BibTex Citation Data :
@article{ALJ5097, author = {Sonhaji Sonhaji}, title = {Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Kesalahan Berat Pekerja}, journal = {Administrative Law and Governance Journal}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, year = {2019}, keywords = {}, abstract = { The result of this research shows that the case of serious mistake did by worker/laborer in Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation has gone through bipartite, mediation and conciliation processes. However, all three of them did not reach an agreement and Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation filed a lawsuit against the worker/laborer to the Industrial Relations Court. Palangkaraya Industrial Relations Court’s Verdict Number 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R decides that the workers have committed a serious mistake and are subjected to termination of employment but the employer still has to pay their deferred obligation to the worker/laborer. Despite the termination of the employment due to the serious mistake requested by the employer to the Industrial Relations Court is granted, but within the verdict, there are still many legal loopholes. Keywords: Employment, Laborer Serious Mistake, PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama Abstrak Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa kasus mengenai kesalahan berat pekerja/buruh di PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama telah melalui proses bipartit, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Namun ketiganya tidak mencapai kesepakatan dan PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Palangkaraya Nomor 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R menyatakan bahwa pekerja/buruh telah melakukan kesalahan berat dan dijatuhi pemutusan hubungan kerja namun pengusaha tetap harus membayarkan kewajibannya yang tertunda terhadap pekerja/buruh. Meskipun pemutusan hubungan kerja akibat kesalahan berat yang dimintakan penetapannya oleh pengusaha kepada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dikabulkan, namun di dalam putusan pengadilan tersebut masih terdapat banyak celah hukum. Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Kesalahan Berat Pekerja PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama }, issn = {2621-2781}, pages = {60--78} doi = {10.14710/alj.v2i1.60-78}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/5097} }
Refworks Citation Data :
The result of this research shows that the case of serious mistake did by worker/laborer in Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation has gone through bipartite, mediation and conciliation processes. However, all three of them did not reach an agreement and Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation filed a lawsuit against the worker/laborer to the Industrial Relations Court. Palangkaraya Industrial Relations Court’s Verdict Number 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R decides that the workers have committed a serious mistake and are subjected to termination of employment but the employer still has to pay their deferred obligation to the worker/laborer. Despite the termination of the employment due to the serious mistake requested by the employer to the Industrial Relations Court is granted, but within the verdict, there are still many legal loopholes.
Keywords: Employment, Laborer Serious Mistake, PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama
Abstrak
Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa kasus mengenai kesalahan berat pekerja/buruh di PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama telah melalui proses bipartit, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Namun ketiganya tidak mencapai kesepakatan dan PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Palangkaraya Nomor 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R menyatakan bahwa pekerja/buruh telah melakukan kesalahan berat dan dijatuhi pemutusan hubungan kerja namun pengusaha tetap harus membayarkan kewajibannya yang tertunda terhadap pekerja/buruh. Meskipun pemutusan hubungan kerja akibat kesalahan berat yang dimintakan penetapannya oleh pengusaha kepada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dikabulkan, namun di dalam putusan pengadilan tersebut masih terdapat banyak celah hukum.
Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Kesalahan Berat Pekerja PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Administrative Law & Governance Journal published by State Administrative Law Department Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Administrative Law & Governance Journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Administrative Law & Governance Journal]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Muhamad Azhar (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Campus Prof. Dr. Satjipto Raharjo, S.H,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
Administrative Law and Governance Journal (e-ISSN 2621-2781) published by the State Administrative Law Department
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
alj@live.undip.ac.id
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj
