skip to main content

Connotation and Myth: Language Expression of Gen Z through WhatsApp Emoticon

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universtitas Tidar, Jalan Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang 56116, Indonesia

Received: 15 Feb 2024; Accepted: 1 Apr 2024; Published: 30 Apr 2024.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Compared to previous generations, Generation Z (Gen Z) lives in a different lifestyle and culture. Since their youth, Gen Z cannot be separated from digital and technological aspects in their daily life. In communication, it can be assumed that Gen Z is familiar with the use of WhatsApp as their primary communication medium. It is proven that in the period of the Covid-19 pandemic, WhatsApp was crucial as a communication medium by Gen Z. On the other hand, communication patterns in digital space are quite different from traditional verbal communication. There are many features in WhatsApp, one of them is emoticon features, that make the process of language interpretation become ambiguous and multi-interpretative. This study aims to uncover that language phenomenon, especially by analysing connotations and myths represented in WhatsApp emoticons used by Gen Z, using the perspective of Roland Barthes’ semiotic theory. The results of this research show that through the WhatsApp emoticons used by Gen Z, it can be concluded that WhatsApp emoticons are often used arbitrarily by Gen Z, which then implies certain connotative meanings, which are also related to the context of the conversation being built. The myth that underlies this phenomenon is the cultural background of Gen Z as a generation that cannot be separated from technological aspects, thus allowing for their authentic uniqueness in language styles, caused by the mediated language through digital platforms such as WhatsApp.

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Connotation, Myth, Gen Z, Semiotic, WhatsApp Emoticon.

Article Metrics:

  1. Ajmain. (2020). Impacts and Effective Communication on Generation Z in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 1(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v1i2.204
  2. Anwar, T. M. (2019). Phenomenology of Communication of Generation Z in Pekanbaru. Komunikator, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.111015
  3. Benítez-Márquez, M. D., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., Bermúdez-González, G., & Núñez-Rydman, E. S. (2022). Generation Z Within the Workforce and in the Workplace: A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736820
  4. Bressler. (1994). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall, Inc
  5. Daulay, S., Rangkuti, R., & Nabila, A. (2023). A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF SMILEYS EMOTICON IN WHATSAPP. Lexeme: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 200–206
  6. Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1–7
  7. Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s Generation Z. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 245–252
  8. Hanafi, Y., D, M. B., & Hadijah, H. (2021). A Semiotic Analysis Of Emoticon Symbols on Whatsapp Messenger In Students’ Chat Activies. Tamaddun, 20(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v20i1.92
  9. Hendrastomo, G., & Januarti, N. E. (2023). The Characteristics of Generation Z Students and Implications for Future Learning Methods. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(2), 484. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7745
  10. Lanier, K. (2017). 5 things HR professionals need to know about Generation Z. Strategic HR Review, 16(6), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-08-2017-0051
  11. Lev. (2021). Generation z: Characteristics and challenges to entering the world of work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 23(1), 107–115
  12. Lustyantie, N. (2012). PENDEKATAN SEMIOTIK MODEL ROLAND BARTHES DALAM KARYA SASTRA PRANCIS . Seminar Nasional FIB UI
  13. Mariyam, S. (2021). MOTIF PENGGUNAAN FITUR EMOTICON DI MEDIA SOSIAL WHATSAPP: Studi terhadap Mahasiswa Program Studi Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam IAIN Madura. An-Nida : Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 13(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.34001/an-nida.v13i2.2373
  14. McCrindle. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Undestanding the global generations. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd
  15. Mulawarman, M., & Nurfitri, A. D. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan. Buletin Psikologi, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22759
  16. Nasution, F., Kholilah Siregar, Sopiyanto, & Lubis. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: Variasi Bahasa pada Remaja dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.33487/edupsycouns.v4i2.5074
  17. Setiawan, I. (2017). EKSNOMINASI POLITIK DALAM NARASI: KONSEPTUALISASI PEMIKIRAN MITOLOGIS ROLAND BARTHES DAN IMPLIKASI METODOLOGISNYA DALAM KAJIAN SASTRA. JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v3i1.430
  18. Sitanggang, A. O. (2020). The meaning of advertising “aqua life” in the semiotic perspective of Roland Barthes. International Journal of Multi Science, 1(1), 9–21
  19. Sui, Y., & Fan, M. (2015). Reinterpreting some key concepts in Barthes theory. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 7(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2014.0412
  20. Syakur, A. A. (2018). Text of cigarette advertisement: A semiology study of Roland Barthes. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(3), 72–79

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.