Assessment of the Perception of Security Based on CPTED in Bundaran HI TOD

Siti Nurlaela; Sugiono Sugiono; Nadhila Alda Ismiralda; Ardy Maulidy Navastara; Ema Umilia; Arwi Yudhi Koswara

doi:10.14710/tataloka.23.4.536-552

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.4.536-552

Assessment of the Perception of Security Based on CPTED in Bundaran HI TOD

*Siti Nurlaela

- Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Sugiono Sugiono - Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Nadhila Alda Ismiralda - Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Ardy Maulidy Navastara - Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Ema Umilia - Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

Arwi Yudhi Koswara - Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka9718,
    author = {Siti Nurlaela and Sugiono Sugiono and Nadhila Ismiralda and Ardy Navastara and Ema Umilia and Arwi Koswara},
    title = {Assessment of the Perception of Security Based on CPTED in Bundaran HI TOD},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {23},
    number = {4},
    year = {2021},
    keywords = {Transit Oriented Development (TOD), MRT, CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)},
    abstract = {CPTED studies has been popular since 1960-1970s, however studies in Indonesian city context showed limited references. This paper identified the need of CPTED study followed a massive MRT network development in Jakarta City, as the need for re-design and city beautification to fit with the vibrant TOD urban lifestyle may create moments as well to promote CPTED implementation. The perception survey was developed to understand the perceived crime risk level among the MRT users of Bundaran HI Station. The survey conducted in two scopes of context, i.e. the TOD precinct, an area of 800 radius from the station, and inside the station itself. Finding from the TOD context showed that the maintenance and information have been the most significant but often mostly ignored. These two component may lead to under-rated other CPTED components, weaken the territorial reinforcement and natural surveillance. Out of 56 parameters, 26 parameters or almost halve have rated below 3, alarmed for a more comprehensive design and intervention at the TOD neighbourhood level that emphasizes on the implementation of CPTED principles. Finding from the Bundarin HI station context showed that under the Likert scale 1 (the lowest risk) to 5 (the highest risk), most of the CPTED rated from 4 – 5. There were a variation in the perceived security among different respondents based on gender, time pattern, location pattern, and mode chosen for station access. However, these rating differences were not significant according to the ANOVA and the t-test statistics. The chi-square test found no association between the perceived securities with the type of mode uses for station access. These preliminary findings suggested that the Bundaran HI TOD station is secured from crime risk according to perception of MRT users; therefore little variation in the rating of perceived security gave little information to draw any association with other important variables such as the mode choice for station access. However, taken the measures on wider context at the TOD precinct, the rating of CPTED consistently lower in all components, suggested the urban design and land use zoning-and transportation intervention that consider CPTED principles to be emphasizing at wider area to support the security of the station.},
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {536--552}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.23.4.536-552},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/9718}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

CPTED studies has been popular since 1960-1970s, however studies in Indonesian city context showed limited references. This paper identified the need of CPTED study followed a massive MRT network development in Jakarta City, as the need for re-design and city beautification to fit with the vibrant TOD urban lifestyle may create moments as well to promote CPTED implementation. The perception survey was developed to understand the perceived crime risk level among the MRT users of Bundaran HI Station. The survey conducted in two scopes of context, i.e. the TOD precinct, an area of 800 radius from the station, and inside the station itself. Finding from the TOD context showed that the maintenance and information have been the most significant but often mostly ignored. These two component may lead to under-rated other CPTED components, weaken the territorial reinforcement and natural surveillance. Out of 56 parameters, 26 parameters or almost halve have rated below 3, alarmed for a more comprehensive design and intervention at the TOD neighbourhood level that emphasizes on the implementation of CPTED principles. Finding from the Bundarin HI station context showed that under the Likert scale 1 (the lowest risk) to 5 (the highest risk), most of the CPTED rated from 4 – 5. There were a variation in the perceived security among different respondents based on gender, time pattern, location pattern, and mode chosen for station access. However, these rating differences were not significant according to the ANOVA and the t-test statistics. The chi-square test found no association between the perceived securities with the type of mode uses for station access. These preliminary findings suggested that the Bundaran HI TOD station is secured from crime risk according to perception of MRT users; therefore little variation in the rating of perceived security gave little information to draw any association with other important variables such as the mode choice for station access. However, taken the measures on wider context at the TOD precinct, the rating of CPTED consistently lower in all components, suggested the urban design and land use zoning-and transportation intervention that consider CPTED principles to be emphasizing at wider area to support the security of the station.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Transit Oriented Development (TOD), MRT, CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)

Funding: DRPM INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 23, No 4 (2021): Volume 23 No. 4, November 2021

Recent articles

Penentuan Faktor Kunci Untuk Pengembangan Pengelolaan TPST-Bantargebang Berkelanjutan: Pendekatan MICMAC Analisis Kinerja Dana Alokasi Khusus Bidang Energi Skala Kecil dalam Meningkatkan Desa Berlistrik Faktor Fisik dan Non Fisik yang Memengaruhi Aksesibilitas secara Perseptual dan Aktual terhadap Taman Monas, Jakarta Pemetaan Jalur Jalan Wisata Bukit Jamur di Kabupaten Bengkayang Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) Kajian Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Kawasan Perumahan Nasional di Kecamatan Medan Helvetia Kemiskinan Multi Dimensi dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Indonesia More recent articles

APTA. (2010). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ( CPTED ) for Transit Facilities. Transportation
Brookings, T., Policy, M., From, O., To, H., Belzer, E. D., Autler, G., Economics, S., Prepared, D. P., Great, T., Station, A., & June, F. (2002). T Ransit O Riented D Evelopment : Interfaces, June
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440
Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. G. (1996). The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control. In Police Research Series No. 98
Ferrell., C. E., Mathur., S., & Appleyard, B. S. (2015). Neighborhood Crime and Transit Station Access Mode Choice – Phase III of Neighborhood Crime and Travel Behavior. Mineta Transportation Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/29211
Gupta, S. (2017). Integrated Land use and Urban Transport Planning :Principles and Practices. UNESCAP Capacity Building Workshop
International Centre for the Prevention of Crime. (2012). The 2012 International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety
JEFFERY, C. R. (1972). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Criminology, 10(2), 191–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1972.tb00553.x
Leather, J., Fabian, H., Gota, S., & Mejia, A. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities State and Issues. Asian Development Bank Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, 17, 69
Lee, J. S., Park, S., & Jung, S. (2016). Effect of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) measures on active living and fear of crime. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090872
Pauls, T., Zywna, D., Prochilo, K., White, S., Christie, F., & Hainer, C. (2000). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design : General Guidelines for Designing Safer Communities. Prevention
Queensland Government. (2007). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design guidelines for Queensland Part a: Essential features of safer places. In The State of Queensland. https://www.police.qld.gov.au/programs/cscp/safetyPublic/Documents/CPTEDPartA.pdf
Sorensen, S. L., Hayes, J. G., & Atlas, R. I. (2013). Understanding CPTED and situational crime prevention. 21st Century Security and CPTED: Designing for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Crime Prevention, Second Edition, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15046
Steventon, G. (2012). Crime prevention through environmental design. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00559-2
The international center for the prevention of crime. (2014). Preventing crime on urban public transport. 5th International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Cities and the New Urban Agenda, 100–125
雨宮護, & 樋野公宏. (2005). 英国の防犯まちづくりのガイドライン“Safer Places.” Shin Toshi, 59–12

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Tataloka . Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.