DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/potensi.2026.30877

Pemenuhan Standar Green Material untuk Pekerjaan Struktur pada Pembangunan Pasar Baru Ciparay

*Nisrine Thufailla  -  Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, Fakultas Pendidikan Teknik dan Industri, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The construction of the New Ciparay Market is a public infrastructure project requiring special attention to environmental sustainability. As a hub of community economic activity with high foot traffic, the market has a significant environmental impact; consequently, the use of "green materials" in structural works has become a priority to reduce the carbon footprint and create a healthy environment for vendors and visitors. This study aims to evaluate the compliance of the structural materials used in the project—specifically K-350 Ready-Mix Concrete from PT Pionir Beton Indonesia and steel from PT Gunung Garuda and PT Lautan Steel Indonesia—with green material standards. The research employs a descriptive-evaluative qualitative approach, utilizing a comparative analysis against criteria set by the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) and international standards. Evaluation parameters cover nine criteria: CFC content, durability, recycled material content, renewable sources, environmental certification, local material sourcing, Environmental Product Declarations (EPD), carbon footprint, and hazardous substance content. The results indicate varying levels of compliance: Pionir Concrete at 67% (very good), Gunung Garuda Steel at 67% (very good), and Lautan Steel at 56% (good). The primary structural materials still exhibit significant shortcomings regarding EPD documentation, carbon footprint transparency, and verification of recycled material content. Recommendations include incorporating green material requirements into technical specifications for government projects, mandating the provision of EPDs and ISO 14001 certification from suppliers, and implementing a structured green material verification system for public infrastructure projects.
Fulltext Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
  1. Chandra, C., Kusumaningdyah, N.H., & Gunawan, R. (2022). Penggunaan Dan Hambatan Green Material Pada Perumahan Sederhana Di Kota Surabaya Dan Sekitarnya. Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, 11(1), 8-14
  2. Green Building Council Indonesia. (2021). Greenship untuk Bangunan Baru Versi 1.1 Ringkasan Kriteria dan Tolak Ukur. Jakarta: GBCI
  3. IEA. (2023). Energy Technology Perspectives 2023. Paris: International Energy Agency
  4. Nayem, N.H. (2023). The Potential of Sustainable Materials for Green Building Practices. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 11(3), 30-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20231103.11
  5. SNI 2052:2017. (2017). Baja Tulangan Beton. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia
  6. Althoey, F., Ansari, W.S., Sufian, M., & Deifalla, A.F. (2023). Advancements in Low-Carbon Concrete as a Construction Material for the Sustainable Built Environment. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devbe.2023.100284
  7. Branca, T.A., Colla, V., Algermissen, D., Granbom, H., Martini, U., Morillon, A., Pietruck, R., & Rosendahl, S. (2020). Reuse and Recycling of By-Products in the Steel Sector: Recent Achievements Paving the Way to Circular Economy and Industrial Symbiosis in Europe. Metals, 10(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10030345
  8. Dhull, N. (2024). Recycled Steel and its Role in Sustainable Construction. AZoBuild. Retrieved from https://www.azobuild.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=8693
  9. Johnstone, L., & Hallberg, P. (2020). ISO 14001 Adoption and Environmental Performance in Small to Medium Sized Enterprises. Journal of Environmental Management, 266, 110592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110592
  10. Puma, G.C.C., Salles, A., Turk, J., Ungureanu, V., & Bragança, L. (2024). Utilisation of Reused Steel and Slag: Analysing the Circular Economy Benefits through Three Case Studies. Buildings, 14(4), 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040979
  11. Yang, M., Chen, L., Lai, J., Osman, A.I., Farghali, M., Rooney, D.W., & Yap, P.S. (2024). Advancing Environmental Sustainability in Construction through Innovative Low-Carbon, High-Performance Cement-Based Composites: A Review. Materials Today Sustainability, 26, 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100712
  12. Future Market Insights. (2024). Green Building Materials Market Forecast 2025 to 2035. Retrieved from https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/green-building-materials-market
  13. Grand View Research. (2024). Green Building Materials Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product, By Application, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2025-2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/green-building-materials-market
  14. Lahcen, B., Brusselaers, J., Vrancken, K., Dams, Y., Da Silva Paes, C., Eyckmans, J., & Rousseau, S. (2020). Green Recovery Policies for the COVID-19 Crisis: Modelling the Impact on the Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(4), 731-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00454-9
  15. Mordor Intelligence. (2025). Green Buildings Market Size & Share Analysis - Industry Research Report - Growth Trends. Retrieved from https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/green-building-market
  16. UNEP. (2020). 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.