BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LDJR32250, author = {Nur Qodri and Levina Yustitianingtyas}, title = {Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pengusahaan Energi Panas Bumi Atas Dampak Ekstraktif Bagi Keadilan Ekologis Masyarakat Dieng}, journal = {Law, Development and Justice Review}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Geothermal Energy; Ecological Justice; State Accountability.}, abstract = { Indonesia has a geothermal energy potential of 24 GW; however, two decades of development in the Dieng Geothermal Working Area (WKP) have been marred by H₂S gas leaks, aquifer contamination, and ecological conflicts, highlighting a legal gap between energy transition policies and the protection of community rights. This gap is reflected in the suboptimal regulations regarding legal protection, public participation, and state accountability for the extractive impacts of geothermal development. This study aims to analyze guarantees of legal protection and ecological justice for the people of Dieng, evaluate the effectiveness of the state accountability model, and formulate an ideal legal framework. The study employs a normative legal method with a legislative and conceptual approach, accompanied by descriptive-prescriptive analysis through content analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicate that legal protection guarantees remain ineffective because the centralization of permitting under Law No. 6 of 2023 limits public participation and weakens the preventive function of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The state accountability model is also ineffective as it continues to rely on proving fault following the erosion of the strict liability principle, thereby failing to provide optimal protection for affected communities. These research findings can serve as a basis for government policy to strengthen legal protection by reinstating the principle of strict liability, enhancing public participation based on Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), and integrating a human rights perspective to achieve ecological justice. }, issn = {2655-1942}, pages = {183--205} doi = {10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.183-205}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/32250} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Indonesia has a geothermal energy potential of 24 GW; however, two decades of development in the Dieng Geothermal Working Area (WKP) have been marred by H₂S gas leaks, aquifer contamination, and ecological conflicts, highlighting a legal gap between energy transition policies and the protection of community rights. This gap is reflected in the suboptimal regulations regarding legal protection, public participation, and state accountability for the extractive impacts of geothermal development. This study aims to analyze guarantees of legal protection and ecological justice for the people of Dieng, evaluate the effectiveness of the state accountability model, and formulate an ideal legal framework. The study employs a normative legal method with a legislative and conceptual approach, accompanied by descriptive-prescriptive analysis through content analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicate that legal protection guarantees remain ineffective because the centralization of permitting under Law No. 6 of 2023 limits public participation and weakens the preventive function of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The state accountability model is also ineffective as it continues to rely on proving fault following the erosion of the strict liability principle, thereby failing to provide optimal protection for affected communities. These research findings can serve as a basis for government policy to strengthen legal protection by reinstating the principle of strict liability, enhancing public participation based on Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), and integrating a human rights perspective to achieve ecological justice.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)
Diterbitkan Oleh:
Diponegoro Law Firm, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Bekerjasama dengan DPC PERADI Semarang.
DLF, Gedung PKM Lt. 1. Jl. A. Suroyo, Gd Prof. Purwahid Patrik, Tembalang-Semarang
Email: diponegorolawfirm@live.undip.ac.id Telp. 024-76918201 Fax. 024-76918206 View My Stats
