A Spatial Study of Waisai Central Business District, in response to Raja Ampat’s tourism potential, West Papua

*Satriya Wahyu Firmandhani scopus  -  Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
I. Indriastjario scopus  -  Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Retno Susanti  -  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Humaira M. Rahmi  -  Ministry of Villages; Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 23 Jan 2019; Revised: 29 Jan 2019; Accepted: 4 Feb 2019; Published: 27 Mar 2019; Available online: 27 Mar 2019.
Open Access Copyright 2019 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 106 113

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Waisai district in terms of spatial aspects, as an attempt to respond to tourism potential in Raja Ampat with descriptive qualitative methods using a built and architectural environment design approach responding to natural potential. The study successfully concluded that the Waisai District lacked tourism magnets that could attract tourists and support the Raja Ampat tourism sector, and recommended the revitalization of the tourism potential of Waisai city, such as beaches, pedestrian ways, and city parks, hence Raja Ampat can be known for not only its magnificent sea, but also the Waisai’s central business district (CBD).

Keywords
central business district, Waisai, Raja Ampat

Article Metrics:

  1. Astiti, N. K. A. (2016). (Studi Kasus Sumber Daya Arkeologi di Provinsi Papua) (Optimizing Tourisme Attractions for Cultural Endurance: A Case Study of Archaeological Resources in Papua) Ni Komang Ayu Astiti. Jurnal Papua, 8(2), 161–178.
  2. Ching, F. D. K. (2012). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. Wiley. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GryqqV58cXcC
  3. Firmandhani, S. W., Setioko, B., & Setyowati, E. (2013). Faktor Pembentuk Persepsi Ruang Komunal Di Pemukiman Nelayan (Studi Kasus: Pemukiman Nelayan Tambak Mulyo Semarang). Teknik, 34(2), 95–102.
  4. Fu, F., Chen, Z., Liu, W., & Han, D. (2019). Study on the Tourism Spatial Structure of Dujiangyan City from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization Strategy. In IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 218. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012035
  5. Ginting, N., & Sasmita, A. (2018). Developing tourism facilities based on geotourism in Silalahi Village , Geopark Toba Caldera. In IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/
  6. Grigg, N. S. (1988). Infrastructure engineering and management. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Limited. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KxlSAAAAMAAJ
  7. Kim, S. (2018). Playability for Cities Playability for Cities. In ICSADU 2018 IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012002
  8. Setyowati, M. D. (2011). Pemanfaatan Pedestrian Ways di Koridor Komersial di Koridor Jalan Pemuda Kota Magelang. Jurnal RUAS, 15(1), 13–22.
  9. Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CEdPAAAAMAAJ