DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.4.1.21-28

Manfaat Taman Suropati Kota Jakarta Pusat Berdasarkan Persepsi Masyarakat Sekitar

Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia


Citation Format:
Abstract

In general in every big city has green open space that can be utilized as one of public space for society. Green open space is also an important thing in the formation of urban structures, especially in urban areas. This is because the RTH has an important role in an urban area that is there are benefits such as social, cultural, economic, aesthetic and support ecological activities. Taman Suropati Kota Jakarta has an area of 16,328 m². Visitors who come to the park pretty much especially at night. Visitors who visit Suropati Park still do not understand the benefits of the park. In this study aims to assess the benefits of Taman Suropati Kota Jakarta Central to the surrounding community is in accordance with its function or not by looking at PERMEN-PU no. 05 / PRT / M / 2008 on Guidelines for the Provision and Utilization of Green Open Space in Urban Areas based on visitor perceptions and research preferences. Taman Suropati still has ecological, social and cultural benefits which has 13 indicators in it. Taman Suropati Kota Jakarta in this case is good in ecological, social and cultural benefits, because only some of the indicators that have problems to be solved by Central Jakarta Municipality government.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Benefits; Public Green Open Space; Taman Suropati; Urban Areas

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Kajian Perubahan Morfologi Kampung Condet Sebagai Kawasan Cagar Budaya dan Buah-buahan Pengembangan Transit Oriented Development (TOD) pada Titik Transit Trase Light Rail Transit (LRT) Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Upaya Pelestarian Kawasan Bersejarah Kota Pusaka Parakan, Kabupaten Temanggung More recent articles
  1. Budihardjo, E. (2009). Kota Berkelanjutan. Bandung: PT. Alumni
  2. Darmawan, E. (2009). Ruang Publik dalam Arsitektur Kota. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip
  3. Dasimah, Illia, F., & Hanita, N. (2015). Human Interaction in Open Spaces. In Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, AcE-Bs2015, 20-22 February 2015, Tehran, Iran (Vol. 201, pp. 352–359). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.186
  4. Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 05/PRT/M/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kawasan Perkotaan
  5. Hakim, U. (2003). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap Prinsip Unsur dan Aplikasi Desain. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  6. Iswari, S. A., & Nurini. (2014). Efektivitas Taman Sriwedari Sebagai Ruang Publik di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 3
  7. Menteri Dalam Negeri. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 1 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kawasan Perkotaan
  8. Nasution. (2008). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  9. Tang, B. (2017). Explaining the Inequitable Spatial Distribution of Public Open Space in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.004
  10. Velayati, L. H., Ruliyansyah, A., & Fitrianingsih, Y. (2012). ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU ( RTH ) BERDASARKAN SERAPAN GAS CO 2 DI KOTA PONTIANAK, 1–10
  11. Xue, F., Gou, Z., Siu, S., & Lau, Y. (2017). Green open space in high-dense Asian cities: Site configurations, microclimates and users’ perceptions. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.014

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.