DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2015.3718

Budaya Neo-Liberalisme: Konsumsi Dan Transformasi Inderawi (Sebuah Agenda Riset Etnografi Inderawi)

*Muhammad Zamzam Fauzanafi  -  Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Published: 1 Oct 2015.

Citation Format:
Abstract
-
Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Peran Kapabilitas Koordinasi dan Boundary-Spanner untuk Menguatkan Daya Saing Nasional di Era Globalisasi Neo-liberalisme: Epistemologi, Dampak, dan Solusi Islam Politik Pembangunan Industri Pertahanan Nasional di Era Global More recent articles
  1. Bourdieu, “The Essence of Neo-liberalism”, Le Monde Diplomatique,
  2. December, 1998. Classen, Constance,1997, “Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses”. International Social Science Journal, 153:
  3. -412
  4. Comaroff, Jean and John L. (ed.), 2001, Millineal Capitalism and The
  5. Culture Of Neo- liberalism, Duke University Press
  6. Csordas, Thomas J., ed., 1994. Embodiment and Experience: The
  7. Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge
  8. University Press
  9. Csordas, Thomas J., 2011, “Cultural Phenomenology; Embodiment,
  10. Sexual Difference, and Illness”, in A Companion To Anthropology of The
  11. Body and Embodiment, Mascia-Less (ed.), 2011, Willey-Blackwell
  12. Farquhar, Judith, 2002. Appetites: Food and Sex in Post-Socialist China
  13. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
  14. Michel Foucault, ”The Subject and Power,”, Afterward to Michel
  15. Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Hubert L
  16. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (Chicago, IL: Universi- ty of Chicago Press,
  17. , 208
  18. Foucault, 2008, The Birth of Biopolitics ; Lectures at The College De
  19. France: 1978-79, Edited by Michel Senellart, Palgrave Macmillan
  20. Freeman, Carla, 2011, “Embodying and Affecting Neo-liberalism” in A
  21. Companion To Anthropology of The Body and Embodiment, Mascia-Less
  22. (ed.), 2011, Willey- Blackwell
  23. Howes, David, 2003. Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in
  24. Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
  25. Howes, David, 2004. “Hyperaesthesia, or The Sensual Logic of Late
  26. Capitalism”. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. David
  27. Howes, ed. Oxford: Berg. Howes, David, “Debate Section: Response
  28. to Sarah Pink”. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale (2010)
  29. , 3 331–340
  30. Howes. David, 2011a, “Polysensoriality”, in A Companion To
  31. Anthropology of The Body and Embodiment, Mascia-Less (ed.), 2011,
  32. Willey-Blackwell
  33. Howes, David, 2011b, “Debate Section : Reply To Tim Ingold”. Social
  34. Anthropology/ Anthropologie Sociale (2011) 19, 3 318–322
  35. Hsu, Elisabeth, 2008, “The Senses and The Social: An Introduction”
  36. Ethos: Journal of Anthropology, vol. 73:4, dec. 2008 (pp. 433–443)
  37. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on
  38. livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge
  39. Ingold, Tim, 2011, “Debate Section : Worlds of sense and sensing the
  40. world: a response to Sarah Pink and David Howes”, Social
  41. Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale (2011)
  42. , 3 313–317
  43. MacDougall, David, 1998, Transcultural Cinema. Princeton, NJ:
  44. Princeton University Press
  45. MacDougall, David, 2005, The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography,
  46. and the Senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  47. Marcia-less, France E., 2011, Introduction, in A Companion To Anthropology of The Body and Embodiment, Mascia-Less (ed.), 2011,
  48. Willey-Blackwell
  49. Marx, Karl, 1988, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,
  50. translated by Martin Milligan, Promotheus Books
  51. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception, (trans. C
  52. Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  53. Nelson, Bryan, 2011, “Politics of the senses: Karl Marx and
  54. empirical subjectivity”, Subjectivity Vol. 4, 4, 395–412
  55. Pink, Sarah, 2007a, Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage
  56. Pink, Sarah, 2007b, “Walking with video”. Visual Studies 22(3): 240–
  57. Pink, Sarah, 2009, Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage
  58. Pink, Sarah, 2010, “Debate Section; The future of sensory
  59. anthropology/the anthropology of the senses”, Social
  60. Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale (2010) 18, 3 331–340
  61. Pink, Sarah, 2011, “Multimodality, multisensoriality and ethnographic
  62. knowing: social semiotics and the phenomenology of perception”
  63. Qualitative Research 2011 11:261 Priyono and Nugroho, 2001, Selamat Datang Jaman Baru, Sinar Harapan,
  64. Sinar Harapan, 5&6 September 2011
  65. Rudnyckyj, Daromir, 2009, “Spiritual Ecomonies: Islam and
  66. Neo-liberalism in Contemporary Indonesia”, Cultural Anthropology,
  67. Vol.24, Issue 1. Pp. 104-141
  68. Read, Jason, 2009, “A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and
  69. the Production of Subjectivity”, Foucault Studies, No 6, pp. 25-36,
  70. February 2009
  71. Rizky and Majidi, 2008, Neo-liberalisme Mecengkram Indonesia, E
  72. Publishing Company
  73. NB: tulisan ini pernah dimuat dalam Jurnal “RANAH”, Th. III No. 1 Mei

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.