Decision Analysis of Alternative River Debris to Landfill Transportation Systems in Jakarta

Mega Mutiara Sari; Takanobu Inoue; Regil Kentaurus Harryes; Shigeru Kato; Iva Yenis Septiariva; Sapta Suhardono; Suprihanto Notodarmojo; Kevin Foggy Delu; I Wayan Koko Suryawan

doi:10.14710/ijpd.7.1.%p

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.7.1.%25p

Decision Analysis of Alternative River Debris to Landfill Transportation Systems in Jakarta

*Mega Mutiara Sari - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

Takanobu Inoue - Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology,, Japan

Regil Kentaurus Harryes - Faculty of Vocational Studies, Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia, Indonesia

Shigeru Kato - Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan

Iva Yenis Septiariva - Study Program of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Sapta Suhardono - Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Suprihanto Notodarmojo - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Kevin Foggy Delu - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

I Wayan Koko Suryawan - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

Received: 14 Feb 2022; Published: 28 Feb 2022.

Editor(s): Rukuh Setiadi, Ph.D

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:

Abstract

River debris in Jakarta is generated in several locations by conventional transportation. Waste transportation with traditional models is usually not time-efficient, primarily when river debris is generated every time. Transport systems that can be used for river debris include compactor systems, pre-compactor systems, and baller systems. This research uses literature study and secondary data in determining alternatives. Meanwhile, the alternative selection was carried out using the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. This study uses four criteria for selecting alternatives: initial capital, type of transport container, operation and maintenance, and processing capability. The utility value of waste transportation with compaction and pre-compacting systems does not significantly have utility values of 0.722 and 0.833, respectively. At the same time, the baller system has a utility value of 0.222. This shows that the compacted system is more suitable to be applied to SPA river debris in Jakarta. The presence of a pr-compactor can also reduce the water content in-river debris.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext | Research Instrument

Turnitin (Plagiarism Check)

Subject
Type	Research Instrument
	Download (1MB) Indexing metadata

Keywords: baller system; compactor system; decision analysis; pre-compactor system; river debris

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 7, No 1 (2022): February 2022 (Article in Progress)

Recent articles

Sectoral Potential Analysis For Development Planning In Binjai, Deli Serdang, Karo (Bidangro) Metropolitan Area Critical Risk Factors of PPP Water Supply Project in Indonesia (Case Study: West Semarang Drinking Water Supply Project) Decision Analysis of Alternative River Debris to Landfill Transportation Systems in Jakarta More recent articles

Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., Tseng, M. L., & Wong, W. P. (2018). Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020
Alinezhad, A., & Khalili, J. (2019). New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM). In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 277). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15009-9_17
Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1991). A theorem connecting utility function optimization and compromise programming. Operations Research Letters, 10(7), 421–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(91)90045-Q
Hao, Y., Quan, L., Cheng, H., Xia, L., Ge, L., & Zhao, B. (2018). Potential energy directly conversion and utilization methods used for heavy duty lifting machinery. Energy, 155, 242–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.015
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2013). Public Works No.03/PRT/M/2013 concerning the Implementation of Waste Infrastructure and Facilities in the Handling of Household Waste and Types of Household Waste. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia
Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H., Teklemariam, D., Houshyar, E., De Maeyer, P., & Witlox, F. (2019). Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0035-5
Kuehn, J. A. (1981). Solid Waste System Feasibility Guide for Local Decisionmakers in the Rural Ozarks (No. 449). US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Mojtahedi, M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Newton, S. (2021). Sustainable vehicle routing problem for coordinated solid waste management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, 100220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100220
Nemat, B., Razzaghi, M., Bolton, K., & Rousta, K. (2022). Design affordance of plastic food packaging for consumer sorting behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 105949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105949
Pawar, P. R., Shirgaonkar, S. S., & Patil, R. B. (2016). Plastic marine debris: Sources, distribution and impacts on coastal and ocean biodiversity. PENCIL Publication of Biological Sciences, 3(1), 40–54
Rech, S., Macaya-Caquilpán, V., Pantoja, J. F., Rivadeneira, M. M., Jofre Madariaga, D., & Thiel, M. (2014). Rivers as a source of marine litter – A study from the SE Pacific. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 82(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.019
Sheavly, S. B., & Register, K. M. (2007). Marine Debris & Plastics: Environmental Concerns, Sources, Impacts and Solutions. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 15(4), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-007-0074-3
US-EPA. (2002). Waste Transfer Stations: A Manual for Decision Making. EPA
Yadav, V., & Karmakar, S. (2020). Sustainable collection and transportation of municipal solid waste in urban centers. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101937
Yu, P. L. (1973). A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.19.8.936
Zakaria, S. N. F., Aziz, H. A., Hung, Y.-T., Mojiri, A., & Glysson, E. A. (2021). Mechanical Volume Reduction BT - Solid Waste Engineering and Management: Volume 1 (L. K. Wang, M.-H. S. Wang, & Y.-T. Hung (eds.); pp. 297–343). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84180-5_5
Zopounidis, C., Dimitras, A. I., & Le Rudulier, L. (1998). A Multicriteria Approach for the Analysis and Prediction of Business Failure in Greece BT - Operational Tools in the Management of Financial Risks (C. Zopounidis (ed.); pp. 107–119). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5495-0_7

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development (IJPD). Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at IJPD has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes (follow the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License).

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from IJPD. However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

IJPD and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in IJPD. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.