DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v1i2.4215

A Spatial Study of Waisai Central Business District, in response to Raja Ampat’s tourism potential, West Papua

1Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

2Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

3Ministry of Villages; Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2019 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Waisai district in terms of spatial aspects, as an attempt to respond to tourism potential in Raja Ampat with descriptive qualitative methods using a built and architectural environment design approach responding to natural potential. The study successfully concluded that the Waisai District lacked tourism magnets that could attract tourists and support the Raja Ampat tourism sector, and recommended the revitalization of the tourism potential of Waisai city, such as beaches, pedestrian ways, and city parks, hence Raja Ampat can be known for not only its magnificent sea, but also the Waisai’s central business district (CBD).

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: central business district, Waisai, Raja Ampat
Funding: Arifin Kurniawan, CV. Jasa Konsultansi

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Obstacles of Accessibility for the Disabled People in the Campus 1 UPGRIS The Changes of House’s Spatial Caused by The User’s Religiosity in Pondok Indah Housing Estate Semarang Space Function and Shape of Balai Adat in Koto Sentajo Traditional Village More recent articles
  1. Astiti, N. K. A. (2016). (Studi Kasus Sumber Daya Arkeologi di Provinsi Papua) (Optimizing Tourisme Attractions for Cultural Endurance: A Case Study of Archaeological Resources in Papua) Ni Komang Ayu Astiti. Jurnal Papua, 8(2), 161–178
  2. Ching, F. D. K. (2012). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. Wiley. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GryqqV58cXcC
  3. Firmandhani, S. W., Setioko, B., & Setyowati, E. (2013). Faktor Pembentuk Persepsi Ruang Komunal Di Pemukiman Nelayan (Studi Kasus: Pemukiman Nelayan Tambak Mulyo Semarang). Teknik, 34(2), 95–102
  4. Fu, F., Chen, Z., Liu, W., & Han, D. (2019). Study on the Tourism Spatial Structure of Dujiangyan City from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization Strategy. In IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 218. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012035
  5. Ginting, N., & Sasmita, A. (2018). Developing tourism facilities based on geotourism in Silalahi Village , Geopark Toba Caldera. In IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/
  6. Grigg, N. S. (1988). Infrastructure engineering and management. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Limited. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KxlSAAAAMAAJ
  7. Kim, S. (2018). Playability for Cities Playability for Cities. In ICSADU 2018 IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012002
  8. Setyowati, M. D. (2011). Pemanfaatan Pedestrian Ways di Koridor Komersial di Koridor Jalan Pemuda Kota Magelang. Jurnal RUAS, 15(1), 13–22
  9. Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CEdPAAAAMAAJ

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.