BibTex Citation Data :
@article{ALJ5082, author = {Budi Ispriyarso}, title = {Kelemahan Lembaga Keberatan Pajak}, journal = {Administrative Law and Governance Journal}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, year = {2019}, keywords = {}, abstract = { Abstract Tax disputes can occur between taxpayers or tax insurers with the government, among others because of differences in the amount of tax payable. One of the legal efforts that can be taken by taxpayers in the event of a tax dispute is an \"Objection\" legal effort. This objection is essentially a legal effort that is outside the Tax Court to appeal for justice in a tax dispute. The problem, what weaknesses are there in the objection institutions that exist today. Some of the weaknesses in this tax objection institution include the position within the Directorate General of Taxes or precisely a unit/part that is part of the Tax Service Office (KPP) or the Tax Office. Its position under the Directorate General of Taxation is what has caused criticism from many parties, especially with regard to independence in deciding a case, the Independent is doubtful, there is a conflict of interest. Another disadvantage is the provision that contains a \"threat\" to taxpayers in filing objections, namely a fine of 50% of the amount of tax payable after deducting the amount of tax paid if the decision rejects the objection filed by the taxpayer or partially grants. Keywords : Objection, tax dispute, the taxpayer Abstrak Sengketa pajak dapat terjadi antara wajib pajak atau penanggung pajak dengan pemerintah , antara lain karena perbedaan penghitungan besarnya pajak yang terutang. Salah satu upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh wajib pajak dalam hal terjadi sengketa pajak adalah upaya hukum “Keberatan”. Keberatan ini pada hakekatnya merupakan upaya hukum yang berada diluar Pengadilan Pajak untuk memohon keadilan dalam sengketa pajak. Permasalahanya, Kelemahan-kelemahan apa yang terdapat dalam lembaga keberatan yang ada saat ini. Beberapa kelemahan yang terdapat dalam lembaga keberatan pajak ini antara lain adalah kedudukannya yang berada di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak atau tepatnya suatu unit/bagian yang merupakan bagian yang ada pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) atau Kanwil Pajak. Kedudukannya yang berada di bawah Direktorat Jenderal Pajak inilah yang menimbulkan kritikan dari banyak pihak khususnya berkaitan dengan keindependenanya dalam memutus suatu perkara, Keindependenanya diragukan, ada conflict of interest . Kelemahan lainnya adalah adanya ketentuan yang mengandung “ancaman” terhadap wajib pajak dalam pengajuan keberatan yaitu adanya denda sebesar 50 % dari jumlah pajak terutang setelah dikurangi jumlah pajak yang telah dibayar, apabila keputusan menolak keberatan yang diajukan wajib pajak atau mengabulkan sebagian. Kata kunci: Keberatan, sengketa pajak, wajib pajak }, issn = {2621-2781}, pages = {248--258} doi = {10.14710/alj.v2i2.248-258}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/5082} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
Tax disputes can occur between taxpayers or tax insurers with the government, among others because of differences in the amount of tax payable. One of the legal efforts that can be taken by taxpayers in the event of a tax dispute is an "Objection" legal effort. This objection is essentially a legal effort that is outside the Tax Court to appeal for justice in a tax dispute. The problem, what weaknesses are there in the objection institutions that exist today. Some of the weaknesses in this tax objection institution include the position within the Directorate General of Taxes or precisely a unit/part that is part of the Tax Service Office (KPP) or the Tax Office. Its position under the Directorate General of Taxation is what has caused criticism from many parties, especially with regard to independence in deciding a case, the Independent is doubtful, there is a conflict of interest. Another disadvantage is the provision that contains a "threat" to taxpayers in filing objections, namely a fine of 50% of the amount of tax payable after deducting the amount of tax paid if the decision rejects the objection filed by the taxpayer or partially grants.
Keywords: Objection, tax dispute, the taxpayer
Abstrak
Sengketa pajak dapat terjadi antara wajib pajak atau penanggung pajak dengan pemerintah , antara lain karena perbedaan penghitungan besarnya pajak yang terutang. Salah satu upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh wajib pajak dalam hal terjadi sengketa pajak adalah upaya hukum “Keberatan”. Keberatan ini pada hakekatnya merupakan upaya hukum yang berada diluar Pengadilan Pajak untuk memohon keadilan dalam sengketa pajak. Permasalahanya, Kelemahan-kelemahan apa yang terdapat dalam lembaga keberatan yang ada saat ini. Beberapa kelemahan yang terdapat dalam lembaga keberatan pajak ini antara lain adalah kedudukannya yang berada di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak atau tepatnya suatu unit/bagian yang merupakan bagian yang ada pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) atau Kanwil Pajak. Kedudukannya yang berada di bawah Direktorat Jenderal Pajak inilah yang menimbulkan kritikan dari banyak pihak khususnya berkaitan dengan keindependenanya dalam memutus suatu perkara, Keindependenanya diragukan, ada conflict of interest. Kelemahan lainnya adalah adanya ketentuan yang mengandung “ancaman” terhadap wajib pajak dalam pengajuan keberatan yaitu adanya denda sebesar 50 % dari jumlah pajak terutang setelah dikurangi jumlah pajak yang telah dibayar, apabila keputusan menolak keberatan yang diajukan wajib pajak atau mengabulkan sebagian.
Kata kunci: Keberatan, sengketa pajak, wajib pajak
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Administrative Law & Governance Journal published by State Administrative Law Department Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Administrative Law & Governance Journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Administrative Law & Governance Journal]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Muhamad Azhar (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Campus Prof. Dr. Satjipto Raharjo, S.H,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
Administrative Law and Governance Journal (e-ISSN 2621-2781) published by the State Administrative Law Department
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
alj@live.undip.ac.id
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj