skip to main content

Urban Areas in Indonesia: How does Smart Living is Implemented ?

*Umi Kulsum  -  Master of Government Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Eko Priyo Purnomo  -  Senior Lecturer Master of Government Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 11 Jun 2022; Published: 31 Oct 2022.
Editor(s): Ninik Suhartini, Ph.D
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the implementation of smart living in urban areas in Indonesia. Because Indonesia is included in the ten countries with the fastest urbanization growth in 2014, where urbanization growth is also accompanied by the emergence of various complex problems in urban areas. A mature urban strategy is needed to minimize the occurrence of various problems such as environmental crises, social problems, and irregular urban planning due to rapid urbanization. One of these problems can be overcome by implementing smart living, where the city provides comfort in terms of the environment, sustainable resources, physical and non-physical beauty, visual or not, for the community and the public. The measurement of the implementation of smart living in urban areas is seen from several indicators such as cultural facilities, health conditions, individual safety, housing quality, educational facilities, touristic, and social cohesion. This study uses qualitative research with data analysis using Nvivo 12 Plus and VOSviewer software. The data sources that the author uses are journals obtained from Scopus which are then downloaded in RIS format and processed using VOSviewer and Nvivo 12 Plus. The results of this study indicate that in implementing smart living in urban Indonesia, the security guarantee indicator has not been able to be fulfilled and has the lowest percentage compared to other indicators. while the indicators that have been able to be fulfilled and have the highest percentage are health service facilities. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Urban; smart living; development

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Persentase Rumah Tangga Kumuh Perkotaan (40% Ke Bawah), Menurut Provinsi (Persen), 2017-2019. Jakarta
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik
  3. Cohen, B. (2013). Smart City Wheel. Smart & Safe City
  4. Cohen, D. A., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50(1), 2–19
  5. Creswell, J. (2008). Educational Research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Prentice Hall
  6. Direktorat Statistik Ketahanan Sosial. (2021). Statistik Kriminal 2021. E-Book, 15
  7. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., & Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4)
  8. Hasibuan, A., & Sulaiman, oris krianto. (2019). Smart City , Konsep Kota Cerdas Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Perkotaan Kabupaten / Kota ,. Buletinutama Teknik, 14(2), 127–135
  9. Hutama, I. A. W., & Djunaedi, A. (2019). Pemetaan Kategori Dimensi Smart City Berdasarkan Ragam Inovasi Aplikasi Dan Situs Web Manajemen Perkotaan Di Indonesia. Tataloka, 21(3), 445. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.21.3.445-458
  10. Jayanti, V. A., Purnomo, E. P., & Nurkasiwi, A. (2020). Vertical garden: Penghijauan untuk mendukung smart living di Kota Yogyakarta. Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v5i1.2916
  11. Kamil, M., Roziqin, A., & Rahmawati, Y. (2021). Dynamic Governance Model Within Integrated Waste Management In Malang City: Agile People And Process In Actions. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.123140
  12. Kassim, N. M., Yeap, J. A. L., Nathan, S., Hashim, N. H., & Ramayah, T. (2019). A Conceptual Paper of the Smart City and Smart Community. In Eurasian Economic Perspectives, Springer, Cham, 39–47
  13. Kementerian Kesehatan. (2020). Air dan Kesehatan. InfoDATIN, p. 10
  14. P. Ratnasari. (2020). Politik Pembangunan Di Kota Palangkaraya Menuju Smart City Kota Palangkaraya. 6(12), 1–10
  15. Roseland, M. (1991). Toward sustainable cities. Ecodecision, 3, 48–52
  16. Saputro, W. T. T. (2019). Kajian Tentang Smart City: Paradigma, Kesempatan,Permasalahan Yang Ada Di KabupatenPurworejo. Jurnal INTEK, 2, 1–9
  17. Setyowati, K., Susiloadi, P., & Suryawati, R. (2019). Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Pdam Dalam Mewujudkan Smart Living. Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v14i1.34000
  18. Supriyantiwi, R. F., Sianturi, M., Safrudin, S., & Santoso, S. (2020). Implementasi Konsep Smartcity Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Studi Kasus Kota Tangerang Selatan. Proceedings Humanis Universitas Pamulang, 1(1), 16–24
  19. Suranto, Kencono, D. S., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Do Cultural Values Affect the Implementation of Smart Living Policy in Yogyakarta City? 518(ICoSIHESS 2020), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.102
  20. Tan, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Shuai, C., & Shen, G. Q. (2018). Green retrofit of aged residential buildings in Hong Kong: A preliminary study. Building and Environment, 143, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.058
  21. Tsumagari, M. I., & Ojha, B. (2021). Responding to Urban Sphere’s Mobility Challenge: A Case of Nepal’s Historic City. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 12(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.122135
  22. Utomo, C. E. W., & Hariadi, M. (2016). Strategi Pembangunan Smart City dan Tantangannya bagi Masyarakat Kota. Jurnal Strategi Dan Bisnis Vol.4, 4(2), 159–176
  23. Wanto, A. H. (2018). Strategi Pemerintah Kota Malang Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Konsep Smart City. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 2(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v2n1.p39-43
  24. Water, U. N. (2018). 2018 UN World Water Development Report, Nature-based Solutions for Water
  25. Widyaningsih, D. (2013). Kota Surabaya Menuju Smart City. Universitas Gadjah Mada (Doctoral Dissertation)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.