skip to main content

PARAMETER PENENTU PENGGUNAAN TRANSPORTASI UMUM DI PERKOTAAN PATI

*Bekti Winarno  -  Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Pati, Indonesia
Okto Risdianto Manullang  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The research aims to analyze and assess determining parameters for public transportation usage for choice user group among the labours that work in Pati Urban Area; therefor the most dominant parameters will be known. User satisfaction recently used in public transportation researches and widely believed as determinant of mode choice. This research is using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Analysis with 150 sampels of Pati Urban Area labours (including public servant and private workers) choosen by purposive sampling technique. The findings of the reasearh are : connectivity, accessibility and service quality have positive and significant impact toward user disatisfaction and user disatisfaction influences traveller behaviour to unuse public transportation services, while influence of travel cost couldn’t be explained and estimated. Finally, answering the research question, research reveals that connectivity’s parameters (0,563 influence rate), i.e waiting time, desireable arrival schedule and travel time, are the most dominant to determine public transportation usage with accessibility’s parameters (0,462) at the next ranking. At the lower rangking but also significant are service quality’s parameters with 0,451 influence rate.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: accessibility; connectivity; service quality; public transportation

Article Metrics:

  1. Abenoza, Roberto F., Oded Cats dan Yusak O. Susilo. 2017. Travel satisfaction with public transport : Determinants, user classes, regional disparities and their evolution. Transportation Research Part A 95 (2017) pp. 64–84
  2. Alvi, Mohsin. 2016. A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research. MPRA Paper No. 70218
  3. Beimborn, Edward A., Michael J. Greenwald, Xia Jin. 2003. Transit accessibility and connectivity impacts on transit choice and captivity. Center for Urban Transportation Studies and Department of Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  4. Chowdhury, Subeh, Avishai Ceder dan Bruno Velty. 2014. Measuring public-transport network connectivity using Google Transit with comparison across cities. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 4
  5. Chuen, Onn Chiu, Mohamed Rehan Karim dan Sumiani Yusoff. 2014. Mode choice between private and public transport in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2014, Article ID 394587
  6. Corpuz, Grace. 2007. Public transport or private vehicle factors that impact on mode choice. 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, January 2007
  7. De Vos, Jonas, Patricia L. Mokhtarian Veronique Van Acker dan Frank Witlox. 2016. Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction. Transportation Vol. 43, pp. 771–796
  8. Gebeyehu, Mintesnot dan Shin-ei Takano. 2008. Modeling the relationship between travelers’ level of satisfaction and their mode choice behavior. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2008), pp. 103-118
  9. Hair Jr., Joseph F., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin dan Rolph E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall
  10. Iacobucci, Dawn. 2009. Structural equations modeling : Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (2010) pp.90–98
  11. Jenatabadi, Hashem Salarzadeh. n/a. A Critical Story about Sample Size, Outliers, and Normality Criteria in Structural Equation Modelling. Department of Science and Technology Studies University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  12. Lierop, Dea van dan Ahmed El-Geneidy. 2016. Enjoying loyalty : The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Research in Transportation Economics 59 pp. 50-59
  13. Papaioannou, Dimitrios dan Luis Miguel Martinez. 2015. The role of accessibility and connectivity in mode choice. Transportation Research Procedia 10 p. 831 – 839
  14. Schreiber, James B., Frances K. Stage, Jamie King, Amaury Nora, Elizabeth A. Barlow. 2006. Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results. Heldref Publications
  15. Shiftan, Yoram, Yotam Barlach dan Daniel Shefer. 2015. Measuring passenger loyalty to public transport modes. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 18, No. 1
  16. Suhari. 2008. Pengaruh penerapan Pertamina Way terhadap kualitas pelayanan dalam rangka meningkatkan loyalitas. Tesis, Prodi Magister Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro
  17. Tamin, Ofyar Z. 2000. Perencanaan dan pemodelan transportasi. Penerbit ITB, Bandung
  18. Wang, Dong dan Yan Liu. 2015. Factors influencing public transport use : A study of university commuters’ travel and mode choice behaviours. State of Australian Cities Conference 2015
  19. Wibisono, Dermawan. 2013. Panduan Penyusunan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi. Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta
  20. _____. 2014. Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Kawasan Perkotaan Pati. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Pati
  21. _____. 2015. Rencana Umum Jaringan Transportasi Jalan Kabupaten Pati. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Pati

Last update: 2021-07-25 21:07:33

  1. Public perception of the transit bus plan in the city of Lhokseumawe

    H Haryadi, Y Darma, M Isya. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/933/1/012043

Last update: 2021-07-25 21:07:33

No citation recorded.