skip to main content

Regional Development Strategies in New Growth Centers Around Barsela Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Southwest Aceh Regency

*Cut Zulfa Husna orcid  -  Regional Planning Science Study Program, Department of Soil Science and Land Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia
Andrea Emma Pravitasari orcid scopus  -  Division of Regional Development Planning, Department of Soil Science and Land Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB university, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia
Andi Syah Putra orcid scopus  -  Center for Regional Systems Analysis Plannin and Development (CRESTPENT), IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 14 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025; Available online: 28 Feb 2025; Published: 19 May 2025.
Editor(s): Prihadi Nugroho
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Aceh Province has significant regional disparities, especially in the Southwest (Barsela). However, this region is strategically located, prompting the government to develop a strategic area that is the Barsela Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Southwest Aceh Regency, which is located in Babahrot District, with Kuala Batee District as the closest hinterland. These two districts have the highest poverty rates in the regency, making the SEZ a potential catalyst for new growth center. This study aims to determine priority villages as new growth centers and regional development strategies using scalogram, gravity, network analysis, AHP-TOPSIS, and SWOT methods. Scalogram analysis shows that most villages around the Barsela SEZ have low regional development, with 54% in Hierarchy III, 29% in Hierarchy II, and 17% in Hierarchy I. Gravity analysis indicates low to moderate regional interactions, with NTIAD below 4,000,000 interaction units. Road network centrality is also generally low, with only four villages classified as high, based on Degree Centrality (0.31), Closeness Centrality (0.26), and Betweenness Centrality (0.43). Based on AHP-TOPSIS, Pante Rakyat Village is prioritized as a new growth center due to its high regional development, strong attractiveness, and good spatial centrality. The main development strategy is the Turnaround Strategy, which focuses on utilizing opportunities and addressing weaknesses. This research is expected to support spatial planning around the Barsela SEZ and contribute to Southwest Aceh Regency and Aceh Province government policies.

Fulltext
Keywords: Special Economic Zone (SEZ); New Growth Center; Regional Development
Funding: Pusbindiklatren Bappenas

Article Metrics:

  1. Afrianto, F., Yudono, A., & Hariyanto, A. D. (2022). Strategi Peningkatan Konektivitas Akibat Pengaruh Perubahan Sentralitas Jaringan Jalan Sebelum dan Setelah Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara Terhadap Pola Aktivitas Penduduk Provinsi Kalimantan.Prosiding Forum Ilmiah Nusantara (p. 186)
  2. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). (2021). Data Terpadu Kesejahteraan Sosial (DTKS). https://sepakat.bappenas.go.id/
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2024). Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh. Accessed 06 Agustus 2024 ( https://aceh.bps.go.id/indicator/23/42/2/persentase-penduduk-miskin-p0menurutkabupaten-kota.html)
  4. Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M. M., Erkan, I., Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 54-72
  5. Buonocore, C., Carlucci, F., Ciciarelli, L., Papola, A., Tinessa, F., Tocchi, D., Trincone, B. (2023). Accessibility Analysis in Spatial Planning: A Case of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in Campania, Southern Italy. Land Use Policy, 132, 106763
  6. Chaube, S., Pant, S., Kumar, A., Uniyal, S., Singh, M.K., Kotecha, K., Kumar, A. (2024). An overview of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and The Applications of AHP and TOPSIS Methods. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering & Management Sciences. 9(3)
  7. Chen, H., Cheng, K., Zhang, M. (2023). Does Geographic Proximity Affect Firms’ Cross-Regional Development? Evidence From High-Speed Rail Construction in China. Economic Modelling, 126, 106402
  8. Christaller, W. (1933). Central Places in Southern Germany (translated by Baskin C. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
  9. Cooper, C.H. & Chiaradia, A.J. (2020). sDNA: 3-d Spatial Network Analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX. 12: 100525
  10. Darmastuti, S. (2018). Special Economic Area (Sez) and Economic Development: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and China. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdep.v1i2.72
  11. Darmawan, H. D., Noerdjamal, D., Putri, F. Y., Ainunnajah, H. D., Almayda, M. I., Subianto, R. (2021). Strategi Pariwisata Terintegrasi Berbasis Sentralitas Spasial Pada Desa Wisata Di Kabupaten Sleman. Barista: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Pariwisata, 8(1), 78-95
  12. Febrianto, F.H. & Santoso, E.B. (2022). Pengembangan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan di Wilayah Madiun Raya untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Ketimpangan Pendapatan Wilayah. Jurnal Penataan Ruang. 17(1): 41
  13. Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P., White, D.R. (1991). Centrality in Valued Graphs: A Measure of Betweenness Based on Network Flow. Social networks. 13(2): 141-154
  14. Galle, J., Overbeck, D., Riedel, N., Seidel, T. (2022). Place-Based Policies and Structural Change: Evidence from India's Special Economic Zones. SSRN
  15. Glasson, J. & Marshall, T. (2007). Regional Planning. New York: Routledge
  16. Hasan, Z. (2021). Indonesian Economic Diversification As An Emerging Markets Country to Drive Economic Growth. Inovasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 17(3), 549-564
  17. Irwin, M.D. & Hughes, H.L. (1992). Centrality and the Structure of Urban Interaction: Measures, Concepts, and Applications. Social Forces;71: 17–51
  18. Judijanto, L., Devi, E. K., Fatimah, S., Susanti, P. (2024). Pengaruh Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Distribusi Pendapatan Terhadap Ketimpangan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Sanskara Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 2(03), 178-187
  19. Junias, D. T. S. (2018). Kajian Perspektif Pengembangan Wilayah Kabupaten Rote Ndao Sebagai Salah Satu Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus. Jaka - Jurnal Jurusan Akuntasi, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.32511/jaka.v3i1.229
  20. Junyent, I., Casanovas, M., Roukouni, A., Moreno, S., Blanch, Correia, G. (2024). Planning Shared Mobility Hubs in European Cities: A Methodological Framework Using MCDA and GIS Applied to Barcelona. Sustainable Cities and Society. 106
  21. Kezia, L., Hariyani, S., Yudono, A. (2021). Aksesibilitas Dan Skala Pelayanan Angkutan Massal Demi Terwujudnya Integrasi Dengan Guna Lahan DKI Jakarta. Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE), 10(2), 97-108
  22. Kuswandi, A. (2012). Pembangunan Wilayah Secara Berimbang. Kybernan: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 47-53
  23. Leksono, V. A. (2015). Pemodelan Multi Objective Decision Making Untuk Penyeleksian Portofolio: Suatu Pendekatan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS. Doctoral dissertation. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  24. Lim, H. & Han, C. (2023). National Borders Transcended: The Impact of Geographical Proximity On The Growth of Global Innovation Networks Among Cities in East Asia. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(4), 570-598
  25. Muhtar, R., Fitriadi, Y., Janna, J., Febriani, I. (2021). Tinjauan Kewilayahan dan Harmonisasi Fungsi Ruang Kawasan Calon Ibu Kota Negara dengan Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara Sebagai Wilayah Pendukung (Kawasan Hinterland). Seminar Nasional Geomatika. 347
  26. Mujio, M., Septiawan, Y., Hidayat, J.T., Armadi, D.A., Ningsih, N.W., Nugraha, H., Rajayu, R.A., Sari, D.K., Fernandina, M. (2023). Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan Sebagai Arahan Pengembangan Kawasan Perdesaan di Kecamatan Cijeruk Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati: Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 9-23
  27. Muslim, S., Utomo, R.P., Permana, C. T. H. (2023). Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Pola Spasial Tutupan Lahan di Sekitar Kawasan Industri Purwosuman, Sragen. Region : Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 18(1), 38
  28. Musrafiyan, M. (2021). Potensi Pembangunan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus (KEK) Halal Barsela Sebagai Destinasi Pariwisata Prioritas di Era Society 5.0. Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Studies“Islam & Sustainable Development, 488–501
  29. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: G. Duckworth
  30. Noezula, F. (2023). Analisis ketimpangan, Tingkat Perkembangan Wilayah dan Keragaman Spasial Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya di Provinsi Aceh. Thesis. IPB University
  31. Noviyanti, D., Pravitasari, A.E., & Sahara, S. (2020). Analisis Perkembangan Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat Untuk Arahan Pembangunan Berbasis Wilayah Pengembangan. Jurnal Geografi, 12(01): 280
  32. Nuryadin, D. & Anjani A.D. (2023). Analisis kausalitas Infrastruktur Transportasi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Develop, 7(2), 1-20
  33. Optari, L.K. (2021). Analisis Interaksi Spasial Terhadap Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan Pada Pengembangan Wilayah Kabupaten Asahan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE AAS (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 512-521)
  34. Perroux, F. (1950). Note sur la motion de pole la Groisance. Economic Applioquce. 8: 307-320
  35. Pravitasari, A. E., Rustiadi, E., Priatama, R. A., Murtadho, A., Kurnia, A. A., Mulya, S.P., Wulandari, S. (2021). Spatiotemporal Distribution Patterns and Local Driving Factors of Regional Development in Java. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 10(12), 812
  36. Purmawan, H., Kustiani, I., & Sarkowi, S. (2024). Keterpaduan Infrastruktur Terpadu Antar Sektor Untuk Mendukung Pengembangan Wilayah Kabupaten Pringsewu. Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Universitas Lampung, 5(1), 7-10
  37. Putra, O. R. & Revolina, E. (2023). Analisis Penentuan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kota Bengkulu. Journal of Social and Policy Issues, 140-144
  38. Rodriguez-Pose, A., Bartalucci, F., Frick, S.A., Santos‐Paulino, A.U., Bolwijn, R. (2022). The Challenge of Developing Special Economic Zones in Africa: Evidence and Lessons Learnt. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 14(2), 456-482
  39. Rose, A. J., Kabban, C. M. S., Graham, S. R., Henry, W. C., Rondeau, C. M. (2024). Malware Classification Through Abstract Syntax Trees and L-moments. Computers & Security, 148, 104082
  40. Rustiadi, R., Saefulhakim, S., Panuju, D. R. (2011). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
  41. Setiowati, C. & Buchori, I. (2023). Penilaian Tingkat Perkembangan Wilayah Kawasan Strategis Kecamatan Sungai Kunyit Kalimantan Barat Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 19(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v19i2.48640
  42. Siregar, V. S., Lubis, P. K. D., Azkiah, F., Putri, A.(2024). Peran Penting Pendidikan dalam Pembentukan Sumber Daya Manusia Cerdas di Era Digitalisasi Menuju Smart Society 5.0. Journal IJEDR. 2(2):1408-1418
  43. Sitorus, S. R. P., Mulya, S. P., Iswati, A., Panuju, D. R., Iman, L. O. S. (2014). Teknik Penentuan Komoditas Unggulan Pertanian Berdasarkan Potensi Wilayah dalam Rangka Pengembangan Wilayah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional ASPI. Riau (ID): UIR Press
  44. Staeheli, U. (2012). Listing the Global: Disconnectivity Beyond Representation Distinktion. Journal of Social Theory 2012; 13: 233–46
  45. Steenbergen, V. & Sutton, J. (2017). Establishing a Local Content Unit for Rwanda. International Growth Centre Policy Note. April 2017
  46. Suryani, N. I. & Febriani, R. E. (2020). Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Regional: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Convergence: The Journal of Economic Development, 1(2), 40–54
  47. Taufiqqurrachman, F. (2024). Kajian Indeks Skalogram, Indeks Sentralitas Marshall dan Indeks Gravitasi Pada Penentuan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa Timur. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 5952-5963
  48. Viska, Y., Putri, D., Aditya, M. N. A., Mulyono, T. (2024). Analisis Kesinambungan Potensi Kawasan Industri Terhadap Hinterland Pelabuhan Guna Menciptakan Kedinamisan. April
  49. Wahyuni, S., Astuti, E.S., Utari, K.M. (2013). Critical Outlook At Special Economic Zone in Asia: A Comparison Between Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and China. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (JIEB), 28(3), 336-346
  50. Zeng, D.Z. (2016). Special Economic Zones: Lessons From The Global Experience. PEDL Synthesis Paper Series, 1(1), 1-9
  51. Zhao, C. & Qu, X. (2024). Place-Based Policies, Rural Employment, and Intra-Household Resources Allocation: Evidence from China’s Economic Zones. Journal of Development Economics, 167, 103210

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.