BibTex Citation Data :
@article{ALJ6527, author = {Henny Juliani}, title = {Akibat Hukum Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Administrasi Pejabat Pemerintahan yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara}, journal = {Administrative Law and Governance Journal}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, year = {2019}, keywords = {}, abstract = { Abstract In a governmental implementation, government officers execute the function of regulating, serving, developing, empowering, and protecting to create people's welfare. In the implementation of the functions, government officers have the authority to make a decision and action. Therefore government officers are forbidden abusing their authority. Supervision on authority abuse of government officers is conducted by APIP. The result of supervision by APIP is comprised of without mistakes, with administrative mistakes, or with an administrative mistake that potentially causes state financial loss. Legal consequences of government officers on authority abuse, which cause state financial loss due to maladministration, become the responsibility of the government officers themselves, respectively, by returning the same amount of state financial loss due to authority abuse. Based on the APIP supervision report, the government officers accused of doing authority abuse, may request to be assessed to find out whether there is authority abuse or not when the government officers decree and execute their policies, before it becomes criminal proceeding. The request is proposed to PTUN based on Regulation of Royal Court Number 4 of 2015. Keywords: Administrative Authority Abuse , State Financial Loss Abstrak Dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, pejabat pemerintahan melaksanakan fungsi pengaturan, pelayanan, pembangunan, pemberdayaan, dan perlindungan bagi peningkatan kesejahteraan rakyat. Dalam melaksanakan fungsi tersebut pejabat pemerintahan memperoleh wewenang untuk mengambil keputusan dan/atau tindakan, oleh karena itu maka pejabat pemerintahan dilarang menyalahgunakan wewenang. Pengawasan terhadap larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang tersebut dilakukan oleh APIP. Hasil pengawasan APIP berupa: tidak terdapat kesalahan, terdapat kesalahan administratif, atau terdapat kesalahan administratif yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara. Akibat hukum pejabat pemerintahan terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara karena adanya kesalahan administratif/maladministratif menjadi tanggung jawab pribadi dengan mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara yang ditimbulkan sebagai akibat dari perbuatan yang dia lakukan. Berdasarkan hasil pengawasan APIP tersebut, pejabat pemerintahan yang dianggap telah melakukan penyalahgunaan wewenang, dapat mengajukan permohonan penilaian unsur ada tidaknya penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam mengeluarkan keputusan dan/atau tindakan kepada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015, sebelum adanya proses pidana. Kata Kunci: Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Administras i, Kerugian Keuangan Negara }, issn = {2621-2781}, pages = {598--614} doi = {10.14710/alj.v2i4.598-614}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/6527} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
In a governmental implementation, government officers execute the function of regulating, serving, developing, empowering, and protecting to create people's welfare. In the implementation of the functions, government officers have the authority to make a decision and action. Therefore government officers are forbidden abusing their authority. Supervision on authority abuse of government officers is conducted by APIP. The result of supervision by APIP is comprised of without mistakes, with administrative mistakes, or with an administrative mistake that potentially causes state financial loss. Legal consequences of government officers on authority abuse, which cause state financial loss due to maladministration, become the responsibility of the government officers themselves, respectively, by returning the same amount of state financial loss due to authority abuse. Based on the APIP supervision report, the government officers accused of doing authority abuse, may request to be assessed to find out whether there is authority abuse or not when the government officers decree and execute their policies, before it becomes criminal proceeding. The request is proposed to PTUN based on Regulation of Royal Court Number 4 of 2015.
Keywords: Administrative Authority Abuse, State Financial Loss
Abstrak
Dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, pejabat pemerintahan melaksanakan fungsi pengaturan, pelayanan, pembangunan, pemberdayaan, dan perlindungan bagi peningkatan kesejahteraan rakyat. Dalam melaksanakan fungsi tersebut pejabat pemerintahan memperoleh wewenang untuk mengambil keputusan dan/atau tindakan, oleh karena itu maka pejabat pemerintahan dilarang menyalahgunakan wewenang. Pengawasan terhadap larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang tersebut dilakukan oleh APIP. Hasil pengawasan APIP berupa: tidak terdapat kesalahan, terdapat kesalahan administratif, atau terdapat kesalahan administratif yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara. Akibat hukum pejabat pemerintahan terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara karena adanya kesalahan administratif/maladministratif menjadi tanggung jawab pribadi dengan mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara yang ditimbulkan sebagai akibat dari perbuatan yang dia lakukan. Berdasarkan hasil pengawasan APIP tersebut, pejabat pemerintahan yang dianggap telah melakukan penyalahgunaan wewenang, dapat mengajukan permohonan penilaian unsur ada tidaknya penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam mengeluarkan keputusan dan/atau tindakan kepada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015, sebelum adanya proses pidana.
Kata Kunci: Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Administrasi, Kerugian Keuangan Negara
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Administrative Law & Governance Journal published by State Administrative Law Department Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Administrative Law & Governance Journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Administrative Law & Governance Journal]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Muhamad Azhar (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Campus Prof. Dr. Satjipto Raharjo, S.H,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
Administrative Law and Governance Journal (e-ISSN 2621-2781) published by the State Administrative Law Department
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
alj@live.undip.ac.id
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj