DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ajlm.2022.14230

Environmental Uncertainty Factor, Incoterm and Implication For A Strategic Alliance In Freight Forwarder Companies Case Study In Indonesia

*Ahmad Sugiono  -  Management Science Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Education University, Indonesia
Agus Rahayu  -  Management Science Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Education University, Indonesia
Lili Adi Wibowo  -  Management Science Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Education University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Sugiono, Agus Rahayu, Lili Adi Wibowo
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The study analyzes the effect of environmental uncertainty and incoterms on strategic alliances. The population in this study is a freight forwarder company on the island of Java that has a global alliance. The research sample is 50 companies engaged in international freight forwarders. Based on answers from respondents were analyzed according to the research model developed from the theoretical framework using the structural equation model Smart-PLS approach. The analysis results show that environmental uncertainty and Incoterm positively and significantly affect strategic alliances. The alliance strategy will impact when the main priority is the risk-sharing aspect, the risk management factor from the incoterm aspect, and the market turbulence on the environmental uncertainty factor. Novelty in this study is the positive impact of Incoterm on the alliance strategy, especially for International freight forwarders. This research contributes to the factors considered in strategic alliances in the freight forwarder industry. It also contributes to the company's strategy, especially sales managers, to pay attention to international trade terms in segmenting and selecting target consumers to be more effective in improving alliance performance. The limitations of this study include 1) The sample size used is only a small number of companies engaged in international Freight Forwarder services, only 50 companies; 2) The data used in this research is through the distribution of questionnaires based on perceptual analysis units; 3) Other factors that are outside the model are not all studied, while the possibility of these factors can affect the existing significance test.

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY FACTOR, INCOTERM AND IMPLICATION FOR A STRATEGIC ALLIANCE IN FREIGHT FORWARDER COMPANIES CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (154KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Environmental uncertainty, Incoterm, Logistics, Strategic Alliance, Supply Chain

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Application Analysis: Unit Price Contract System In The Procurement Of Goods And Services At Pt Xyz Impact Analysis Of Covid-19 Pandemic On E-Commerce In Indonesia Business And Recovery Strategies In The Era Of New Normal Quantum Computing in Supply Chain Management State of the Art and Research Directions More recent articles
  1. Adhikara, M.F.A., Diana, N., Basjir, M., 2022. Organizational Performance in Environmental Uncertainty on the Indonesian Healthcare Industry: A Path Analysis. Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 11, 365
  2. Alford, P., Duan, Y., 2018. Understanding collaborative innovation from a dynamic capabilities perspective. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag
  3. Ali, I., Arslan, A., Chowdhury, M., Khan, Z., Tarba, S.Y., 2022. Reimagining global food value chains through effective resilience to COVID-19 shocks and similar future events: A dynamic capability perspective. J. Bus. Res. 141, 1–12
  4. Andrevski, G., 2009. Competitive Strategy, Alliance Networks, and Firm Competitive Strategy,
  5. Alliance Networks, and Firm Performance Performance
  6. Bergami, R., Tichá, L., 2022. Managing Incoterms® 2020 export risks. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 23, 255–273
  7. Branch, M.A.E., Branch, A.E., 2012. Elements of Shipping, Elements of Shipping. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929971
  8. Cacciolatti, L., Rosli, A., Ruiz-Alba, J.L., Chang, J., 2020. Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. J. Bus. Res. 106, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047
  9. Calantone, R.J., di Benedetto, C.A., Bhoovaraghavan, S., 1994. Examining the relationship between degree of innovation and new product success. J. Bus. Res. 30, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90033-7
  10. Chen, H., Tian, Z., 2022. Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach. J. Bus. Res. 139, 184–193
  11. Chen, J., Shu, W., Wang, X., Sial, M.S., Sehleanu, M., Badulescu, D., 2022. The impact of environmental uncertainty on corporate innovation: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010334
  12. Clark, T., Varadarajan, P.R., Pride, W.M., 1994. Environmental management: The construct and research propositions. J. Bus. Res. 29, 23–38
  13. Del Rosal, I., 2016. Factors influencing the choice of delivery terms used in Spanish seaborne container trade. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 8, 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2016.076261
  14. Deng, M., Fang, X., Tian, Z., Luo, W., 2022. The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability 14, 4902
  15. Dollinger, M.J., 1990. The evolution of collective strategies in fragmented industries. Acad. Manag. Rev. 15, 266–285
  16. Dollinger, M.J., Golden, P.A., 1992. Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environmental effects and performance. J. Manage. 18, 695–715
  17. Elmuti, D., Kathawala, Y., 2001. An overview of strategic alliances. Manag. Decis
  18. Emami, A., Welsh, D.H.B., Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A., 2022. Examining the relationship between strategic alliances and the performance of small entrepreneurial firms in telecommunications. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00781-3
  19. Gardner, B.D.L., 2012. How to Use International Trade Terms for Competitive Advantage & Financial Gain
  20. Ghorbani, M., Acciaro, M., Transchel, S., Cariou, P., 2022. Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda. Marit. Econ. Logist. 1–27
  21. Giunipero, L.C., Eltantawy, R.A., 2004. Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management
  22. approach. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag
  23. Govindarajan, V., 1984. Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 9, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90002-3
  24. Grant, R.M., 1991. Grant_1991. Knowl. Strateg. 3–24
  25. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 68, 79– 91
  26. Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Ireland, R.D., 2001. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Manage. 27, 679– 690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00118-0
  27. Hidayat, A., Hidayat, A., 2013. STRATEGIC ALLIANCES TO DEVELOP A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ON SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMEs) IN INDONESIA. Widyariset 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14203/widyariset.16.1.2013.1-10
  28. Hien, N., Laporte, G., Roy, J., 2014. Business Environment Factors, Incoterms Selection and Export Performance. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J. 2, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm040017
  29. Hoffmann, W.H., Schlosser, R., 2001. Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium- sized enterprises—An empirical survey. Long Range Plann. 34, 357–381
  30. Hohenstein, N.-O., 2022. Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers’ performance. Int. J. Logist. Manag
  31. Huuhka, H., 2019. Effective use of incoterms in the case company
  32. Inkpen, A.C., 2006. [hanbook] 14 Strategic Alliances. Blackwell Handb. Strateg. Manag. 403–427
  33. International Chamber of Commerce, 2011. Incoterm 2010 : ICC Rules for The Use of Domestic and International Trade Term
  34. Jang, Y., Lee, W., 2022. Never have a crisis like COVID-19, in: SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, p. 1018
  35. Jaworski, B.J., Kohli, A.K., 1993. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. 57, 53–70
  36. Judge, W.Q., Dooley, R., 2006. Strategic alliance outcomes: A transaction-cost economics perspective. Br. J. Manag. 17, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00441.x
  37. Jüttner, U., 2005. Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. Int. J. Logist. Manag
  38. Jüttner, U., Peck, H., Christopher, M., 2003. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 6, 197–210
  39. Kadłubska, J., 2016. The Significance of the Incoterms Rules in the Freight Forwarding Services Market. World Sci. News 57, 97–105
  40. Keats, B.W., Hitt, M.A., 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 31, 570–598
  41. Laguir, I., Modgil, S., Bose, I., Gupta, S., Stekelorum, R., 2022. Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–25
  42. Lee, E., 2019. Improving a Firm’s Performance within a Strategic Shipping Alliance. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 35, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.008
  43. McGinnis, M.A., Kohn, J.W., 1993. Logistics strategy, organizational environment, and time competitiveness. J. Bus. Logist. 14, 1
  44. Mikami, K., Bird, A., 2022. Opportunism and trust in cross-national lateral collaboration: the Renault-Nissan Alliance and a theory of equity-trust. J. World Bus. 57, 101286
  45. Muafi, 2000. Mengelola Persaingan Kompetitif Melalui Aliansi Strategis. Telaah Bisnis 1 No 2, 133– 146
  46. Muange, R., Maru, L.C., 2015. Strategic alliances on performance of retail firms in Nairobi county, Kenya. TQM J. 27, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2015-0075
  47. Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., Churilov, L., 2009. Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. J. Oper. Manag. 27, 154–168
  48. Norrman, A., Jansson, U., 2004. Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag
  49. Ochie, C., Nyuur, R.B., Ludwig, G., Cunningham, J.A., 2022. Dynamic capabilities and organizational ambidexterity: New strategies from emerging market multinational enterprises in Nigeria. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev
  50. Peck, H., 2006. Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 9, 127–142
  51. Porter, M.E., 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 12, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
  52. Prasetya, H., 2008. Aliansi strategis dalam membangun keunggulan bersaing.pdf. Diponegoro University
  53. Rusinov, I., Ouami, A., 2022. Key Profitability Factors for Strategic Alliances in Shipping Industry, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 42043
  54. Saffu, K., Mamman, A., 2000. Contradictions in international tertiary strategic alliances: The case from down under. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag
  55. Schaefer, T.J., 2017. Incoterms ® Use in Buyer-Seller Relationships : a Mixed Methods Study. Dissertations 270
  56. Soh, S., 2017. The Impact of Incoterms Selection and Supply Chain Finance on the Working Capital of a Company: A Case Study Analysis
  57. Stojanović, Đ., Ivetić, J., 2020. Possibilities of using Incoterms clauses in a country logisticsperformance assessment and benchmarking. Transp. Policy 98, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.012
  58. Stojanović, Đ.M., Ivetić, J., 2020. Macrologistic performance and logistics commitments in sales contracts in international supply chains. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 31, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2018-0323
  59. Sun, C.-C., 2022. Strategic Alliance Pattern Evaluation Model for Taiwan’s Machine Tool Industry: A Hierarchical DEMATEL Method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022
  60. Surakarsa, J., Amchang, C., Sawatwong, N., 2020. Decision-Making on Incoterms 2020 of Automotive Parts Manufacturers in Thailand. J. Asian Finance. Econ. Bus. 7, 461–470. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.461
  61. Svensson, G., 2004. Key areas, causes and contingency planning of corporate vulnerability in supply chains: A qualitative approach. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag
  62. Swamidass, P.M., Newell, W.T., 1987. Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model. Manage. Sci. 33, 509–524
  63. The International Chamber of Commerce, 2020. ICC Rules for the Use of Domestic and International Trade Terms, 723E ed. International Chamber and Commerce Indonesia
  64. Todeva, E., Knoke, D., 2005. Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Manag. Decis. 43, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510572533
  65. Trkman, P., McCormack, K., 2009. Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 119, 247–258
  66. Wall, W.P., 2022. Strategic Alliance—Strength in Numbers, in: Global Competitiveness. Springer, pp. 55–66
  67. Waqas, U., Abd Rahman, A., Ismail, N.W., Kamal Basha, N., Umair, S., 2022. Influence of supply chain risk management and its mediating role on supply chain performance: perspectives from an agri-fresh produce. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–29
  68. Wheelen, T., 2000. J. dan Hunger. J. David
  69. Wheelen, T.L., Hunger, J.D., 2012. Concepts in strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability. Pearson
  70. Xu, L., Shi, J., Chen, J., 2022. Agency encroachment and information sharing: cooperation and competition in freight forwarding market. Marit. Policy Manag. 1–14
  71. Yaakub, S., Szu, L.Y., Arbak, S., Halim, N.A., 2018. INCOTERMS Selection Factors and Its Effect on Export Performance The International Commercial Terms ( Incoterms ), introduced and governed by International Chamber of Commerce ( ICC ) are standard trade terms used in international and domestic sales contr 2

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.