skip to main content

PNI Political Strategy to Win the 1955 Election in Indonesia

*Agustina Wilujeng Pramestuti  -  Doctoral Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Yety Rochwulaningsih  -  Doctoral Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Singgih Tri Sulistiyono  -  Doctoral Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This article aims to reveal the reason and how the Indonesian Nationalist Party (PNI) succeeded in becoming the winning party of the General Election (Pemilu) in Indonesia in 1955 by gaining the most votes as many as 8,434,653 votes, followed by the Indonesian Muslim Shura Council Party (Masyumi) of 7,903,886 votes and Nahdlatul Ulama Party (NU) of 6,955,141 votes. The 1955 election was the first direct election in Indonesia to be the most democratic in history since the campaign did not only take place in big cities, but had reached villages and even remote villages. The atmosphere of contestation was very strong, but it was not accompanied by a violent conflict even though the contestation was from political parties with very different ideological backgrounds. In this context, the political strategy pursued by the PNI is very interesting, that is by consolidating politics both internally and externally. To examine the problems, historical methods were used in which data were excavated from primary sources including news and articles in newspapers and magazines, as well as minutes of parliamentary meetings regarding the Election. The results of the analysis showed that the PNI performed politics consolidation through cooperation with various groups and political parties of any ideology. In addition, the PNI also adopted the conception of Sukarno's thinking to mobilize supporters, including through meetings, open meetings attended by the people by presenting prominent nationalist figures as their orators. The issues raised in the campaign had distinctive characteristics of nationalism, citizenship, and mutual cooperation.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: PNI, Strategy, Nationalism, Elections 1955.

Article Metrics:

  1. hari sebelum 26 September 1955. (1955, 3 September). Madjalah Merdeka, VIII(36)
  2. Anggara, D. (2017). Peran Ormas Seazas dalam membangun dinamikan internal Partai Nasional Indonesia tahun 1946-1962. AVATARA, e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah 5(3): 661-669
  3. Ayu, A. K., Sulistiyono, S. T., Alamsyah (2020). Masyumi’s campaign strategies in the 1955 Election in Jakarta. IHiS (Indonesian Historical Studies) 3(2): 32-42
  4. Benda, H. J. (1964). Review: Democracy in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies23(3): 449-456
  5. Charles M. McCann, “Indonesia Expected to Deal Bad News to Communist China”, Medford Mail Tribune, 27 September 1955
  6. Charles M. McCann, “Indonesia Expected to Deal Bad News to Communist China”, Medford Mail Tribune, 27 September 1955
  7. Crisis in Indonesia. (1955, August 4) The Straits Times
  8. D. Wirata, “Harapan Rakjat”, Sikap Mimbar-Politik, No. 37 Tahun Ke-V, 3 November 1952
  9. Dengan kekuatan PERSATUAN Nasional kesulitan2 dapat kita atasi! (1955, 11 Juni) Merah Putih (Mingguan Populer), III(113)
  10. Dewantarina, A. (2012). Partai Nasional Indonesia pada Pemilihan Umum tahun 1955 di Semarang. Journal of Indonesian History 1(2): 71-77
  11. Edward W. Tan, “Indonesians Start Voting in Test of Democracy Against Red Powe”, The Journal (Meriden, Connecticut), 28 September 1955
  12. Feith, H. (1954). Toward election in Indonesia. Pasific Affairs 27 (3): 236-254
  13. Gatot Mangkupradja: Kerdjasama PNI-PSII dan N.U. daerah Banten memuaskan. (1954, 4 Februari). Merdeka
  14. Imperialisme diluar dan dlm negeri musuh PNI. (1954, 4 Februari). Merdeka
  15. Indonesia’s difficulties. (1953, 24 Juni). The Advertiser (Adelaide)
  16. Kabinet Burhanuddin Harahap tanpa PNI. (1955, 13 Agustus). Madjalah Merdeka, VIII (33)
  17. Kabinet jang akan datang. (1956, 28 Januari). Merah Putih, III(143)
  18. Kampanje pemilihan. (1954, 7 Juni). Merdeka, 2
  19. Kepertjajaan kepada potensi rakjat jg pernah berevolusi. (1955, 28 Maret). Merdeka
  20. Kongres PSII. (1955, 6 April). Merdeka
  21. Lazuardi, M. F. & Yety Rochwulaningsih (2020). Kontestasi partai politik di Sumatra Utara pada masa Demokrasi Liberal 1952-1955. Historiografi 1(1):11-21
  22. Lev, S. D. (1967). Political parties in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian History8(1): 52-67
  23. Liddle, R. W. (1978). The 1977 Indonesian Election and New Order Legitimacy. Southeast Asian Affairs, 122-138
  24. Mujani, Saiful, R. William Liddle, Kuskridho Ambardi (2011). Kuasa rakyat: Analisis tentang perilaku memilih dalam pemilihan legislatif dan presiden pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta: Mizan Publika (Anggota IKAPI)
  25. Mukminin, M. A. (2015). Hubungan NU dan Masyumi (1945-1960): Konflik dan keluarnya NU dari Masyumi. AVATARA 3(3), 487-494
  26. Opposisi hendaki intervensi negara-negara Barat. (1954, 8 Januari) Merdeka, 1
  27. P.N.I. menghadapi pemilihan umum. (1955, 25 Juni). Merah Putih (Mingguan Populer), III (115)
  28. Pasquino, G. (2012). Party elites and democratic consolidation: cross-national comparison of southern European experience. In Securing Democracy: Pol Parties (pp. 54-73). Routledge
  29. Pemilihan umum dan fungsinya. (1952, 24 Desember). Sikap Mimbar-Politik, V(44)
  30. PNI mengawasi tindakan Kabinet untuk kepentingan nusa bangsa: Pernjataan Dewan Pleno PNI Djawa-Tengah. (1955, 23 Agustus). Merdeka
  31. PNI menghendaki ko-eksistensi setjara damai. (1954, 23 Desember). Merdeka, 23, 1
  32. PNI sedia kerdjasama dengan partai partai manapun. (1954, 18 Desember). Merdeka,1
  33. Politik dan Pembangunan. (1955, 2 April). Madjalan Merdeka, VIII (14), 2
  34. Politik kepartaian djanganlah menganggu ketenangan suasana. (1055, 28 Mei). Merah Putih, No. III, Tahun III
  35. Rantjangan Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum. (1952, 8 Desember). Sikap Mimbar-Politik, No. 42 Tahun Ke-V
  36. Reilly, B. (2003). Political parties and political engineering in the Asia Pacific region
  37. Resolusi2 PNI. (1954, 22 Desember). Merdeka, 2
  38. Rocamora, J. E. (1970). The Partai Nasional Indonesia 1963-1965. Indonesia (10): 143-181. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3350638
  39. S. Mangunsarkoro, “Sendi2 Marhaenisme”, Marhaen, 15 Juli 1952
  40. Soyomukti, N. (2012). Soekarno dan Cina: Nasionalisme Tionghoa dalam Revolusi Indonesia, Soekarno dan poros Jakarta-Peking, sikap Bung Karno terhadap etnis Tionghoa di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Garasi
  41. Susunan dan program Kabinet Mr. Burhanuddin Harahap. (1955, 27 Agustus). Merah Putih, No. 122/123 Tahun III
  42. Ufen, A. (2008). Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. The Pacific Review, 21(3), 327-350. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09512740802134174
  43. Utomo, I. N., Supriyono, A., Indriyanto, I. (2021). Bahaja Mengantjam: Ups and down of the New PNI movement 1931-1942. IHiS (Indonesian Historical Studies) 5(2), 148-160
  44. Van Biezen, Ingrid (2012). Constitutionalizing party democracy: The constitutive codification of political parties in Post-war Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 187-212

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.