Pembentukan Lembaga Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Umum dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Electoral Justice System

*Muhammad Haris Zulkarnain  -  Universitas Jakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research is to identify the urgency of establishing a special election justice institution in order to realize an election justice system in Indonesia.

Methodology/Approach/Design: This research uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach. This method allows researchers to analyze statutory regulations, the role and authority of institutions that handle electoral disputes and disputes in Indonesia so far, as well as case studies of the form of special election judicial institutions in other countries.

Results and Discussion: In facing every problem related to holding elections in Indonesia, effective efforts and systems are needed to overcome them. Realizing an electoral justice system in elections, one of which is through the establishment of a special election justice institution. Special election institutions are tasked with completing resolutions and election cases more quickly, effectively and focused because they are carried out by just one institution. The format and form of special election judicial institutions can be adapted to the interests and electoral problems that exist in Indonesia.

Practical Implications: This research has practical implications for realizing an electoral justice system in the implementation of democratic parties in Indonesia. The existence of a special election judicial institution can help change the current state's legal and institutional practices to be better, integrated and not overlapping between institutions in their authority to handle electoral disputes and disputes, whether in presidential elections, legislative elections, or regional head elections. It is hoped that efforts to establish a special election judicial institution can provide justice, benefit and legal certainty regarding disputes and disputes in elections in Indonesia.

Novelty/Value: This research contributes to providing new ideas in handling election cases and disputes in Indonesia through a special election judicial institution. The value of this research lies in a better understanding of the importance of the electoral justice system so that the quality of the implementation of democracy in Indonesia can continue to be improved. Efforts to create an effective legal system based on the legal system theory of Lawrence Mier Friedman and the goals to be achieved from this system based on Satjipto Rahardjo's legal political theory are the added value of this research.

Keywords: General Elections. Special Judicial Institutions. Electoral Justice System.

Fulltext View|Download
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Relevansi Living Law Theorie dalam RUU Masyarakat Adat Pada Sistem Negara Hukum Prismatik Feminis Legal Theory dalam Kerangka Hukum Indonesia Pembentukan Lembaga Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Umum dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Electoral Justice System More recent articles
  1. Buku:
  2. Friedman, Lawrence Mier. (2009). American Law in the 20th Centruy. Yale University Press
  3. Gaffar, Janedri M. ( 2013). Politik Hukum Pemilu. Konstitusi Press
  4. Hakim, A.A. (2011). Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar
  5. Huda, Uu Nurul. (2018). Hukum Partai Politik dan Pemilu di Indonesia. Fokusmedia
  6. IFES. (2011). Pedoman Untuk Memahami, Menangani, dan Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pemilu. IFES
  7. International IDEA. (2010). Electoral Justice: An Overview of the International IDEA Handbook. Trydells Tryckeri AB
  8. Komisi Yudisial. (2013). Putih Hitam Pengadilan Khusus. Pusat Analisis dan Layanan Informasi Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial
  9. Mujahidin, Ahmad. (2007). Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia. Refika Aditama
  10. Santoso, Topo. (2006). Penegakan Hukum Pemilu: Praktik Pemilu 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009-2014. Perludem
  11. Santoso, Topo. (2006). Tindak Pidana Pemilu. Sinar Grafika
  12. Thompson, Brian. (1993). Textbook on Constitutional & Administrative Law. Blackstone Press Limited
  13. Tjenreng, M.B. Zubakhrum. (2016). Pilkada Serentak, Penguatan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Pustaka Kemang
  14. Jurnal:
  15. Azmi, Rama Halim Nur. (2020). Urgensi Realisasi Badan Peradilan Pilkada Untuk Menciptakan Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil pilkada Yang Efektif dan Konstitusional. Jurnal Adyasta Pemilu, 3(2), 185
  16. Bisariyadi, Triningsih, Anna., & Rahmawaty, Meyrinda. (2016). Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(3)
  17. Djohan, Naufal Hasanuddin. (2023). Menemukenali Efektivitas Penghapusan Perdagangan Orang Dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum Untuk Perempuan di Indonesia. Progressive Law and Society (PLS), 1(1),6
  18. Latifiani et,al. (2022). Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 441-448
  19. Mirza, Ahmad., et.al. (2019). Pergeseran Rezim Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(3)
  20. Nugraha, Fajar Kuala., (2016). “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Dalam Sengketa Pemilu Kepala Daerah (Pilkada), Jurnal Transformative, 2(1), 59
  21. Pratama, Surya Mukti., Nurlela, Ela., Sitepu, Hendry Gian Dynantheo. (2021). Gagasan Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pilkada Dalam Mewujudkan Electoral Justice. Jurnal Yustika, 24(1), 16
  22. Rois, I., & Herawati, Ratna., (2018). Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum Udayana, 7(2), 272
  23. Saragih, A.D.A. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Pentingnya Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Dalam Pmeilu Serentak Menurut Undang-Undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Lex et Societatis, 5(3), 167-175
  24. Utami, Nofi Sri. (2019). Problematika Pola Penyelesaian Persoalan Pemilu (Pelanggaran & Sengketa) Yang Terpisah Pisah. Journal kpu: electoral research, 2-3
  25. Wicaksono, Dian Agung., & Ayutama, Ola Anisa. (2015). Inisiasi Pengdilan Khusus Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dalam Menghadapi Keserentakan Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, Dan Walikota Di Indonesia 1. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 4(1)
  26. Internet:
  27. Gaffar, Janedri M. (2012). Lembaga Peradilan Pemilu, https://nasional.sindonews.com/berita/673846/18/lembaga-peradilan-pemilu
  28. Perludem. (2021). Perludem: Ada 136 Permohonan Sengketa Pilkada 2020 di MK, https://perludem.org/2021/01/13/perludem-ada-136-permohonan-sengketa-pilkada-2020-di-mk/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.