Kajian Pelaksanaan Konsep Kampung Tematik di Kampung Hidroponik Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Kota Semarang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.6.1.40-57

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 29-04-2018
Section: Articles
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

Poverty and poor settlement problems seem inseparable from the urban living space including in Semarang City. One of the Semarang City Government policy innovations to tackle the poverty problems along with urban settlement improvement has been introduced in “GERBANG HEBAT” Program through the formation of kampung tematik (thematic kampong). In line with city development acceleration, thematic kampong needs a comprehensive planning for ensuring its sustainability. Representing a thematic kampong, Hydroponics Kampung in Tanjung Mas Subdistrict is dealing with high poverty level issue. The chosen hydroponics theme has in fact brought forward development complexity in nature against the existing coastal area characteristics. This study aims to examine the implementation of thematic kampong concept as well as the affecting factors towards its ineffectiveness. The research method applies qualitative descriptive data analysis. The results indicate the implementation process of kampong thematic concept in Hydroponics Kampung failed to encourage community empowerment. Hydroponic cultivation to which community welfare improvement sought for has no longer attractive and sustainable. The failure is caused by several factors such as poor kampong improvement planning, poor technical implementation process, the chosen thematic mismatch to the kampong potentials, and the lack of community knowledge and awareness.

Keywords

concept implementation; failure factors; hydroponic; thematic kampong

  1. Anindya Putri Tamara 
    Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Mardwi Rahdriawan 
    Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  1. Arbi, M. (2016). Kajian sebaran produksi dan perdagangan serta karakteristik konsumen sayuran hidroponik di Kota Palembang. Agriekonomika, 5(1), 54–63. Retrieved from http://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/agriekonomika/article/view/1359.
  2. Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Atkočiūnienė, V., & Kaminaitė, G. (2017). The drivers of thematic village’s development in strengthening their vitality. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 39(2), 139–147. doi:10.15544/mts.2017.10.Vol.
  4. Dimitra, S., & Yuliastuti, N. (2012). Potensi kampung nelayan sebagai modal permukiman berkelanjutan di Tambaklorok, Kelurahan Tanjung Mas. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 1(1), 11–19. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/409.
  5. Fosso, A., & Kahane, R. (2013). Urban and peri urban horticulture in Namibia. Acta Horticulturae, 1007, 821–827. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1007.98.
  6. Gernowo, R., Kusworo, A., & Arifin, Z. (2013). Pengukuran variabilitas Co2 dan analisis dampak perubahan iklim (studi kasus: Semarang). Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics, 3(2), 144–149. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijap/article/view/1248.
  7. Heriwibowo, K., & Budiana, N. S. (2014). Hidroponik sayuran untuk hobi dan bisnis. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
  8. Idziak, W., Majewski, J., & Zmyślony, P. (2015). Community participation in sustainable rural tourism experience creation: A long-term appraisal and lessons from a thematic villages project in Poland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(8–9), 1341–1362. doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1019513.
  9. Indarti, I. (2015). Pemberdayaan sumber daya masyarakat pesisir berbasis nelayan berkelanjutan di wilayah pesisir Semarang. Fokus Ekonomi, 10(1), 44–61. Retrieved from http://ejournal.stiepena.ac.id/index.php/fe/article/download/72/69.
  10. Kłoczko-Gajewska, A. (2013). General characteristics of thematic villages in Poland. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 60–63. doi:10.2478/vjbsd-2013-0012.
  11. Kloczko-Gajewska, A. (2014). Can we treat thematic villages as social innovations? Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 2(3), 49–59. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/188135.html.
  12. Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  13. Mursidik, E. M., Samsiyah, N., & Rudyanto, H. E. (2015). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam memecahkan masalah matematika open-ended ditinjau dari tingkat kemampuan matematika pada siswa sekolah dasar. Journal Pedagogia, 4(1), 23–33.
  14. Mussadun, M., & Nurpratiwi, P. (2016). Kajian penyebab kemiskinan masyarakat nelayan di Kampung Tambak Lorok. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 27(1), 49–67. doi:10.5614/jrcp.2016.27.1.5.
  15. Rejekiningsih, T. W. (2011). Identifikasi faktor penyebab kemiskinan di Kota Semarang dari dimensi kultural. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 12(1), 28–44. Retrieved from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/JEP/article/view/203.
  16. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Suradisastra, K. (2008). Strategi pemberdayaan kelembagaan petani. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 26(2), 82–91. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/fae/article/view/3938.