DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.4.524-535

Penentuan Faktor Kunci Untuk Pengembangan Pengelolaan TPST-Bantargebang Berkelanjutan: Pendekatan MICMAC

*Tatan Sukwika orcid scopus publons  -  Program Studi Teknik Lingkungan|Universitas Sahid Jakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The development of the area in the TPST-Bantargebang moved by conditions of decreasing capacity in the zone. The resulting negative externalities have had an impact on social and environmental conflicts for the surrounding community. The success of developing an area is determined by the existence and effectiveness of the roles of each stakeholder involved. Therefore, this study is important to do, especially for the development of sustainable management of TPST-Bantargebang. The objective of this research focused on finding the key factors driving the development of TPST-Bantargebang management. The method used is the MICMAC analysis approach. Retrieval of data through interviews key informants (experts) that determined based on the results of the snowball method. The results of the analysis show that there are important key factors, namely the development of human resource capacity and environmental carrying capacity. It recommended that the management of the TPST-Bantargebang establish a development scenario for the development of the TPST-Bantargebang based on these two key factors are in the social and environmental dimensions.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: key factor; MICMAC; integrated waste management; TPST-Bantargebang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Pada Pesisir Rawan Tsunami (Studi Pesisir Aceh, Banten dan Palu) Perencanaan Dark Heritage Bagi Masyarakat di Kawasan Pascabencana Tsunami Banda Aceh, Indonesia Faktor Fisik dan Non Fisik yang Memengaruhi Aksesibilitas secara Perseptual dan Aktual terhadap Taman Monas, Jakarta Kajian Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Kawasan Perumahan Nasional di Kecamatan Medan Helvetia Pemetaan Jalur Jalan Wisata Bukit Jamur di Kabupaten Bengkayang Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) Kemiskinan Multi Dimensi dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Indonesia More recent articles
  1. Ahmed, M. T., Saleh, M., Abdelkadir, A. F., & Abdelrahim, A. (2009). El Maghara scenario a search for sustainability and equity: An Egyptian case study. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 55–90
  2. Aprilia, A. (2016). Household solid waste management in Jakarta, Indonesia: Evaluation on human behaviour, economy, and GHG emissions. (PhD Thesis), Kyoto University, Japan
  3. Ariyani, N., Prasetya, T., & Gilang, K. (2018). Prospective structural method application to identify strategic variable of developing ecotourism region in reservoir area. Paper presented at the AFBE International Conference 6-7 December 2018, Jakarta Indonesia
  4. Aryeti. (2011). Peningkatan peranserta masyarakat melalui gerakan menabung pada bank sampah di kelurahan Babakan Surabaya, Bandung. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(1), 40-46. doi: 10.31815/jp.2011.6.40-46
  5. Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharm, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3-8
  6. Ejdys, J., Matuszak-Flejszman, A., Szymanski, M., Ustinovichius, L., Shevchenko, G., & Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2016). Crucial factors for improving the ISO 14001 environmental management system. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 52-73. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2015.1065905
  7. Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight: For corporate and regional development. Paris: Dunod
  8. Joshi, R., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: A review. Cogent Environmental Science, 2(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/23311843.2016.1139434
  9. Khan, U., & Haleem, A. (2012). Smart organisations: Modelling of enablers using an integrated ISM and Fuzzy-MICMAC approach. Int. J. Intelligent Enterprise, 1(3/4), 248–269
  10. Manurung, D., Bintoro, H. M. H., Hadi, S., & Lubis, I. (2016). Analysis of related area preference with regional sanitary landfill in temporary Bantargebang sanitary landfill using topsis method. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 17(2), 73-81. doi: 10.29122/jtl.v17i2.27
  11. Mayangkara, A. P. (2016). Evaluasi kebijakan pengelolaan sampah TPA gunung panggung kabupaten Tuban. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 427-444
  12. Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Nazarko, Ł., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A. (2017). Structural analysis as an instrument for identification of critical drivers of technology development. Procedia Engineering, 182, 474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137
  13. Noviana, L., & Sukwika, T. (2020). Pemanfaatan sampah organik sebagai pupuk kompos ramah lingkungan di kelurahan Bhaktijaya Depok. Pengabdian Untukmu Negeri, 4(2), 237-241. doi: 10.37859/jpumri.v4i2.2155
  14. Omran, A., Khorish, M., & Saleh, M. (2014). Structural Analysis with Knowledge-based MICMAC Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications, 86(5), 39-43. doi: 10.5120/14985-3290
  15. Paramita, D., Murtilaksono, K., & Manuwoto. (2018). Kajian pengelolaan sampah berdasarkan daya dukung dan kapasitas tampung prasarana persampahan kota Depok. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 2(2), 104-117. doi: 10.29244/jp2wd.2018.2.2.104-117
  16. Sudirman. (2012). Implementasi 3R melalui bank sampah. Jakarta: Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup
  17. Sujiyanto. (2016). Analisis pengelolaan sampah di bank sampah malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 5(3), 115-122
  18. Sukwika, T. (2018). Peran pembangunan infrastruktur terhadap ketimpangan ekonomi antarwilayah di Indonesia. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 115-130. doi: 10.14710/jwl.6.2.115-130
  19. Sukwika, T., & Noviana, L. (2020). Status keberlanjutan pengelolaan sampah terpadu di TPST-Bantargebang, Bekasi: Menggunakan rapfish dengan R statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 18(1), 107-118. doi: 10.14710/jil.18.1.107-118

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.