aesthetics of Architecture. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  17. Sklair, L. (2006). Do cities need architectural icons? Urban Studies, 43 (10), 1899-1918
  18. Sklair. L. (2017). The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities and capitalist Globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  19. Sudjic, D. (2005). How the Rich and Powerful Shape the World. London and New York: Allen Lane
  20. Trilupaityte, S. (2009). Guggenheim’s global travel and the appropriation of a national avant-garde for cultural planning in Vilnius. International Journal of Cultural policy, 15 (1), 123-138

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.