DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pls.32097

Pengakuan Perkawinan Sesama Jenis Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum Studi Indonesia, Belanda, Dan Amerika Serikat

*M. Abrar Dahlan  -  Pascasarjana, Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
M. Riduan  -  Pascasarjana, Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Mustika Puteri  -  Pascasarjana, Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze and compare the legal frameworks concerning the recognition of same-sex marriage in three countries with contrasting legal characteristics: Indonesia, the Netherlands, and the United States. The research seeks to examine how differences in philosophical foundations, moral values, and legal systems in each country respond to global social dynamics on this issue

Methodology/Approach/Design: This study employs a normative legal research method with a comparative approach. Analysis was conducted on positive legal instruments, court decisions, and policy documents in each respective country. The theoretical scope of the research encompasses human rights (HAM) discourse, principles of equality, and the integration of religious values in family law.

Results and Discussion: The findings reveal distinct legalization mechanisms: the Netherlands pursued a parliamentary legislative route grounded in secularism, while the United States proceeded through a judicial pathway via interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. In contrast, Indonesia firmly rejects such recognition, as the institution of marriage is absolutely grounded in religious norms and the pillar of Belief in the One and Only God (Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa). These differences create a sharp dichotomy between states that view marriage as a gender-neutral civil contract and those that regard it as a heteronormative sacred bond.

Practical: In practical terms, these legal differences give rise to complexities in Private International Law, particularly regarding the validity of cross-border marital status. This study recommends the need for legal certainty for states in responding to social change without sacrificing their national legal identity. The legal implications encompass issues of civil registration administration, inheritance rights, and the differing recognition of adoption across jurisdictions

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
  1. Abdullah, L. O. D., Pratiwi, E. T., & Soepardy, A. M. (2023). Kajian Hukum perkawinan Sesama Jenis ( LGBT ) Menurut Norma Agama Islam dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Prosiding Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab Dan Dakwah IAIN Kerinci, 1(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.58878/sutasoma.v2i2.296
  2. Ahmad Ega Putra Dani1, M. D. (2023). KETENTUAN PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DI INDONESIA DAN BELANDA. KETENTUAN PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DI INDONESIA DAN BELANDA, 12(1), 121–137
  3. Amania, M. H., & Yazidi, N. S. (2025). Convergence and Divergence of Same-Sex Marriage Policies ( A Comparative Study of Constitutional and Administration Law in Three Core Countries of the European Union ). JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES, 9(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v9i3.18081
  4. Ayuningrum, A., Patrecia, A. H., Puspayanti, D., & Lorensia, D. (2023). Perspektif Agama-Agama Di Indonesia Terhadap Homoseksual. Moderasi: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, 1–15. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/moderasi/article/view/468/216
  5. Azalia Salsabila, A. H. (2025). ANALISIS ISU PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DALAM HUKUM ISLAM DI INDONESIA : PERBANDINGAN DENGAN. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 1635–1648. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1155
  6. Dedy, I. K., Mahendra, J., Agung, A., Intan, A., & Rainy, N. W. (2025). Peran Taylor Swift Sebagai Norm Entrepreneurs Dalam Upaya Promosi Equality Rights di Amerika Serikat. Diskusi Ilmiah Komunitas Hubungan Internasional, 5(1), 16–30. https://ejournal2.unud.ac.id/index.php/dikshi/article/view/411/1141
  7. Elit Ave Hidayatullah, Rahmatiah, Arsya Naya, Inayah Aqilah Bakhtiar, B. M. (2025). Relativisme dalam Isu Pernikahan Sesama Jenis : Analisis Epistemologi Tauhid Naquib Al-Attas. Zawiyah Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 11(2), 143–154. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/zawiyah/article/view/13414
  8. Estede, S., Saputra, E., Saragih, M. W., & Ansor, M. (2025). Hak Asasi Manusia di Tengah Polarisasi Sosial (F. A. P. Hsg (ed.)). PT. Star Digital Publishing. http://www.stardigitalpublishing.com
  9. Fikri, Budiman, & Sunuwati. (2022). Hukum Islam dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Transformasi Sosial Perkawinan Sesama Jenis (Aris (ed.); p. 80). IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press
  10. Hayati, Z., Hadits, S. R., & Hafidzi, A. (2025). PENGAKUAN PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS : KOMPARASIHUKUM PERKAWINAN BELANDA DAN INDONESIA. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence,Economic and Legal Theory, 1496–1507. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1135
  11. Ibra, M., Maulana, A., Nugraha, T. A., & Rasyad, M. A. (2025). Dworkin dan Tradisi Common Law : Implikasi Filosofis dan Praktis. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humanioral, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx
  12. Indonesia, R. (1974). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/36382/UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974.pdf
  13. Jekalaya, I. W., Suradigama, I. W., & Suartini, M. (2024). Pembaharuan Hukum Perkawinan Campuran di Indonesia. Jurnal Sutasoma (Science Teknologi Sosial Humaniora), 02(02), 98–104
  14. Maulana, I. R. (2022). Analisis Peran Komunitas LGBTQ + dalam Panggung Politik Amerika Serikat Menurut Lensa Neomarxisme. 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irfan-Maulana-22/publication/372588438_Analisis_Peran_Komunitas_LGBTQ_dalam_Panggung_Politik_Amerika_Serikat_Menurut_Lensa_Neomarxisme/links/64bf64768de7ed28bac0443b/Analisis-Peran-Komunitas-LGBTQ-dalam-Panggung-Politik-Amerika-Serikat-Menurut-Lensa-Neomarxisme.pdf
  15. Muhammad Arsy Alhafidz Revianto, N. P. A. (2024). KEMUNCULAN KEMBALI FENOMENA LGBTQ DI NEGARA-NEGARA BARAT DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA PEMIKIRAN MASYARAKAT DUNIA. JIPKM : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Dan Kesehatan Masyarakat, 2(2), 267–291. https://jipkm.com/index.php/jipkm/article/view/167
  16. Putera, J. J. (2024). PRO DAN KONTRA LEGALISASI PERKAWINAN. Jurnal Multilingual, 4(4), 1–15. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/multilingual/article/view/936/816
  17. Putri, R. I. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Perkawinan Pada Status Perkawinan Transgender Di Indonesia. Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum, 2(1), 240–250. https://journal.salahuddinal-ayyubi.com/index.php/AlIJIH/article/view/401/645
  18. Rahman, Nur Syafira, C. H. (2023). Representasi gay dalam pemberitaan di media online. Lektur : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), 156–164. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/610e/ce2657c6f35a498eead78cf35b1e4b1b5588.pdf
  19. Rahman, M. R., Rizani, M., & Amruzi, M. F. Al. (2025). Same-Sex Marriage: A Comparative Study of Indonesian, Netherlands, And American Legal Regulations and Their Socio-Legal Implications. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON” “Inclusive Legal Futures : Islamic Perspectives, Constitutional Developments, and Comparative Law,” 223–239. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/jils/article/view/17826/4570
  20. Rani Nuraeni, Maruli Tua Tampubolon, Atmoro, Habib, T. H. (2024). Pernikahan Sesama Jenis : Tinjauan Hak dan Kewajiban. Jurnal Syntax Dmiration, 5(10), 4207–4218. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i10.1640
  21. Risnandar, K., Ghofar, A., & Arpansyah, M. (2025). Pencegahan Dan Pembatalan Perkawinan Menurut Undang- Undang No . 1 Tahun 1974. Jurnal Sahabat ISNU-SU (JSISNU), 2(1), 60–65. https://journal.isnu-sumut.org/index.php/jsisnu/article/view/737/240
  22. Rokan, M. K. (2025). Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Perubahan Nilai Perkawinan Keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 3(2), 61–69
  23. Sugiarto, A., & Putra, M. D. (2024). The Convergence Between Textual Law And Progressive Law In Addressing Contemporary Legal Challenges Titik Temu Antara Hukum Tekstual Dan Hukum Progresif Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 10(2), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6780
  24. Tarring, A. D. (2022). Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Julia Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 9(4), 137–145. https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/109/88
  25. Tsabitha, C. M., & Rosmaya, I. (2025). Comparative Study of the Criminal Regulation of Homosexual Acts in Indonesian and Malaysian Law. YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice, 4(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v4i2.793
  26. Wicaksono, A. T., Pamungkas, A. G., Coppiens, C. A., & Mar’ah, S. (2023). Probabilitas Indonesia Untuk Melegalisasi Perkawinan Sejenis Akibat Kampanye dan Propaganda LGBTQ ( Studi Kasus Negara Asia- Amerika ) Pendahuluan Istilah perkawinan mulai bergumam sejak ribuan tahun lalu sebelum masehi . Dimana jelas perkawinan merupakan. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum Volume, 4(4), 396–426. https://jurnalfsh.uinsa.ac.id/mhs/index.php/mal/article/view/301
  27. Yaqin, H. C. dan A. A. (2021). Perdebatan dan Fenomena Global Legalisasi Pernikahan Sesama Jenis : Studi Kasus Amerika Serikat , Singapura , dan Indonesia The Global Debate and Phenomenon of Studies of the United States , Singapore and Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 139–167. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Perdebatan-dan-Fenomena-Global-Legalisasi-Sesama-Chalid-Yaqin/a1181925757d8c276d25e5b2234452dd87fcdb38#citing-papers
  28. Yasyfa, Hasna, Sonny Dewi Judiasih, E. N. (2024). AKIBAT HUKUM PERJANJIAN KAWIN PADA PERKAWINAN SEJENIS masyarakat , serta menetapkan hak dan tanggung jawab yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan keluarga . 1 ( selanjutnya disingkat menjadi KUH Perdata ) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Dalam agama. Jurnal Hukum Kenotarisan, 8(1), 16–30. https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/1841/857

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.