skip to main content

Pengaplikasian Radiografi Periapikal pada Perawatan Saluran Akar : Studi Telaah Literatur

Application of Periapical Radiography in Root Canal Treatment: A Literature Review

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 27 Jun 2025; Revised: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 30 Aug 2025; Available online: 1 Sep 2025; Published: 1 Dec 2025.
Open Access Copyright 2025 Jennifer Lois Violita Malau, Keizha Allysia Nabila, Widiani Harrista, Regina Amara Ginting, Tassa Kusuma Arya Putri, Jatu Rachel Keshena
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Background: Periapical radiography is an essential imaging modality in endodontic practice due to its ability to visualize root canal anatomy and periapical structures in detail, with low cost and minimal radiation exposure. While CBCT delivers comprehensive 3D views, periapical radiography is still widely relied upon in routine dental procedures for its consistent performance in diagnosis and treatment monitoring. This paper seeks to systematically evaluate its application in root canal therapy and measure its diagnostic accuracy relative to CBCT. Methods: A literature review was conducted over a 14-day period using relevant keywords to search articles from PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Selected articles met inclusion criteria based on publication year, topic relevance, and methodological appropriateness. Results: The findings indicate that periapical radiography is highly effective during diagnostic stages, working length determination, obturation assessment, and post-treatment follow-up in root canal therapy. Although CBCT demonstrates superiority in detecting accessory canals, root fractures, and hidden lesions with higher sensitivity, it is limited by higher costs, greater radiation exposure, and a risk of overdiagnosis. Periapical radiography continues to exhibit high reliability when performed with proper technique. Conclusion: Periapical radiography is effective throughout all stages of root canal treatment and remains the primary imaging modality due to its accuracy, affordability, and low radiation exposure. CBCT offers superior imaging in complex cases; however, its use should be selective and aligned with the ALADAIP principle. The choice of imaging should be based on clinical needs, effectiveness, and cost-efficiency.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Radiograph, Periapical Radiograph; Root Canal Treatment

Article Metrics:

  1. Astuti ER, Wahyuni OR, Mulyani SWM. Pelatihan Object Localization Teknik Radiografi Intra Oral Pada Anggota Perhimpunan Ahli Radiografer Indonesia (PARI) Cabang Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia 2022; 2: 287–290
  2. Kusumawati KY, Yanuaryska RD, Shantiningsih RR. The accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography on determining the working length in endodontic treatment: narrative review. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI) 2022; 6: 41–48
  3. Pamadya S, Aryanto M, Hayati N, et al. Evaluasi jumlah saluran akar gigi premolar pertama atas menggunakan teknik radiografi periapikal pararel dan Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI) 2021; 5: 7
  4. Fernández R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, et al. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. Journal of Endodontics 2013; 39: 1097–1103
  5. Alaidarous FA, Alamoudi RA, Baeisa DS, et al. Prevalence of Periapical Radiolucency and Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Cureus Journal of Medical Science 2023; 15: e33302
  6. Kazimierczak W, Kazimierczak N, Issa J, et al. Endodontic Treatment Outcomes in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images—Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of AI. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024; 13: 4116
  7. Patel S, Brady E, Wilson R, et al. The detection of vertical root fractures in root filled teeth with periapical radiographs and CBCT scans. International Endodontics Journal 2013; 46: 1140–1152
  8. Sousa TO, Haiter-Neto F, Nascimento EHL, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Identifying Root Canal Configuration of Human Premolars. Journal of Endodontics 2017; 43: 1176–1179
  9. Setzer FC, Lee S-M. Radiology in Endodontics. Dental Clinical North America 2021; 65: 475–486
  10. Zakaria H, Duarte Puerto C, Al Basri H, et al. Efficacy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Periapical (PA) Radiography in Endodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. Journal of Diagnostic Treatment Oral Maxillofacial Pathology 2018; 2: 60–80
  11. Song D, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al. Comparing cone-beam computed tomography with periapical radiography for assessing root canal obturation in vivo using microsurgical findings as validation. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2017; 46: 20160463
  12. Mahasneh SA, Horner K, Cunliffe J, et al. Guidelines on radiographic imaging as part of root canal treatment: a systematic review with a focus on review imaging after treatment. International Endodontics Journal 2018; 51 Suppl 3: e238–e249
  13. Yapp KE, Suleiman M, Brennan P, et al. Periapical Radiography versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontic Disease Detection: A Free-response, Factorial Study. Journal of Endodontics 2023; 49: 419–429
  14. Balasundaram A, Shah P, Hoen MM, et al. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Predicting Treatment Decision for Periapical Lesions: A Clinical Study. International Journal of Dentistry 2012; 2012: 920815
  15. Bennasar C, Nadal-Martínez A, Arroyo S, et al. Integrating Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Predicting Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Outcomes Using Two-Dimensional Periapical Radiographs. Diagnostics 2025; 15: 1009
  16. Ng JM, Lee YY, Chippagiri P, Ahanin E, Parolia A. Effect of quality of radiographs taken during root canal treatment on technical quality of root canal fillings and endodontic outcome. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2025;50(1):rde.2025.50.e3. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e3
  17. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, et al. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. International Endodontics Journal 2012; 45: 711–723
  18. Yapp K, Brennan P, Ekpo E. Endodontic disease detection: digital periapical radiography versus cone-beam computed tomography—a systematic review. Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jul;8(4):041205. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.041205
  19. Stera G, Giusti M, Magnini A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and panoramic radiography in the detection of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. La radiology medical 2024; 129: 1682–1695
  20. Mehta D, Coleman A, Lessani M. Success and failure of endodontic treatment: predictability, complications, challenges and maintenance. British Dental Journal 2025; 238: 527–535
  21. Pawar BA, Pawar AM, Atram J, et al. Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 3859
  22. Khanna R, Handa A, Virk RK, et al. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Procedural Errors during Preparation of Curved Root Canals with Hand and Rotary Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2017; 8: 411–415
  23. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics 2010; 36: 1–15
  24. Hadzic A, Urschler M, Press J-NA, et al. Evaluating a Periapical Lesion Detection CNN on a Clinically Representative CBCT Dataset-A Validation Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023; 13: 197
  25. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1998; 27: 3–11
  26. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, et al. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. International Endodontics Journal 2007; 40: 818–830
  27. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2017; 51: S102–S121
  28. Castillo C, Steffens T, Sim L, et al. The effect of clinical information on radiology reporting: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Radiation Science 2021; 68: 60–74
  29. Liu J, Liu X, Shao Y, et al. Periapical lesion detection in periapical radiographs using the latest convolutional neural network ConvNeXt and its integrated models. Scientific Reports 2024; 14: 25429
  30. Shokri A, Salemi F, Taherpour T, et al. Is cone-beam computed tomography more accurate than periapical radiography for detection of vertical root fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Imaging 2024; 24: 286

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.