DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.1.12-22

ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG EKOLOGI UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT DI BAGIAN UTARA TELUK BONE

*Taslim Arifin  -  Pusat Riset Kelautan, Indonesia
Waluyo Waluyo  -  Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan, Karawang – BRSDM-KP KKP, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Abstract : Waters carrying capacity in seaweed (Eucheuma cottonii) cultures should be a concern for optimum seaweed culture. Carrying capacity can determine by ecological footprint (EF) analysis, which in this research use production footprint. This research on Mei 2015 (1sttransitionalseason) and September 2015 (2ndtransitionalseason) in Luwu and Palopo, South Sulawesi. Map and land use analyzed with  GIS (Geographic Information Systems).The results showed that theecological footprint production (EFP)in Luwu waters is 67.88 ton/capita/year, or equivalent to 235,823.93 tons/year.Based on the analysis of the availability of water for seaweed is 59,781.79 hectares, it can produce seaweed (biocapacity) for 1,437,779.60 tons/year and  the number of farmers that allows for use the waters is  21,432 capita. The ecological footprint  production (EFp) in Palopo waters is 3.08 ton/capita/year, or equivalent to 4,589.99 tons/year. Water availability analysis is 1,771.41 hectares are able to produce seaweed (biocapacity) for  18,287.46 ton/year and the number of farmers that allows for use the waters is 635 farmers capita. The results comparison between biocapacity and ecological footprint, ecological status for  Luwu and Palopo waters are still in sustainable use.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: seaweed cultivation; ecological footprint; biocapacity; waters carrying capacity
Funding: Pusat Riset Kelautan - Badan Riset & Sumberdaya Manusia Kelautan & Perikanan, KKP

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ENGLISH
Recent articles
PENGUKURAN PENGARUH BELANJA DESA TERHADAP KINERJA PEMBANGUNAN DESA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION BENTUK KELEMBAGAAN DAN POLA PEMBIAYAAN LAND BANKING PUBLIK DI INDONESIA LOW-TECH INNOVATION AND LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: CASE STUDY THE TRADITIONAL BATIK INDUSTRY IN PEKALONGAN MUNICIPALITY Front matter Back matter More recent articles
  1. Aslan LM. 1998. Budidaya Rumput Laut. Yokyakarta: Kanisius.11-19Hlm
  2. Bala, B.K. and Md.A.Hossain. 2009. Integrated management of coastal zone for food security. Final Report.Bangladesh.Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University. 19p
  3. Boyd CE dan Lichtkoppler F, 1982.Water quality management in pond fish culture.(4th Edition ed.).InternationalCenter for Aquaculture, Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn, USA
  4. [DKP] Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.2016. Laporan Temu Teknis Budidaya Rumput Laut, Makassar 2016
  5. [DKP] Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Luwu. 2015. Laporan tahunan perikanan Kabupaten Luwu Tahun 2010-2014. Belopa.DKP Kab.Luwu. 31Hlm
  6. [DKP] Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kota Palopo. 2015. Laporan tahunan DKP Kota Palopo Tahun 2010-2014. Palopo.DKP Kota Palopo. 42Hlm
  7. Ewing, B., A. Reed, A. Galli, J. Kitzes, and M. Wackernagel. 2010. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts. 2010 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network. 3p
  8. Harrison, P.J. and C.L. Hurd. 2001. Nutrient physiology of seaweeds: Application of concepts to aquaculture. J. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 42:71-82
  9. Hurd, C.L., P.J. Harrison, K. Bischof, and C.S. Lobban. 2014. Seaweed ecology and physiology. 2nded. Cambridge.Cambridge University Press.238 p, 349 p
  10. KenFURUYA. 2004. EnvironmentalCarrying Capacity Inan Aquaculture Groundof Seaweed sand ShellfishinSanriku Coast. Bull.Fish.Res.Agen.SupplementNo.1,65-69,2004
  11. [KLH] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 1988. Keputusan Menteri Negara Kependudukan dan Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 02 Tahun 1988 tentang Pedoman Penetapan Baku Mutu Lingkungan. Jakarta
  12. [KLH] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup R.I. 2004. Keputusan Menteri Negara Kependudukan dan Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 51 Tahun 2004 tentang Baku Mutu Air Laut. Jakarta
  13. Rees WE. 1996. Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. J Population and Environment, (17):195-215
  14. Schroll.H, J. Andersen and B. Kjærgård. 2012. Carrying Capacity: An Approach to Local Spatial Planning in Indonesia. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies vol. 11, no. 1, 2012
  15. Toda.S., O. Matsuda and M.Yamasaki. 2004. Ecosystem and Carrying Capacity of Aquaculture Ground -for sustainable development of aquaculture and stock enhancement. Seikai National Fisheries Research Institute, NAGASAKI 2-3 November 2004. Bull. Fish. Res. Agen. No. 19, 1-7, 2007
  16. Widigdo, B., J. Pariwono. 2003. Daya dukung perairandi pantaiutaraJawaBaratuntuk budidayaudang(Studi kasusdi KabupatenSubang,TelukJakarta dan Serang). Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Perairan dan Perikanan Indonesia, 1:10-17
  17. Yonvitner, S.B. Susilo, G. Rakasiwi, dan A.A. Taurusman. 2007. Daya dukung pulau-pulau kecil dengan pendekatan ekological footprint : Kasus di Pulau Wetar. Bogor.PKSPL IPB.12Hlm
  18. Y. N. Tian and H. Q. Wang. 2013. Progress of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, Vol. 1, No. 2, April 2013
  19. Zhu, C. and S. Dong. 2013. Aquaculture Site Selection and Carrying Capacity Management in the People’s Republic of China
  20. InL.G. Ross, T.C. Telfer, L. Falconer, D. Soto & J. Aguilar-Manjarrez, eds. Site selection and carrying capacities for inland and coastal aquaculture, pp. 219–230.FAO/Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Expert Workshop, 6–8 December 2010. Stirling, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 21. Rome, FAO. 282 pp

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.