skip to main content


*Eka Purna Yudha  -  Program Studi Ilmu Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perdesaan, Pascasarjana IPB, Indonesia
Bambang Juanda  -  Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fak. Ekonomi dan Manajemen, IPB, Indonesia
Lala M Kolopaking  -  Departemen Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, Fak. Ekologi Manusia, IPB, Indonesia
Rilus A Kinseng  -  Departemen Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, Fak. Ekologi Manusia, IPB, Indonesia

Citation Format:
In 2014, the Government enacted Law No. 6/2014 on Villages with a view to reconstructing village financial and asset management arrangements to accelerate the inclusive and sustainable development of rural areas. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of village financial management on the performance of rural development. The study was conducted on 326 Villages in Pandeglang District. The analytical tool of the study using Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) modeling will look at how the village expenditure is included in the Village Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBDes). Expenditure of development (infrastructure) of the village has the greatest impact on the performance of village development with the value of elasticity of 0.637. The influence of village expenditure on the GWR model is strongly influenced by the geographical, demographic, and socio-economic conditions of rural communities, resulting in varying outcomes in each village.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: APBDes; Performance; Rural Development
Funding: exelent scholarship for prospective lecturer progrrame from Ministry of Technology Research and Higher Education

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmed R, Hossein M. 1990. Development Impact of Rural Structure in Bangladesh. Research Report 83. International Food Policy Research Inst itute in colaboration with Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
  2. Ashok KR, Balasubramanian. 2006. Role of Infrastructure in Productivity and Diversification of Agriculture. South Asia Network of Economic Research Institutes (SANEI) Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan
  3. Aschauer DA. 1989. Public investment and productivity growth in the group of seven. Economic Perspectives. 13(5):17-25
  4. Ayoola GB. (2001), Essays on The Agricultural Economy 1: A Book of Readings on Agricultural Development Policy and Administration in Nigeria: Ibadan: TMA Publishers. Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), (2004) The Ethics of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification
  5. Beckley T, Nadeau S, Wall E, Martz D. 2002. Multiple Capacities, Multiple Outcomes: Delving Deeper Into the Meaning of Community Capacity. Submitted to the Journal of Rural Studies
  6. Bjornestad L. 2009. Fiscal Decentralization, Fiscal Incentives, and Pro-Poor Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 168, Asian Development Bank. Metro Manila
  7. Creightney C. 1993. Transport and economic performance: a survey of developing countries, Report, World Bank
  8. Ekong EE. 2003. Introduction to Rural Sociology: An Introduction and Analysis of Rural Nigeria, Uyo, Nigeria: Dave Educational Publishers
  9. Fan, Kang C. 2004. Is Small Beautiful ? Farm Size, Productivity, and Poverty in Asian Agriculture. Agric Econ 32: 135-146
  10. Fischer M, Scolten HJ, David. 1996. Spatial Analysis Perpectives on GIS. GISDATA 4. London: Taylor & Francis
  11. Flora J. 2001. Community, Organization and Government: Community Capacity and the New Rural Economy. Paper presented at the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation Conference. October, 2001. Muenster, Saskatchewan
  12. Fotheringham AS. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. US. John Wiley & Sones
  13. Frank F, Smith A. 1999. The Community Development Handbook: A Tool to Build Community capacity. Canada: Human Resources Development Canada
  14. Gieske H, van Buuren A, Bekkers V. 2016. Conceptualizing Public Innovative Capacity: A Framework for Assessment. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(1): 1–27
  15. Howe J, Mc Mahon E, Propst L. 1997. Balancing Nature and Commerce in Gateaway Communities. Island Press:Waashington D.C-Covelo California
  16. Jean S. 2006. Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4), 1121-1140
  17. Juanda B, Wibowo K, Millich L. 2013. Studi Efektivitas dan Dampak Kursus Keuangan Daerah (KKD) dan Kursus Keuangan Daerah Khusus (KKDK).Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan Republik Indonesia
  18. Kogoya T, Olfie B, Laoh OE. 2015. Partisipasi Masyarakat terhadap Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan Desa di Kabupaten Lanny Jaya-Papua. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi. 15 (2):1-14
  19. Kretzmann, John P, McKnight JL. 1993. Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications
  20. Kwon E. 2001. Infrastructure, growth, and poverty reduction in Indonesia: A cross-sectional analysis. Mimei. Manila: Asian Development Bank
  21. Lall S, Shalizi Z, Deichmann U. 2001. Agglomeration Economies And Productivity In Indian Industry. The World Bank, Washington DC, 20433
  22. Lestari ER. 2015. Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Desa di Desa Pilanjau Kecamatan Sambaliung Kabupaten Berau
  23. Malmberg S, Hawton K, Simkin S. 1997. A Study of suicide in farmer in England and Wales. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43 (1), 107-111.eJournal Administrasi Negara. 3 (2): 466-479
  24. Mischen PA, Sinclair TAP. 2017. Small is Beautiful: Knowledge Management and Budget Reform in a Rural County. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 22(1), 2017, article 2
  25. Moore J. 2005. Policy, priorities and action: A case study of the University of British Columbia’s engagement with sustainability. Higher Education Policy. Vol. 18: 179-197
  26. Narayan D. 2002. Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook. Washington, DC: The World Bank
  27. Oates WE. 1999. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 27(5): 1120-1149
  28. Pade SP. 2015. Pentingnya Kualitas Aparat Pemerintah Desa dalam Pembangunan di Desa Lantung Kecamatan Wori Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Politico. 2(6):1-12
  29. Parvayi S. 2011. Possible consequences of targeted subsidies plan, development strategy Journal, 27, 173-192
  30. Pranoto S. 2005. Pembangunan Perdesaan Berkelanjutan Melalui Model Pengembangan Agropolitan. Tesis Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB. Bogor
  31. Pribadi DO. 2005. Pembangunan Kawasan Agropolitan Melalui Pengembangan Kota-Kota Kecil Menengah, Peningkatan Efisiensi Pasar Perdesaan dan Penguatan Akses Masyarakat terhadap Lahan. Tesis Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB. Bogor
  32. Rahimi FAF. 2015. Towards community empowerment for poverty reduction in rural Afghanistan. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies. Volume 34, 34-42
  33. Ranjbar H, Fotros MH, Kabiryan M. 2014. the effect of targeted subsidies on consumer welfare equivalent change in Iran, Iranian Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9, 133-149
  34. Reimer B. 2006. The rural context of community development in Canada. Journal of Rural and Community Development. Volume 1, 155-175
  35. Rietveld R, Nijkamp R. 1992. Transport and Regional Development. Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie. Research-Memorandum 1992-50 December 1992
  36. Shahmoradi A, Haghihi I, Zahedi R.. 2011. the effects of energy prices and cash subsidy in Iran, Research and Economic Policy Journal, 57, 5-30
  37. Strzelecka M. 2015. The prospects for empowerment through local governance for tourism—the LEADER approach. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 10(3), 78-97
  38. Valentin EK. 2001. SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 9(2): 54-68
  39. Vennesland B. 2003. Rural economic development and its influence on forest policy in Norway. In: Solberg, B. (Ed.), Scandinavian Forest Economics No. 37, pp. 290– 297
  40. Warsono H, Ruksamin. 2014. The Obstacles of Implementation of Village Allocation Fund Program in the North Konawe Southeast Sulawesi. Journal of Management and Sustainability; Vol. 4, No. 3; 2014

Last update: 2021-07-25 08:05:56

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-07-25 08:05:56

  1. Rural development policy and strategy in the rural autonomy era. Case study of pandeglang regency-indonesia

    Yudha E.P.. Human Geographies, 14 (1), 2020. doi: 10.5719/hgeo.2020.141.8