DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.6.1.20-27

Implementation of Sustainable Slum Handling Program (Empirical Study of the KOTAKU Program)

*Alamsyah Pratama  -  Postgraduate Program, Planning and Regional Development, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
M. H. Jamil  -  Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
A. Roland Barkey  -  Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
Received: 28 Jul 2020; Published: 28 Feb 2021.
Editor(s): Rukuh Setiadi, Ph.D

Citation Format:
Abstract

The handling of slums is an issue that continues to be a concern until now to realize a city and settlements are livable, inclusive, safe, and sustainable. To realize this, the Government & NUSP-2 collaborated to form the KOTAKU (City Without Slums) program. Sinjai Regency, South Sulawesi. This research used descriptive qualitative methods with logic analysis approaches, including data collection, reduction, display, and verification. Data collection used observation of slums that have been handled, documentation, and interviews with key informants. The results showed that the implementation of the KOTAKU program succeeded in reducing the area of slums in some priority areas of handling. The results also showed that not all aspects are sustainable applied to handling slums through the KOTAKU program.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: implementation; KOTAKU program slums; sustainable

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Ahmad, H., Indar, Palluturi, S., Suriah, S., & Yani, A. (2019). Management of slum settings through the private city program (Kotaku) towards a city of health, Makassar, Indonesia. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(9), 1580–1582. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02675.5
  2. Akbar, A., Swasto, D. F., & Marsoyo, A. (2018). Evaluasi relevansi implementasi program penanganan permukiman kumuh di Kota Semarang. In A. E. Pravitasari, E. Rustiadi, J. T. Hidayat, & D. O. Pribadi (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Asosiasi Sekolah Perencanaan Indonesia (ASPI) 2018 (pp. 659–668). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
  3. Andreasen, M. H., & Møller-Jensen, L. (2016). Beyond the networks: Self-help services and post-settlement network extensions in the periphery of Dar es Salaam. Habitat International, 53, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.003
  4. Bathari, A. M., Limba, R. S., & Mustafa, L. O. (2018). Implementation of the KOTAKU program: Case study in Kendari. Journal Publicuho, 1(2), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v1i2.5827
  5. Cronin, V. L. M. (2012). Slum upgrading in India and Kenya: Investigating the sustainability (University of Cambridge). University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.14018
  6. Dahlan, L., Triyuwono, I., & Djamhuri, A. (2020). Why MSME's do social responsibility? a study on the traditional Bugis fishing business in Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 100(4), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2020-04.02
  7. Degert, I., Parikh, P., & Kabir, R. (2016). Sustainability assessment of a slum upgrading intervention in Bangladesh. Cities, 56, 63–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.002
  8. Dianingrum, A., Faqih, M., & Septanti, D. (2017). Development of kampung improvement program in Surabaya, Indonesia. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(7), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.9790/1813-0607014147
  9. Elrayies, G. M. (2016). Rethinking slums: An approach for slums development towards sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(6), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n6p225
  10. Goswami, S., & Manna, S. (2013). Urban poor living in slums: A case study of Raipur City in India. Global Journal of Health Science, 13(4), 15–22
  11. Government of Sinjai. (2019). Profil program KOTAKU permukiman kumuh Kawasan Lappa Kabupaten Sinja. Sinjai: POKJA PKP Kabupaten Sinjai
  12. Gunari, B. F., Persada, C., & Ansar, Z. (2017). Priority factors for community participation in the planning stage of neighborhood upgrading shelter and sector project in Bandar Lampung. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 2(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.2.2.87-93
  13. Hanifah, W., & Widyastuti, D. (2016). Penilaian lingkungan fisik permukiman kumuh di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Semarang. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 5(1), 1–10
  14. Hariyanto, A. (2010). Strategi penanganan kawasan kumuh sebagai upaya menciptakan lingkungan perumahan dan permukiman yang sehat (contoh kasus: kota Pangkalpinang). Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota UNISBA, 7(2), 11–37
  15. Idajati, H., Pamungkas, A., Siswanto, V., Fadlilah, U., Firmansyah, F., Nursakti, A. P., & Tucunan, K. (2016). Increasing community knowledge of planning process and online Musrenbang process in Rungkut district Surabaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.105
  16. Idawarni, I. (2009). The harmony concept between government program and community need to achieve sustainability. Proceedings of W110 Conference Informal Settlements and Affordable Housing
  17. Jayanimitta, M. E., & Mardiansjah, F. H. (2019). Residents ’ Assessment in Kaligawe Slum Area , Semarang. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 4(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.4.2.38-48
  18. Kustiwan, I., & Ramadhan, A. (2019). Urban-Kampong Environment Quality Improvement Strategies towards Inclusive and Sustainable City Development: Lessons from Bandung City. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 3(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2019.3.1.64-84
  19. Mahabir, R., Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., & Agouris, P. (2016). The study of slums as social and physical constructs: challenges and emerging research opportunities. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1229130
  20. Majale, M. (2008). Employment creation through participatory urban planning and slum upgrading: The case of Kitale, Kenya. Habitat International, 32(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.08.005
  21. Marpaung. (2018). Refleksi 20 Tahun Kebijakan Perumahan di Indonesia. Presentasi disampaikan dalam seminar nasional Refleksi 20 Tahun Kebiajkan Perumahan
  22. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New Jersey: Wiley
  23. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis : An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publication, Vol. 1304, pp. 89–92. London
  24. Mukhija, V. (2010). Enabling slum redevelopment in Mumbai: Policy paradox in practice. (August 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030120090548
  25. Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Essex: Pearson
  26. Nursyahbani, R., & Pigawati, B. (2015). Kajian karakteristik kawasan permukiman kumuh di Kampung Kota (studi kasus: Kampung Gandekan Semarang). Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 4(2), 267–281. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/8463
  27. Peerapun, W. (2012). Participatory planning in urban conservation and regeneration: A case study of Amphawa community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 243–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.027
  28. Prayitno, B. (2016). Skema inovatif penanganan permukiman kumuh. Yogyakarta: UGM Press
  29. Rama, M., Setiawan, B., & Widodo, R. (2018). Prospek penanganan kawasan permukiman kumuh berkelanjutan di Kawasan Pesisir Bandarharjo Kota Semarang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Asosiasi Sekolah Perencanaan Indonesia (ASPI) 2018. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
  30. Rohimat, D., Rahmawati, R., & Seran, G. G. (2018). Public Partisipation On Implementation Of KOTAKU/PNPM Program In Ciawi Bogor Municipality. Jurnal Governansi, 3(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.30997/jgs.v3i2.933
  31. Sari, A. C. P., Suman, A., & Kaluge, D. (2018). Implementation Analysis Of Participative Development In National Slum Upgrading Program [ KOTAKU ]. IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development), 2(1), 17–35
  32. Septanaya, I. D. M. F., Rahmawati, D., Navitas, P., & Stefanugroho, P. K. (2020). What sets it apart from the rest? Investigating the national slum upgrading program, KOTAKU, in Surabaya. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 562, 12031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/562/1/012031
  33. Singh, K. (2014). Mapping poverty to reach the urban poor. Social Change, 44(4), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085714548542
  34. Sobotova, L. (2011). Challenges for Participatory Development in Informal Urban Settlements. Olomouc Univesity
  35. Sticzay, N., & Koch, L. (2015). GSDR 2015 brief slum upgrading. Wageningen
  36. Sunarti, Esariti, L., & Haulah, L. (2019). Spatial assessment of slum area in Jepara City from physical and non-physical aspects perspective. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 313, 12034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/313/1/012034
  37. Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing
  38. Uddin, N. (2018). Assessing urban sustainability of slum settlements in Bangladesh: Evidence from Chittagong city. Journal of Urban Management, 7(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.03.002
  39. UN-Habitat. (2016). Sustainable development goal 11 monitoring framework: A guide to assist national and local governments to monitor and report on SDG goal 11+ indicators. Nairobi
  40. Yuliani, S., & Rosyida, G. P. D. (2017). Kolaborasi dalam perencanaan program kota tanpa kumuh (KOTAKU) di Kelurahan Semanggi Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Wacana Publik, 1(2), 33–47

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.