skip to main content

Exploring Experience and First Impression in The Liminal Spaces (Case Studies: Corridors and Stairs in Campus Environment)

Faculty of Architecture and Design, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2024 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Humans and their feelings are a 'unique' study in architectural design, such as how humans behave in some spatial settings. Spatial settings are usually defined as an environment that contains specific activities. However, what about transitional spaces or corridors that only serve as intermediaries for 'some walking experience'? The discussion related to liminal space becomes interesting, mainly when studied from the perspective of architectural psychology. This study aims to investigate human experiences and perceptions of liminal spaces, focusing on two locations: the corridors and the stairs at the campus. The research method used is mixed methods, with random samplings collected through an online survey to explore feelings, visuals, and hearing responses to liminal spaces. The study results show that respondents who have experienced being in a liminal space tend to have contra-perceptions of the Alienation theory by Marx, which can be attributed to the habits of the respondents in dealing with that space and their objective nature. Meanwhile, respondents with perceptions that align with Alienation theory tend to be influenced by their feelings and visual imagination. Moreover, respondents whose perceptions aligned with the theory expressed their discomfort and anxiety caused by unconducive room conditions. This research contributes to understanding human experiences and perceptions in liminal spaces with limitations including a small number of respondents and intangible indicators, making it difficult to explain perceptions in nominal terms. Thus, this research can broaden the understanding of architectural psychology and spatial perception.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Liminal space, Alienation, Human behavior, Spatial experience, First impressions

Article Metrics:

  1. Brandberg, J. (2022). Constructing the Liminal: Applying the Japanese concept of Ma to the design of a liminal space. Chalmers University of Technology
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed Methods Procedures. In Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches
  3. Gay, J. L., Cherof, S. A., LaFlamme, C. C., & O’Connor, P. J. (2019). Psychological Aspects of Stair Use: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 16(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1.1177/1559827619870104
  4. Hou, K., Liu, X., Kong, Z., Wang, H., Lu, M., & Hu, S. (2023). Impacts of corridor design: An investigation on occupant perception of corridor forms in elderly facilities. Frontiers of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.002
  5. Josian, M. G., & Gandha, M. V. (2021). Perancangan Arsitektur Ruang Liminal Antara Sebuah Dualisme (Bertani Dan Melaut). Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur (Stupa), 3(1), 1087. https://doi.org/10.24912/stupa.v3i1.10770
  6. Malekpour, M., & Motamedi, S. (2021). The Liminal and the Surreal: The Space of Limbo and Dreams in Luis Bunuel’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9(1), 320–345. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2021.342
  7. Nord, C. (2021). Liminal space and the negotiation of care work in extra-care housing. Health & Place, 69, 102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102575
  8. Petrović, G. (1963). Marx’s Theory of Alienation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 23(3), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/2105083
  9. Purvis, M. (2023). What Is Liminal Space And How Does It Affect You? betterhelp. https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/general/understanding-how-liminal-space-is-different-from-other-places/
  10. Rasmussen, G., Hougaard, A., & Schultz, P. (2016). Liminality as a framework for understanding the experiences of space and place in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 87, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.10.003
  11. Salingaros, N. A. (2013). Architecture, patterns, and mathematics. Nexus Network Journal, 15(1), 161–184
  12. Sengupta, S., & Basu, S. (2005). Aesthetic perception in the evaluation of architectural design. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 801–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274013
  13. Sharif, A. A. (2022). The Secret Lives of Corridors: Networks of Relations in Transitional Built Spaces. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091248
  14. Valtchanov, D., & Ellard, C. G. (2010). Exploring the restorative potential of a virtual natural environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
  15. Van Manen, M. (2014). Liminal space. In Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (hal. 42–56). Left Coast Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.