Content Analysis of Resilience Indicators for Mainstreaming Resilience into Semarang City's Development Planning Policies

Tresnasari Ratnaningtias; Wiwandari Handayani

doi:10.14710/ijpd.5.2.45-57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.5.2.45-57

Content Analysis of Resilience Indicators for Mainstreaming Resilience into Semarang City's Development Planning Policies

*Tresnasari Ratnaningtias - Departement of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Wiwandari Handayani

- Departement of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 28 May 2020; Published: 31 Oct 2020.

Editor(s): A. Artiningsih

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{IJPD7913,
    author = {Tresnasari Ratnaningtias and Wiwandari Handayani},
    title = {Content Analysis of Resilience Indicators for Mainstreaming Resilience into Semarang City's Development Planning Policies},
    journal = {The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development},
  volume = {5},
    number = {2},
    year = {2020},
    keywords = {city resilience index; city strategic planning; content analysis; development planning policy; resilience indicators; urban community resilience assessment},
    abstract = { Resilience assessment has been conducted in Semarang City by two different organizations using two different methods, i.e., City Resilience Index (CRI) and Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) in 2017 and 2018. Based on the result of those resilience assessments, it reveals that some of the resilience indicators are not suitable for local conditions in Semarang City regarding development planning policies. City strategic planning is a mid-term development planning policy with a combination of sectoral planning and comprehensive planning to budgeting process of the local government programs. It also includes local government performance indicators that reflect the level of good governance and lead to enhance city resilience. Hence, indicators in city strategic planning also can be considered as resilience indicators. All of this implies that city strategic planning describes the local government already uses resilience thinking in its strategies, policies, and programs. However, city resilience encompasses many aspects and more complex. This study aims to identify between CRI and UCRA, which method having resilience indicators that are compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning. CRI and UCRA use different methods and aim at different scopes when assessing resilience in the city. The results of the content analysis on the document of development planning policies, such as the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning and Revision of the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning, highlight the similarities and differences between CRI and UCRA. It reveals that CRI’s resilience indicators are more compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning rather than UCRA’s resilience indicators. },
   issn = {2442-983X},   pages = {45--57}  doi = {10.14710/ijpd.5.2.45-57},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijpd/article/view/7913}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Resilience assessment has been conducted in Semarang City by two different organizations using two different methods, i.e., City Resilience Index (CRI) and Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) in 2017 and 2018. Based on the result of those resilience assessments, it reveals that some of the resilience indicators are not suitable for local conditions in Semarang City regarding development planning policies. City strategic planning is a mid-term development planning policy with a combination of sectoral planning and comprehensive planning to budgeting process of the local government programs. It also includes local government performance indicators that reflect the level of good governance and lead to enhance city resilience. Hence, indicators in city strategic planning also can be considered as resilience indicators. All of this implies that city strategic planning describes the local government already uses resilience thinking in its strategies, policies, and programs. However, city resilience encompasses many aspects and more complex. This study aims to identify between CRI and UCRA, which method having resilience indicators that are compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning. CRI and UCRA use different methods and aim at different scopes when assessing resilience in the city. The results of the content analysis on the document of development planning policies, such as the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning and Revision of the 2016-2021 Semarang’s city strategic planning, highlight the similarities and differences between CRI and UCRA. It reveals that CRI’s resilience indicators are more compatible, applicable, and suitable for Semarang’s city strategic planning rather than UCRA’s resilience indicators.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: city resilience index; city strategic planning; content analysis; development planning policy; resilience indicators; urban community resilience assessment

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 5, No 2 (2020): October 2020

Recent articles

Community Resilience to Climate Change in Agricultural Sector (Case Study of Sentolo Subdistrict) Government Investment in The Education Sector for Human Capital Development Content Analysis of Resilience Indicators for Mainstreaming Resilience into Semarang City's Development Planning Policies More recent articles

Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Nelson, D. R., Berkes, F., Eakin, H., Folke, C., Galvin, K., Gunderson, L., Goulden, M., O’Brien, K., Ruitenbeek, J., & Tompkins, E. L. (2011). Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(5), 757–766. doi: 10.1002/wcc.133
Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–307. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis isi: Pengantar methodologi untuk penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu-ilmu sosial lainnya (Edisi Pert). Kencana Prenada Media Group
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
Fünfgeld, H., & McEnvoy, D. (2012). Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 324–328. doi;10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Handayani, W., Fisher, M. R., Rudiarto, I., Sih Setyono, J., & Foley, D. (2019). Operationalizing resilience: A content analysis of flood disaster planning in two coastal cities in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35, 101073. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
ISET. (2010). City resilience strategy - Semarang’s adaptation plan in responding to climate change. In Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN). https://www.acccrn.net/resources/city-resilience-strategy-semarangs-adaptation-plan-responding-climate-change
Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31, 220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Second Edi, Vol. 79). SAGE Publications. doi: 10.2307/2288384
Leach, M. (2008). Re-framing resilience: A symposium report. In STEPS Working Paper 13. STEPS Centre. doi: 10.2307/977312
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE Publications. http://www.amazon.com/Content-Analysis-Guidebook-Kimberly-Neuendorf/dp/0761919783/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1395675490&sr=1-1&keywords=Content+analysis+guidebook+Neuendorf
Porter, L., & Davoudi, S. (2012). The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 329–333. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Rangwala, L., Elias-trostmann, K., Wihanesta, R., & Chandra, M. (2018). Prepared communities; implementing the urban community resilience assessment in vulnerable neighborhoods of three cities
Reed, S. O., Friend, R., Toan, V. C., Thinphanga, P., Sutarto, R., & Singh, D. (2013). “Shared learning” for building urban climate resilience – experiences from Asian cities. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 393–412.doi: 10.1177/0956247813501136
Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social–ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners (Version 2.0). doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0074-0
Romero-Lankao, P., Gnatz, D., Wilhelmi, O., & Hayden, M. (2016). Urban sustainability and resilience: From theory to practice. Sustainability, 8(12), 1224. doi: 10.3390/su8121224
Shaw, K. (2012). “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 308–312. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
Sutarto, R., & Jarvie, J. (2012). Integrating climate resilience strategy into city planning in Semarang, Indonesia (Climate Resilience Working Paper No. 2). http://www.i-s-e-t.org/resource-resilience-working-paper-1
The Rockefeller Foundation & ARUP. (2015). City resilience index (Issue December). https://doi.org/London, United Kingdom
Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city? Building Research and Information, 42(2), 191–201. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
White, I., & O’Hare, P. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 934–950. doi: 10.1068/c12117
Wilkinson, C. (2012). Urban resilience: What does it mean in planning practice? Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 319–324
World Resources Institute, IUCCE, & Semarang Municipality. (2018). Urban community resilience assessment in Semarang

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Copyright (c) 2020 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development (IJPD). Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at IJPD has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes (follow the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License).

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from IJPD. However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

IJPD and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in IJPD. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.