DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ajlm.2022.14271

Employee Engagement Comparative Study of Baby Boomers, x, and y Generation Workers in Transportation and Logistics Delivery service Companies Semarang

*Nurul Imani Kurniawati  -  Logistic Management and Administration, Vocational School, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Nurul Imani Kurniawati
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Studies related to workers across generations have caught the attention of many researchers. For the first time in history, the company is inhabited by workers from various generations to be able to work side by side. How workers in each generation interact with and influence the organization they work for is still an interesting research gap to study. However, the studies examining employee engagement in the Baby Boomers generation, X generation and Y generation in transportation companies and logistics delivery services  are still limited. Therefore, this study aims to conduct research on the differences in employee engagement in the Baby Boomers generation, X generation and Y generation in transportation and logistics delivery service companies in Semarang. To fulfill this goal, the study was conducted on workers who were grouped by generation according to age or year of birth. To these respondents, employee engagement was measured which was then carried out a comparative test to determine the significance of differences in employee engagement in each generation. The results of the statistical tests carried out show that statistically it can be proven that workers from the Baby Boomer generation, X generation and Y generation have different employee engagement
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: employee engagement, engagement, multi generation, generation workers, in transportation and logistics delivery service

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Quantum Computing in Supply Chain Management State of the Art and Research Directions Environmental Uncertainty Factor, Incoterm and Implication For A Strategic Alliance In Freight Forwarder Companies Case Study In Indonesia Employee Engagement Comparative Study of Baby Boomers, x, and y Generation Workers in Transportation and Logistics Delivery service Companies Semarang More recent articles
  1. AARP (2007). Leading a Multigenerational Workforce. Washington, DC: Author
  2. AHA Committee (2013), Managing an Intergenerational Workforce: Strategies for Health Care Transformation, A Report from the AHA Committee on Performance Improvement
  3. Alsop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up: How the millennial generation is shaping up the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  4. Cic, Ziva Veingerl & Simona Sarotar Zizek (2017), Intergenerational Cooperation at the Workplace from the Management Perspective, Our Economy, 63 (3), 47-59
  5. Crumpacker, M & J.D Crumpacker (2007). Succession Planning and Generational Stereotypes: Should HR Consider Age-Based Values and Attitudes a Relevant Factor or a Passing fad?. Public Personnel Management, 36 (4), 349-369
  6. Dale Carnegie (2016), https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read159360/dale-carnegie-hanya-25-persen-milenial-terlibat-sepenuhnya-dengan-perusahaan.html
  7. DelCampo, R., Haggerty, L., & Haney, M. (2011). Managing the Multi-Generational Workforce: From the Gi Generation to The Millennials. Burlington: Gower Publishing
  8. Engage2Excel. (2016). ‘Embracing the Diversity of Today’s Multigenerational Workforce’. Retrieved from https://www.engage2excel.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/E2E_GenWorkforce_WP3.V3.0_EMAIL-3.pdf
  9. Erickson, T. (2008). Is gen y really all that narcissistic? Harvard Business Review Discussions http://blogs.hbr.org/erickson/2008/02is_gen_y_really_narcissistic.html
  10. Gallup. (2013). State of the Global Market Place: Employee Engagement Insights for Business Leaders Worldwide’. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/services/178517/state-global-workplace.aspx
  11. Howe, N & W. Strauss (2000), Millennials Rising, Vintage Books, New York
  12. Gallup (2013), How Employee Engagement Drives Growth. Gallup, Business Journal HBR. (2013). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Performance. Harvard Business School Publishing
  13. Jeffrey, H. (2015b). Fast Take on Talent Innovation-Today’s Multi-generational Workforce, PwC. Re-trieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/people-management/assets/pwc-multi-generational-workforce.pdf
  14. Jeffrey, J. (2015a). Employee Engagement Landscape Study: Championing Greatness or Captur-ing Mediocrity PwC. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/mt/en/publications/people-and-organisation/pwc-hrs-employee-engagement-landscape-2015.pdf
  15. Lockwood, N.R (2007), Leveraging employee engagement forcompetitive advantage HR strategicrole. SHRM Research, 1-11
  16. Lockwood, N.R (2003), Work Life Balance: Challenges and Solutions, Society for Human Resource Management. Research Quarterly, 2, 1-12
  17. Moretti, M & N. Postruznik (2011), Stress Management And Employee Engagement: A Case Study. Europe : Armida Publications
  18. Myers, Karen K dan Kamyab Sadaghiani (2010), Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25 (2), 225-238
  19. Schaufeli, W. B., & A.B Bakker (2010). Defining and Measuring Work engagement: Bringing Clarity to the Concept. Dalam A. B. Bakker, & M. Leiter, Work engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (hal. 10-24). New York: Psychology Press
  20. Schaufeli, W.B., and A.B. Bakker (2004), Job Demands, Job Resources and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-sample Study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315
  21. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES –Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test Manual. Unpublished Manuscript: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University
  22. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES–Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test manual. Unpublished manuscript. Netherlands: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.