*Nur Miladan  -  Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Kusumaningdyah Nurul Handayani  -  Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Dewa Putu Aris Sadana  -  Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Received: 21 Oct 2017; Published: 31 May 2018.
Open Access
Citation Format:

Flooding is the most dominant disaster in the world and it takes place until recently. So far, the urban flood reduction is carried out through the structural and non structural mitigation approaches. The spatial mitigation approach is very needed to be considered in the flood risk management besides those approaches. The spatial transformation (land use pattern), and environmental carrying capacity can be used to realize the spatial approach in disaster risk management. This research aims to analyze the flood risk area typology in Kali Pepe River Basin, Surakarta City. It uses deductive approach with quantitative methods being supported by spatial analysis. The results indicate there are 42 spatial types, but only 18 types being the flood risk areas. Land caracteristic tends to be not correlated to the flood impact intensity. Land use pattern and drainage caracteristics have a tendency to be correlated to the flood impact risk. The spatial planning could be focused on urban settlements, especially in areas with high building densities. The built-up space restrictions should be implemented in the river sourrounding areas, and the infrastructure engineering concern with the river upstream-downstream system.

Keywords: area typology; river basin; flood risk

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, “Sebaran Kejadian Bencana Per Kabupaten/ Kota 1815 s/d 2017”, Data dan Informasi Bencana Indonesia [Web], diakses 15 Februari 2017, http://dibi.bnpb.go.id/DesInventar/dashboard.jsp?countrycode=id&continue=y〈= ID
  2. Brody, S.D., Highfield, W.E., 2013, “Open space protection and flood mitigation: A national study”, Land Use Policy Vol. 32, pp. 89–95.
  3. Gilbuena Jr., R, Kawamura, A., Medina, R., Nakagawa, N., Amaguchi, H., 2013, “Environmental impact assessment using a utility-based recursive evidential reasoning approach for structural flood mitigation measures in Metro Manila, Philippines”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 131, pp. 92-102.
  4. Hong, Y, Adhikari, P., Gourley, J.J., 2013, “Flood Hazard and Disaster”, in: Bobrowsky, P.T., Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
  5. Indarto, 2016, Hidrologi: Analisis dan Tool Untuk Interpretasi Hidograf Alitan Sungai, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara Group.
  6. Kousky, C & Walls, M., 2014, “Analysis Floodplain conservation as a flood mitigation strategy: Examining costs and benefits”, Ecological Economics Vol. 104, pp. 119–128.
  7. Liao, K., Le, T.A., Nguyen, K.V., 2016, “Urban design principles for flood resilience: Learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 155, pp. 69–78.
  8. Miladan, N., 2016, “Communities’ Contributions to Urban Resilience Process: a Case Study of Semarang City (Indonesia) Toward Coastal Hydrological Risk”, PhD Disertation in Spatial Planning and Urbanism, Université Paris-Est and Universitas Diponegoro .
  9. Mohit, M.A., Sellub, G.M., 2013, “Mitigation of Climate Change Effects through Non-structural Flood Disaster Management in Pekan Town, Malaysia”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 85, pp. 564 – 573.
  10. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta, 2016, “BPBD Kota Surakarta Waspadai 21 Kelurahan Rawan Banjir”, Berita Kota [Web], diakses 15 Februari 2017, http://www.surakarta.go.id/konten/bpbd-kota-surakarta-waspadai-21-kelurahan-rawan-banjir
  11. Prahasta, Eddy, 2015, SIG Tutorial ArcGIS untuk Bidang Geodesi & Geomatika, Bandung: Informatika.
  12. Ran, J., Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2016, “Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 57, pp. 68–79.
  13. Soemarwoto, Otto, 2000, Analisa Dampak Lingkungan, Yogyakarta: Gadjahmada University Press.
  14. Sugiono, 2011, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, Bandung: CV. Afabeta.
  15. Tingsanchali, T., 2011, “Urban Flood Disaster Management”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 25-37.
  16. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2012, “Annual Report 2011”, UNISDR [Web], diakses 15 Februari 2017, http://www.unisdr.org/files/27627_ar2011v2.pdf
  17. United Nation Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Structural and non-structural measures”, Terminology [Web], diakses 15 Februari 2017, http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/terminology/v.php?id=505
  18. Undang-undang No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.
  19. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P. Cannon, T, Davis, I., 2003, At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, London/ New York: Routledge.