Fisherman Livelihood Effects on Marine Conservation Area towards Sustainable Development

*Tiara Sartika Worowirasmi  -  Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing, Indonesia
Artiningsih Artiningsih  -  Department of Urban and Development Planning, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Received: 26 Jan 2018; Published: 28 Feb 2018.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development

Citation Format:
Abstract
Excessive utilization of coastal resources is threatening the livelihood of coastal dependent people. The current challenge is how to maintain and use coastal resources sustainably without reducing their potential benefits in the future. In response to coastal sustainability issues, many countries have implemented a policy to support marine protected areas. Until 2008, approximately 3.2 million hectares of marine protected areas conserved in Indonesia. One of them located in Ujungnegoro-Roban, Batang Regency of Central Java Province, Indonesia. This study aims to analyze fisherman livelihoods in Ujungnegoro-Roban, which may affect the fishermen’s conservation choices. This study employs questionnaire survey as the main data collection source, which was distributed to 60 fishermen randomly. The findings indicated some fisherman livelihood factors which have significant support for conservation activities, i.e. age, experience, income level and fisherman organization membership.
Keywords: fisherman livelihood; marine conservation area; sustainable coastal development

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
In Vol 3, No 1 (2018): February 2018
Statistics: 637 335
Others articles
Gender Equality in Climate Change Adaptation: A Case of Cirebon, Indonesia Comparison Study of Three Industrial Parks in Central Java Indonesia Creating Urban Water Resilience: Review of China’s Development Strategies “Sponge City” Concept and Practices The Role of Social Entrepreneurship on Kampong Development in the City of Semarang Collaborative Planning on Cross-Border Service of Water Supply in Surakarta Urban Border Area, Indonesia Typologies of Peri-Urban Klaten-Central Java: A study based on Socio-Economic Perspective
  1. Abecasis, R. C., Schmidt, L., Longnecker, N., & Clifton, J. (2013). Implications of community and stakeholder perceptions of the marine environment and its conservation for MPA management in a small
  2. Azorean island. Ocean and Coastal Management, 84, 208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.009
  3. Angulo-Valdés, J. A., & Hatcher, B. G. (2010). A new typology of benefits derived from marine protected areas. Marine Policy, 34(3), 635–644. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.002
  4. Department for International Development (DFID). (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets Framework Introduction Vulnerability Transforming
  5. Department for International Development (DFID). (2005). Caribbean: Institutions and decision support tools for pro-poor livelihoods in Integrated Coastal Zone Management. Retrieved from http://www.nrsp.org.uk/pdfs/resources/NSS/Ca S1 NSS 05-06.pdf
  6. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Batang. (2007). Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan KKLD Ujungnegoro – Roban 2008. Batang
  7. Fox, H. E., Mascia, M. B., Basurto, X., Costa, A., Glew, L., Heinemann, D., … White, A. T. (2012). Reexamining the science of marine protected areas: Linking knowledge to action. Conservation Letters, 5(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00207.x
  8. Gelcich, S., Edwards-Jones, G., & Kaiser, M. J. (2005). Importance of attitudinal differences among artisanal fishers toward co-management and conservation of marine resources. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 865–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00534.x
  9. Hamilton, M. (2012). Perceptions of fishermen towards MPAs in Cambodia and the Philippines. Bioscience Horizons, 5, 1–24. doi: 10.1093/biohorizons/hzs007
  10. Heuër, A., Navarette, D., van Bochove, J.-W., Harding, S., & Raines, P. (2008). Socio-Economic Study: Local Livelihoods, Use and Management of Coastal Resources and Efficiency of Marine Protected Area’s in Panaon Island. London. Retrieved from http://www.coralcay.org/app/download/5781241859/SocMon+Report+Panaon_final.pdf
  11. International Marine Management. (2008). Sustainable Livelihoods Enhancement and Diversification. Retrieved from http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/sled_final_1.pdf
  12. Kelleher, G. (1999). Guidelines for marine protected areas. (A. Phillips, Ed.), Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN-The World Conservation Union. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.1999.PAG.3.en
  13. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan (KKP) Republik Indonesia. (2012). Marine Protected Area Form. Retrieved from http://kkji.kp3k.kkp.go.id/index.php/en/marine-protected-area-data/details/7/81
  14. Kleih, U., Alam, K., Dastidar, R., Dutta, U., Oudwater, N., & Ward, A. (2003). Livelihoods in Coastal Fishing Communities, and The Marine
  15. Fish Marketing System of Bangladesh. Fisheries Research. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Livelihoods+in+coastal+fishing+communities+and+the+marine+fish+marketing+system+of+Bangladesh#0
  16. Kusnadi. (2009). Kebudayaan Masyarakat Nelayan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
  17. Leleu, K., Alban, F., Pelletier, D., Charbonnel, E., Letourneur, Y., & Boudouresque, C. F. (2012). Fishers’ perceptions as indicators of the performance of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Marine Policy, 36(2), 414–422. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.002
  18. MacNeil, M. A., & Cinner, J. E. (2013). Hierarchical livelihood outcomes among co-managed fisheries. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.003
  19. Mccay, B. J., & Jones, P. J. S. (2011). Marine protected areas and the governance of marine ecosystems and fisheries. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1130–1133. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01771.x
  20. McClanahan, T., Davies, J., & Maina, J. (2005). Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environmental Conservation, 32(1), 42–49. doi: 10.1017/S0376892904001791
  21. Pita, C., Pierce, G. J., Theodossiou, I., & Macpherson, K. (2011). An overview of commercial fishers’ attitudes towards marine protected areas. Hydrobiologia, 670(1), 289–306. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0665-9
  22. Rodríguez-Martínez, R. E. (2008). Community involvement in marine protected areas: The case of Puerto Morelos reef, México. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1151–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.008
  23. Sesabo, J. K., Lang, H., & Tol, R. S. J. (2006). Perceived Attitude and Marine Protected Areas ( MPAs ) establishment : Why households’ characteristics matters in Coastal resources conservation initiatives in Tanzania. Working Paper FNU-99. Hamburg. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.175.5674&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  24. Vodouhê, F. G., Coulibaly, O., Adégbidi, A., & Sinsin, B. (2010). Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(7), 505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.008
  25. World Wild Fund (WWF). (2008). Marine Protected Areas Providing a Future for Fish and People. Gland, Switzerland

Last update: 2021-05-07 00:02:07

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-05-07 00:02:07

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright publishing shall be assigned to IJPD and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Diponegoro University as the journal publisher.

Copyright includes the right to reproduce and provide articles in all forms and media, including reprints, and any other similar reproduction as well as translations. The author still has the rights to duplicate the material as a compilation for the author’s and for distribution in the institution where the author works.