DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.1.35-49

BENTUK KELEMBAGAAN DAN POLA PEMBIAYAAN LAND BANKING PUBLIK DI INDONESIA

*Azhari Pamungkas  -  Magister Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Institut Teknologi Bandung ; Staf Pemerintah Kota Metro, Provinsi Lampung, Indonesia
Haryo Winarso  -  Sekolah Arsitektur Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan ITB, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The application of land banking is likely to be conducted in Indonesia as well as its success in various countries in solving various land-related problems. This study aims to formulate an institutional set up and funding scheme for land banking in Indonesia. This study utilized an adoption of Delphi method to compile and interprete expert opinions, in addition extensive review of literature and legislations were also conducted. This study recommends the set up of public owned land banking company that consist of main company and subsidiary company. The main company is 100% owned by the government. The subsidiary company is jointly developed with private sector and community. The main company is assigned to bank land for public purposes (eg. infrastructures, public housing, facilities) and not for profit. The subsidiary company is assigned to bank land for development and giving opportunity the land owners to get share and profit. The set up land bank company is funded by local budget. Profit from the subsidiary company can be reinvented to the main company.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: land banking; institutional set up; funding; Indonesia
Funding: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
BENTUK KELEMBAGAAN DAN POLA PEMBIAYAAN LAND BANKING PUBLIK DI INDONESIA ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG EKOLOGI UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT DI BAGIAN UTARA TELUK BONE PENGUKURAN PENGARUH BELANJA DESA TERHADAP KINERJA PEMBANGUNAN DESA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION Front matter Back matter More recent articles
  1. Alexander, F. S. (2008). Land banking as Metropolitan Policy. Brookings: Blueprint for American Prosperity
  2. Alexander, F. S. (2011). Land Banks and Land banking. Michigan: Center for Community Progress
  3. Anton, T. J. (1975). Governing Greater Stockholm : A Study of Policy Development and System Change. Berkeley: University of California Press
  4. Armanda, A. (2013). Ekonomi Politik : Seyngketa Aset Antara Yayasan Kas Surabaya dengan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Politik Muda Vol 3, No. 3, Agustus-Desember , 396-411
  5. Atmert, T. (1987). Land banking in Stockholm. Habitat Intl. Vol 1 I. No 1 , 37-55
  6. Bao, H. (2008). Policies Supply and Institution Organization : Fieldwork on the Regulation Evolvement of Land Acquisition. Beijing: Economy and Management Press
  7. Brooks, K. W. (1979). Delphi Technique: Expanding Applications. North Central Association Quarterly, 54 (3) , 377-385
  8. Carr, J., & Smith, L. (1975). Public Land banking and the Price of Land. Journal Land Economics 51 , 4:316-30
  9. Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The mdified Delphi Technique: A Rotational modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education 15(2) , 1-10
  10. Cyphert, F. R., & Gant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi Technique A Case Study. Phi Delta Kappan 52 , 272-273
  11. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1962). An Experimental Application of The Delphi Method to The Use of Experts. California: The RAND Corporation
  12. (2014-2015). DDA Annual Report. Delhi: Delhi Development Authority
  13. DDA at a Glance. (2016). Dipetik September 10, 2016, dari Delhi Development Authority: http://dda.org.in/ddanew/dda_at_glance.aspx
  14. de Wit, J. (2006). Revitalizing Blighted Communities with Land Banks. Dipetik April 23, 2016, dari University of Michigan: http://www.umich.edu/~econdev/landbank/
  15. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning. Glenview Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co
  16. Delhi Development Act. (1957)
  17. Devoy, R. S., & Rodrungrung.(tanpa tahun), C. Basic Land banking concepts and their application to low cost housing in Thailand
  18. Dong, W. (2007). Problems and Solutions in the land Reserve System of Medium and Small Cities. Guang Dong Tu Di Ke Xue 6 (Chinese) , 8-12
  19. Evans, A. W. (2004). Economics, Real Estate & The Supply of Land. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
  20. Hamilton, S. W., & Baxter, D. E. (1977). Government Ownership and the Price of Land,. Dalam L. B. Smith, & M. Walker, Public Property? The Habitat Debate Continued (hal. 75-118). Vancouver BC: Fraser Institute
  21. Harrison, F. (2010). The Inquest. London: Bookforce
  22. Heins, P., & Abdelazim, T. (2014). Take it to The Bank : How Land Banks Are Streghtening America's Neighborhoods. Michigan: Center for Community Progress
  23. Hermit, H. (2009). Teknik Penaksiran Harga Tanah Perkotaan: Teori dan Praktek Penilaian Tanah. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju
  24. Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation Vol 12(10)
  25. Hutagalung, A. S. (2011). Seputar Hak Pengelolaan. Yogyakarta: STPN Press
  26. Hyman, D. N. (2011). Public Finance , A Contemporary Application of Theory to Policy, 10th Edition. Mason: Cengage Learning
  27. IDB. (2010). Kendala Kritis bagi Pembangunan Infrastruktur. Islamic Development Bank
  28. Israel, A. (1990). Institutional Developmetn. Washington D.C.: World Bank
  29. Jacobs, H. M., & van der Krabben, E. (2013). Public land develpoment as a strategic tool for development : Reflections on the Dutch Experience. Land Use Policy Vol. 30 , 774-783
  30. Jacobs, J. M. (1996). Essential Assessment Criteria for Physical Education Teacher Education Programs, Disertasi. Morgantown: West Virginia University
  31. Janis, I. L. (1949). The Problem of Validating Content Analysis. New York: George W. Stewart
  32. Jones, C. G. (1975). A Delphi Evaluation of Agreement between Organization. Dalam H. A. Linstone, & M. Turoff (Eds), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (hal. 160-167). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
  33. Kehoe, D., D., M., Proudfoot, S. B., & Roberts, N. A. (1976). Public Land Ownership Frameworks for Evaluation. Massachusetts: Lexington Books
  34. Kivell, P. (1993). Land and The City. London: Routledge
  35. Kompas. (2014, April 8). Reforma Agraria Mendesak. Kompas
  36. Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknis Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana
  37. Limbong, B. (2013). Bank Tanah. Jakarta: Margaretha Pustaka
  38. Lindzey, G., & Aronson (Eds), E. (1969). Handbook of Social Psychology 3rd ed. New Yorl: Random House
  39. Ludwig, B. G. (1994). Internationalizing Extension: An Exploration of The Characteristics Evident in A State University Extension System That Achieves Internalization. Disertasi. Colombus: The Ohio State Univesity
  40. Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the Future Have you Considered using the Delphi Methodology? Journal of Extension 35(5) www.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.html. , 1-4
  41. Meyer, J. (1992). Rethinking The Outlook of Colleges Whose Roots have been in Agriculture. Davis, CA: University of California
  42. Mubyarto. (1989). Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta: LP3ES
  43. Qian, Z. (2015). Land Acquisition Compensation in post-Reform China ; Evolution, Structure and Challenges in Hangzhou. Land Use Policy 40 , 250-257
  44. Rajack, R. (2007). Does the Ownership and Management of Public Land Matter to Land Market Outcomes? 4th International Urban Research Symposium. Washington D.C: World Bank
  45. Rutten, V. W., & Hayami, Y. (1984). Toward A Theory of Induced Institutional Innovation. Minneapolis: Univers ity of Minnesota
  46. Srirangan, K. (1997). Land Policies in Delhi: Their Contribution to Unauthorised Land Development. Disertasi. London: University of London
  47. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. California: SAGE Publication
  48. Sudianto, A. (2014). The Role of Market Forces and Spatial Planning on Land Development. Case Study : Jakarta, Indonesia and Hongkong. Tesis. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung
  49. Tang, J. (2011). Review and Discussion on Land Acquisition Reform. China Land Sci. 25 , 3-7
  50. UNESCAP. (1993). Municipal Land Management in Asia : A Comparative Study. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pasific
  51. Yang, L. J., Q., H. C., G., L., Y., G., & X.L., T. (2005). The Analysis of Development of Land-banking Organizations in China. Economic Geography 25 , 557-561
  52. Yang, Z., Ren, R., Liu, H., & Zhang, H. (2015). Land Leasing and Local Government Behaviour in China: Evidence from Beijing. Urban Studies Vol. 52(5) , 841-856
  53. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press
  54. Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Li, M., Huang, Q., & Li, F. (2012). Land banking ; A Mechanism for Urban Sustainable Development in China. AMBIO 41, DOI 10.1007/sI3280-012-0297-y , 904-906
  55. Zhang, Y. (2011). Institutional Sources of Reform: The Diffusion of Land banking Systems in China. Management and Organization Review, doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00256.x
  56. Zulkaidi, D., Sari, M. K., & Navastara, A. M. (2007). Dampak Pengembangan Lahan Skala Besar terhadap Pasar Lahan dan Transformasi Peri-urban Kota Jakarta. Research Series UPDRG. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.