Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu

Muhammad Difa Sirojul Hakim; Budi Santoso

doi:10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.274-293

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.274-293

Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu

*Muhammad Difa Sirojul Hakim - Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Budi Santoso - Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{LDJR29641,
    author = {Muhammad Sirojul Hakim and Budi Santoso},
    title = {Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu},
    journal = {Law,  Development and Justice Review},
  volume = {8},
    number = {3},
    year = {2025},
    keywords = {Notary; Legal Service; Incapatitaed People.},
    abstract = {  Implementing good notary services can increase public trust in the notary institution itself. Reputation and trust are very important in the business world. However, not all people in Indonesia have the same economic capabilities, there are also less well-off people. Legal services in the notary sector are needed by all levels of society. Article 37 Paragraph (1) of the Law on the Position of Notaries states that Notaries must provide protection and guarantee legal certainty to the public regardless of the economic capacity of their clients. This research aims to determine the factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford it in accordance with Article 37 paragraph (1) UUJN, as well as to determine the legal consequences for notaries who do not carry out these obligations. The method used is a normative legal research method with a legal concept analysis approach and a legislative approach. The research results show that there are several factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford them, namely human factors, the notary's confidence, and the client's candor. These three factors encourage notaries to provide free legal services. In addition, if a notary does not provide free legal services to people who cannot afford it, the notary may be subject to sanctions. Acceptable sanctions include verbal warnings, written warnings, temporary dismissal, honorable dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.  },
   issn = {2655-1942},   pages = {274--293}  doi = {10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.274-293},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/29641}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Implementing good notary services can increase public trust in the notary institution itself. Reputation and trust are very important in the business world. However, not all people in Indonesia have the same economic capabilities, there are also less well-off people. Legal services in the notary sector are needed by all levels of society. Article 37 Paragraph (1) of the Law on the Position of Notaries states that Notaries must provide protection and guarantee legal certainty to the public regardless of the economic capacity of their clients. This research aims to determine the factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford it in accordance with Article 37 paragraph (1) UUJN, as well as to determine the legal consequences for notaries who do not carry out these obligations. The method used is a normative legal research method with a legal concept analysis approach and a legislative approach. The research results show that there are several factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford them, namely human factors, the notary's confidence, and the client's candor. These three factors encourage notaries to provide free legal services. In addition, if a notary does not provide free legal services to people who cannot afford it, the notary may be subject to sanctions. Acceptable sanctions include verbal warnings, written warnings, temporary dismissal, honorable dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Notary; Legal Service; Incapatitaed People.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review

Recent articles

Dehumanisasi dan Krisis Kesadaran Hukum di Era Industri Modern: Kajian Sosiologis atas Hilangnya Moralitas dalam Relasi Produksi Penerapan Sandera Pajak (Gijzeling) sebagai Instrumen Penagihan Pajak di Indonesia Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu More recent articles

Buku
Moleong, L. J, 2012, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (30th ed.), PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung
Artikel Jurnal
Aldi Arshandi, Aktris Nuryanti, Ismawartati, Analisis Penerapan Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Bagi Masyarakat Miskin, Tanjungpura Acta Borneo Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26418/tabj.v2i2.69014
Astri Dewi Setyarini, Kayus Kayowuan L, Pentingnya Penerapan Kode Etik Atas Etika Profesi Hukum Pada Profesi Notaris, Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Vo. 1, No. 5, 2023. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/Socius/article/view/48
Ayuningtyas, Pratiwi, Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melanggar Kode Etik, Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2020. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i2.637
Buko, Sisika Harun, Analisis Yuridis Tentang Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasanya Kepada Masyarakat Yang Tidak Mampu Berdasarkan UU No. 2 Tahun 2014, Lex Privatum, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/15116
Cica Vadilla, Nabilla Alya Rahmah, Baidhowl, Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Terhadap Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta, As-Salam Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v12i1.495
Debriana Novianti, Devany Putri Prasetia, Sahla Billah Sahira, Penerapan Etika Dan Transparansi Notaris Dalam Akta Otentik, Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humanioral, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2024. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/429
Diah Ayu Puspita Sari, Suhariningsih, Nurdin, Makna Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu Terkait Sanksi Yang Diberikan Oleh Undang-Undang Jika Tidak Dipenuhi, Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2016. https://doi.org/10.21608/bfag.2014.21450
Gitayani, Luh Putu Cynthia. Penerapan Etika Profesi Oleh Notaris Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan Jasa Kepada Klien. Acta Comitas, Vol. 3, No. 34, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i03.p03
Kristiawan, Yhan, Implementasi Substansi Prinsip Kejelasan Rumusan Dalam Penyusunan Kode Etik Notaris Di Indonesia, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v13i1.2085
Kristyanto & F. Wisnaeni, Pemberian Jasa Hukum Bidang Kenotariatan Berdasarkan Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus Notaris Di Kota Semarang), Notarius, vol. 11, no. 2, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.11.2i.2018.266-282
Nur Fauzia, Tanggung Jawab Kekuatan Mengikat Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta-Akta Notaris Di Wilayah Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat, Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v16i1.85
Oktavia, S. A., Tondy, C. J., & Widyanti, A. N, Pembatasan Kriteria Tidak Mampu Yang Wajib Diberikan Jasa Hukum Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Berdasarkan Pasal 37 Undang Undang Jabatan Notaris. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Vo. 2, No. 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i9.1499
Permenta, Florence, Sanksi Bagi Notaris Yang Menolak Memberikan Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu, Recital Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/10673
Putri Anjulika, Apriliana, Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Tanpa Honorarium Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu, Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i1.1920
Utami, Nuryanti Puji, Penerapan Pemberian Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Berdasar Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Di Kabupaten Malang, Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2017.003.01.10
Wiratama, M. A. H. P., Surata, I. N., & Arta, I. K. K, Implementasi Kewajiban Notaris Memberikan Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu (Studi Di Kantor Notaris Komang Hendy Prabawa, Sh, M. Kn.). Jurnal Kertha Widya, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37637/kw.v12i1.1959
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN)
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 19 Tahun 2021 tentang Formasi Jabatan Notaris dan Penentuan Kategori Daerah
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang Tugas dan Fungsi, Syarat, serta Tata Cara Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Notaris
Kode Etik Notaris – Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI)
Hasil Penelitian/Tugas Akhir
Krisdiana. 2022. Implementasi Kewajiban Notaris Memberikan Pelayanan Jasa Hukum Bagi Orang Tidak Mampu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII), Yogyakarta
Simatupang. Jonathan Parulian Ronaldo, 2020. Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Notaris Berupa Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Tanpa Memungut Honorarium Bagi Masyarakat Tidak Mampu Di Kota Semarang, Skripsi, Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang (USM), Semarang
Sinta, 2014, Implementasi Pemberian Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Di Kota Makassar, Skripsi, Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum, UIN Alauddin, Makassar
Yustisianto, Dwi. 2022. Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu Di Kabupaten Temanggung, Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)