DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v5i2.20348

Kapasitas Inovasi Program Dana Pembangunan Wilayah Kelurahan dalam Mendukung Percepatan dan Pemerataan Pembangunan Daerah

Siti Khaerunissa  -  Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia
Budi Hasanah  -  Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia
*Ahmad Sururi  -  Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Subdistrict Regional Development Fund Program (DPWK) is an innovation from the Cilegon Municipality Government which aims to improve the administrative function of subdistrict government in providing services to the community, encourage accelerated and equitable regional development and encourage the acceleration of regional poverty reduction. The aim of this research is to determine the innovation capacity of the Village Regional Development Fund Program (DPWK) in supporting accelerated and equitable development in Cilegon Municipality. This research method uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews, observation and documentation. The research results show that the Subdistrict Regional Development Fund Program has been running well, although there are still several problems such as limited community empowerment programs and only prioritizing regional infrastructure development programs and the low collaborative capacity of program implementers. Because the Cilegon Municipality government is paying more attention to community empowerment programs, intensive communication with the implementers of the Village Regional Development Fund (DPWK) program in Cilegon Municipality in creating ideal collaboration and prioritizing regional infrastructure development programs

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Kapasitas Inovasi Program Dana Pembangunan Wilayah Kelurahan dalam Mendukung Percepatan dan Pemerataan Pembangunan Daerah
Subject Capacity; Innovation; Development; Cilegon
Type Research Instrument
  Download (57KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Capacity; Innovation; Development; Cilegon

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN BERBASIS BUKTI TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN OPEN DEFECATION FREE (ODF) DI DESA MERI KABUPATEN PURBALINGGA COORDINATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN CONTROLLING UNLICENSED BUILDINGS IN BINJAI CITY Konsepsi Good Urban Governance Sebagai Kerangka Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan More recent articles
  1. Aida, Ade Nurul, dan Ervita Luluk Zahara. 2018. “Dana Kelurahan dan Tantangannya.” Buletin APBN Pusat Kajian Anggaran Badan Keahlian DPR RI 3 (21)
  2. Ancok, D. 2002. Outbound Management Training: Aplikasi Ilmu Perilaku dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jogjakarta: UII Pers. http://ancok.staff.ugm.ac.id/main/alive-3-faktor-organisasi-yang-inovatif-modal-organisasi/
  3. Anttiroiko, Ari Veikko. 2016. “City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities.” Sustainability 8 (9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090922
  4. BantenNews.co.id. 2018. “Pemkot Cilegon Klaim DPW-kel Berhasil Laksanakan Program Pembangunan.” www.BantenNews.co.id. 2018
  5. Batalli, Mirlinda. 2011. “Impact of Public Administration Innovations on Enhancing the Citizens’ Expectations.” International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2011.v1.25
  6. Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
  7. Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1174–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956539
  8. Habiyaremye, Alexis, Glenda Kruss, dan Irma Booyens. 2020. “Innovation for inclusive rural transformation: the role of the state.” Innovation and Development 10 (2): 155–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2019.1596368
  9. Haning, Mohamad Thahir, dan Mashuri H Tahili. 2018. “Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 191 Asian Association for Public Administration Annual Conference (AAPA 2018).” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 191 (Aapa): 197–209
  10. Hartley, Jean. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Services : Past and Present.” Public Money & Management, no. February 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
  11. Macmillan, Rob, dan Angela Ellis Paine. 2014. “Building Capabilities in the Voluntary Sector : What the evidence tells us (Third Sector Research Center).”
  12. Mardikanto, Theresia A., Dkk. 2014. Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat. Alfabeta: Bandung. Bandung: Alfabeta
  13. Miles, Matthew B., Michael A Huberman, dan Johnny Saldaña. 2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook.” In Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook, 3 ed. Arizona State University: SAGE Publications Inc
  14. Mulgan, Geoff. 2014. “Report: Innovation in the Public Sector: How Can Public Organisations Better Create, Improve and Adapt?” Nesta 1 (November): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2082
  15. Muluk, M.R. Khairul. 2008. Knowledge Management (Kunci Sukses Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah). Malang: Banyumedia
  16. Myhren, Per, Lars Witell, Anders Gustafsson, dan Heiko Gebauer. 2018. “Incremental and radical open service innovation.” Journal of Services Marketing 32 (2): 101–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-04-2016-0161
  17. Nurhidayatullah, Zahnudin, Dwi Prasetyo, Wisang Candra Bintari, Program Studi, Ilmu Administrasi, Negara Universitas, Muihammadiyah Sorong, et al. 2004. “Implementasi alokasi dana kelurahan dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat di kelurahan malawele kabupaten sorong,” 42–53
  18. OECD. 2012. “Innovation for Development A Discussion of the Issues and an Overview of Work Of the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.” https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344
  19. Pace, Wayne, R, dan F. Faules, Don. 2001. Komunikasi Organisasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan,. Bandung: Rosdakarya
  20. Paquet, Gilles. 2001. “Governance in the 21st Century, The New Governance, Subsidiarity and the Strategic State.”
  21. Pattyn, V, dan M Brans. 2015. “Organisational analytical capacity: Policy evaluation in Belgium.” Policy and Society 34: 183–96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1449403515000351
  22. Raudoh, Nurul. 2020. “Anggaran DPW Kelurahan naik 100 Milyar lebih.” Metro Cilegon, Januari 2020. http://bantenraya.com/berita/2020/01/09/12292/anggaran-dpwkel-naik-jadi-rp100-m-lebih
  23. Redaksi. 2016. “Pemkot Cilegon Luncurkan Program Dana Pembangunan Wilayah Kelurahan.” Banten Hits, 2016. https://bantenhits.com/2016/11/01/pemkot-cilegon-luncurkan-program-dana-pembangunan-wilayah-kelurahan/
  24. ———. 2019. “Hingga Agustus, Realisasi DPWKel Kota Cilegon Baru 55,01 Persen.” Radar Banten Online, 11 September 2019. https://www.radarbanten.co.id/hingga-agustus-realisasi-dpwkel-kota-cilegon-baru-5501-persen/
  25. Shen, Wei, dan Yao Wang. 2019. “Adaptive policy innovations and the construction of emission trading schemes in China: Taking stock and looking forward.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 30 (August): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.009
  26. Surubaru, Neculai Cristian. 2017. “Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13.” Regional Studies 51 (6): 844–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798
  27. Sururi, Ahmad. 2016. “Inovasi Kebijakan Publik (Tinjauan Konseptual dan Empiris).” Sawala Jurnal Administrasi Negara 4 (September-Desember 2016): 1–14
  28. ———. 2017. “Inovasi Kebijakan dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik Menuju Terwujudnya Good Public Policy Governance.” Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik 12 (2): 14. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v12i2.16236
  29. ———. 2018. “Collaborative Governance Sebagai Inovasi Kebijakan Strategis (Studi Revitalisasi Kawasan Wisata Cagar Budaya Banten Lama).” Humanika 25 (1): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v25i1.18482
  30. Temon. 2017. “Dana Pembangunan Kelurahan Kota Cilegon 2018 sebesar Rp. 82 Miliar.” Fakta Banten, 6 Februari 2017. https://faktabanten.co.id/blog/2017/02/06/dana-pembangunan-kelurahan-kota-cilegon-2018-sebesar-rp-82-miliar/
  31. Tyran, Jean-Robert, dan Rupert Sausgruber. 2003. “The Diffusion of Policy Innovations: An Experimental Investigation.” Discussion Paper No. 2003-14. www.fgn.unisg.ch/public/public.htm
  32. UNDESA. 2006. Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works. New York: United Nations Publication
  33. Witell, Lars, Hannah Snyder, Anders Gustafsson, Paul Fombelle, dan Per Kristensson. 2016. “Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis.” Journal of Business Research 69 (8): 2863–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.055
  34. Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research : design and methods. Fifth Edit. Lon: SAGE Publications Inc
  35. Zhang, Dongyang. 2020. “Innovation dynamics -what are the housing market uncertainty’s impacts.” International Review of Economics & Finance 70: 413–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.08.015

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.