skip to main content

Assessment of the Perception of Security Based on CPTED in Bundaran HI TOD

*Siti Nurlaela orcid scopus  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Sugiono Sugiono  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Nadhila Alda Ismiralda  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Ardy Maulidy Navastara  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Ema Umilia  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Arwi Yudhi Koswara  -  Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
CPTED studies has been popular since 1960-1970s, however studies in Indonesian city context showed limited references. This paper identified the need of CPTED study followed a massive MRT network development in Jakarta City, as the need for re-design and city beautification to fit with the vibrant TOD urban lifestyle may create moments as well to promote CPTED implementation. The perception survey was developed to understand the perceived crime risk level among the MRT users of Bundaran HI Station. The survey conducted in two scopes of context, i.e. the TOD precinct, an area of 800 radius from the station, and inside the station itself. Finding from the TOD context showed that the maintenance and information have been the most significant but often mostly ignored. These two component may lead to under-rated other CPTED components, weaken the territorial reinforcement and natural surveillance. Out of 56 parameters, 26 parameters or almost halve have rated below 3, alarmed for a more comprehensive design and intervention at the TOD neighbourhood level that emphasizes on the implementation of CPTED principles. Finding from the Bundarin HI station context showed that under the Likert scale 1 (the lowest risk) to 5 (the highest risk), most of the CPTED rated from 4 – 5. There were a variation in the perceived security among different respondents based on gender, time pattern, location pattern, and mode chosen for station access. However, these rating differences were not significant according to the ANOVA and the t-test statistics. The chi-square test found no association between the perceived securities with the type of mode uses for station access. These preliminary findings suggested that the Bundaran HI TOD station is secured from crime risk according to perception of MRT users; therefore little variation in the rating of perceived security gave little information to draw any association with other important variables such as the mode choice for station access. However, taken the measures on wider context at the TOD precinct, the rating of CPTED consistently lower in all components, suggested the urban design and land use zoning-and transportation intervention that consider CPTED principles to be emphasizing at wider area to support the security of the station.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Transit Oriented Development (TOD), MRT, CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)
Funding: DRPM INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER

Article Metrics:

  1. APTA. (2010). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ( CPTED ) for Transit Facilities. Transportation
  2. Brookings, T., Policy, M., From, O., To, H., Belzer, E. D., Autler, G., Economics, S., Prepared, D. P., Great, T., Station, A., & June, F. (2002). T Ransit O Riented D Evelopment : Interfaces, June
  3. Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440
  4. Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. G. (1996). The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control. In Police Research Series No. 98
  5. Ferrell., C. E., Mathur., S., & Appleyard, B. S. (2015). Neighborhood Crime and Transit Station Access Mode Choice – Phase III of Neighborhood Crime and Travel Behavior. Mineta Transportation Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/29211
  6. Gupta, S. (2017). Integrated Land use and Urban Transport Planning :Principles and Practices. UNESCAP Capacity Building Workshop
  7. International Centre for the Prevention of Crime. (2012). The 2012 International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety
  8. JEFFERY, C. R. (1972). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Criminology, 10(2), 191–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1972.tb00553.x
  9. Leather, J., Fabian, H., Gota, S., & Mejia, A. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities State and Issues. Asian Development Bank Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, 17, 69
  10. Lee, J. S., Park, S., & Jung, S. (2016). Effect of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) measures on active living and fear of crime. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090872
  11. Pauls, T., Zywna, D., Prochilo, K., White, S., Christie, F., & Hainer, C. (2000). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design : General Guidelines for Designing Safer Communities. Prevention
  12. Queensland Government. (2007). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design guidelines for Queensland Part a: Essential features of safer places. In The State of Queensland. https://www.police.qld.gov.au/programs/cscp/safetyPublic/Documents/CPTEDPartA.pdf
  13. Sorensen, S. L., Hayes, J. G., & Atlas, R. I. (2013). Understanding CPTED and situational crime prevention. 21st Century Security and CPTED: Designing for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Crime Prevention, Second Edition, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15046
  14. Steventon, G. (2012). Crime prevention through environmental design. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00559-2
  15. The international center for the prevention of crime. (2014). Preventing crime on urban public transport. 5th International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Cities and the New Urban Agenda, 100–125
  16. 雨宮護, & 樋野公宏. (2005). 英国の防犯まちづくりのガイドライン“Safer Places.” Shin Toshi, 59–12

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

slot gacor slot