skip to main content

CSR, SUATU REFLEKSI PERENCANAAN TRANSAKTIF: PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT ILMU PENGETAHUAN

*Muhammad Taufiq  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Benedictus Kombaitan  -  Kelompok Keahlian Pengelolaan Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Heru Purboyo Hidayat Putro  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study aims to provide an understanding of why CSR planning does not necessarily bring about community satisfaction even though it has been through participation in its planning, through a philosophical perspective of science. Using evaluative descriptive methods with secondary data sources such as literature and journals (current research), then represented through several focus discussions include: (1) Concept of planning and CSR through the perspective of science philosophy, (2) Ontological, epistemological and axiological aspects of complexity CSR, (3) Theoretical debates, empirical facts and discussions. Conceptual review through this literature review has found the complex connectivity between community and company implicated in understanding that CSR planning is not only participatory planning but also more to transactive planning. In here, CSR understanding tends to transactional, developing value in here is ”who will get something”, not only interpreted as community participation but tended to transactional.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: CSR; filsafat ilmu pengetahuan; perencanaan transaktif

Article Metrics:

  1. Abuya, W.O. 2016. Mining Conflicts and Corporate Social Responsibility: Titanium Mining in Kwale, Kenya. the Extractive Industries and Society. 3: 485–493
  2. Alfitri. 2011. Community Development: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta (ID): Pustaka Pelajar
  3. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, O.A.M. 2013. An Integrated Management Systems Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production. 56:7–17
  4. Banerjee, S.B. 2014. A Critical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards A Global Governance Framework. Critical Perspectives on International Business. 10:84–95
  5. Carroll, A.B., & Shabana, K.M. 2010. the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 85–105
  6. Dahlsrud, A. 2008. How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defied: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 15:1–13
  7. Davidoff, P. & Reiner, T.A. 1962. A Choice theory of Planning. Journal of American Institute of Planners. 28(2):103-115
  8. Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 31(4):331-338
  9. Djalali, M.A. 2015. Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Pengantar
  10. Djunaedi, A. 2015. Pengantar Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta (ID): Gadjah Mada University Press
  11. Dobers, P. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility: Management And Methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 16:185–191
  12. Fischler, R. 2000. Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 19:358-368
  13. Fainstein, S.S., & Fainstein, N.I. 1971. City Planning and Political Values. Urban Affairs Review. 6(3):341-362
  14. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., & Wick, A.C. 2007. Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputaion, and Success. New Heaven (US): Yale University Press
  15. Friedmann, J. 1973. Retracking America: A theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, New York (US): Anchor
  16. Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledgeto Action. Princeton, New Jersey (US): Princeton University Press
  17. Friedmann, J. 2003. Why Do Planning Theory. Planning Theory. 2:7-10
  18. Grolin, J. 1998. Corporate Legitimacy in Risk Society: the Case of Brent Spar. Business Strategy and the Environment. 7:213–222
  19. Haikola, S., & Anshelm, J. (2016): Mineral Policy at A Crossroads? Critical Reflections on the Challenges with Expanding Sweden’s Mining Sector. the Extractive Industries and Society. 3:508-516
  20. Hamann, R. 2003. Mining Companies' Role in Sustainable Development: the ‘Why' and ‘How' of Corporate Social Responsibility from A Business Perspective. Development Southern Africa. 20:237–254
  21. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London (GB): Macmillan
  22. Hedin, L. T., & Ranängen, H. 2017. Community Involvement and Development in Swedish Mining. the Extractive Industries and Society
  23. Huxley, M. 2000. The Limits to Communicative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 19:369-377
  24. Ife, J. 2013. Community Development in An Uncertain World: Vision, Analysis and Practice. New York (US): Cambridge University Press
  25. Innes, J.E., & Booher, D.E. 2014. A Turning Point for Planning Theory? Overcoming Dividing Discourses. Planning Theory. 1-19
  26. Iskandar, J. 2005. Teori dan Isu Pembangunan. Garut (ID): Pustaka Program Pascasarjana Universitas Garut
  27. ISO. 2009. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 26000: Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva (CH):ISO
  28. Johansen, P.H., & Chandle, T.L. 2015. Mechanisms of Power in Participatory Rural Planning. Journal of Rural Studies. 40:12-20
  29. Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Industry: Exploring Trends in Social and Environmental Disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14:271–284
  30. Kapelus, P. 2002. Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Community: the Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics. 39:275–296
  31. Kattsoff, L.O. 1996. Elements of Philosophy (Pengantar Filsafat), Alih bahasa, Sumargono. Yogyakarta (ID): Pustaka Tiara Wacana
  32. Kelly, E.D. 2010. Community Planning: An Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan. Washington DC (US). Island Press
  33. Kemp, D. 2010. Community Relations in the Global Mining Industry: Exploring the Internal Dimensions of Externally Orientated Work. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 17:1–14
  34. Kirsch, S. 2014. Mining Capitalism: the Relationship Between Corporations and Their Critics. California (US): University of California Press
  35. Leimona, B., & Fauzi, A. (2008). CSR dan Pelestarian Lingkungan Mengelola Dampak: Positif dan Negatif. Jakarta (ID): IBL
  36. Litmanen, T., Jartti, T., & Rantala, E. 2016. Refining the Preconditions of A Social Licence to Operate (SLO): Reflections on Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Mining in Two Finnish Regions. the Extractive Industries and Society. 3:782–792
  37. Margerum, R.D. 2002. Collaborative Planning: Building Consensus and Building a Distinct Model for Practice. 21:237-253
  38. Muhadjir, N. 2001. Filsafat Ilmu: Positivisme, Postpositivisme, dan Postmodernisme. Yogyakarta (ID): Sarasin
  39. Mulyadi. 2003. Pengelolan Program Corporate Social Responsibility: Pendekatan, Keberpihakan dan Keberlanjutannya. Center for Populaton Studies. UGM. Yogyakarta (ID): Rake Sarasin
  40. Nygaard, V. 2015. Do Indigenous Interests Have A Say in Planning of New Mining Projects? Experiences from Finnmark, Norway. the Extractive Industries and Society. 3:17–24
  41. Phillips, R., & Pitman R. 2009. An Introduction to Community Development. Routledge
  42. Ranängen, H., & Lindman, Å. 2017. A Path Towards Sustainability for the Nordic Mining Industry. Journal of Clean Production. 151:43–52
  43. Ranängen, H., & Zobel, T. 2014. Revisiting the ‘How’ of Corporate Social Responsibility in Extractive Industries and Forestry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 84:299–312
  44. Ranängen, H. 2015. Stakeholder Management in Reality: Moving from Conceptual Frameworks to Operational Strategies and Interactions. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 3:21–33
  45. Ranängen, H. 2017. Stakeholder Management Theory Meets CSR Practice in Swedish Mining. Miner Econ. 30: 15–29
  46. Reichert, A. K., Webb, M. S., & Thomas, E. G. 2000. Corporate Support for Ethical and Environmental Policies: A Financial Management Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 25:53– 64
  47. Shalaby, N.W. 2013., Multi Agent Modeling for The Participatory Planning Process. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. 2013. 105:852-865
  48. Suharto, E. 2005. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Masyarakat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial & Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung (ID): Refika Aditama
  49. Suriasumantri, J.S. 1970. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta (ID): Sinar Harapan
  50. Sutarso. 1985. Praktek Pekerjaan Sosial dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat. Bandung (ID): STKS
  51. Theresia, A., Andini, K.S., Nugraha, P.G.P. & Mardikanto, T. 2015. Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat. Bandung (ID): Penerbit Alfabeta
  52. Unesco. 1956. the Definition of Community Development. Unesco Working Paper for Acc Working Group on Community Development
  53. United Nation. 2017. the Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017
  54. Yakoleva, N. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Industries. Cornwall (GB): Ashgate Publishing Limited
  55. Wahana, P. 2016. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta (ID): Pustaka Diamond
  56. Wibisono, Y. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Gresik (ID): Fascho Publishing
  57. Zubaedi. 2013. Pengembangan Masyaraakt: Wacana dan Praktik. Jakarta (ID): Fajar Interpratama Mandiri

Last update: 2021-07-27 21:05:39

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-07-27 21:05:39

No citation recorded.