Strategies for the Neutralization of the Carbon Footprint at the University of the State of Mexico

Mariana Ortiz Reynoso; Juan Roberto Calderon Maya; Noe Armando Colin Mercado; Yoselin Montoya Garcia

doi:10.14710/jsp.0.29879

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.0.29879

Strategies for the Neutralization of the Carbon Footprint at the University of the State of Mexico

*Mariana Ortiz Reynoso

- Pharmaceutics Laboratory, College of Chemistry, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico

Juan Roberto Calderon Maya

- Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico

Noe Armando Colin Mercado - Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico

Yoselin Montoya Garcia - Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JSP29879,
    author = {Mariana Reynoso and Juan Maya and Noe Mercado and Yoselin Garcia},
    title = {Strategies for the Neutralization of the Carbon Footprint at the University of the State of Mexico},
    journal = {Journal of Sustainability Perspectives},
  volume = {5},
    number = {3},
    year = {2025},
    keywords = {},
    abstract = {Climate Change, driven by greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), demands concrete responses from all sectors, including the higher education party. This research aimed to calculate the carbon footprint (CF) generated by the core activities of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, UAEMEX) from 2021 to 2024, and to propose strategies for its neutralization. A hybrid methodology was adopted, based on international standards such as ISO 14064-1:2019, PAS 2050, PAS 2060 and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, adapted to the characteristics of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This approach classified emissions into three scopes: direct emissions from fossil fuels (Scope 1), indirect emissions from electricity consumption (Scope 2) and other indirect emissions associated with waste management, paper consumption and infrastructure (Scope 3). The results indicate a 99% increase in the institutional carbon footprint between 2021 and 2022, linked to the resumption of face-to-face activities caused by COVID-19, subsequently by stabilization in the generation of HC in the subsequent years. Effective mitigation actions were identified, avoiding nearly 10 million kg CO₂e, with emphasis on sustainable university transport, process digitalization and carbon absorption through green areas. The study proposes a comprehensive neutralization plan and a replicable methodology, positioning UAEMEX as a national benchmark in university sustainability and contributing to global climate commitments through institutional management.},
   issn = {2797-7137},   pages = {389--400}  doi = {10.14710/jsp.0.29879},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/29879}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Climate Change, driven by greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), demands concrete responses from all sectors, including the higher education party. This research aimed to calculate the carbon footprint (CF) generated by the core activities of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, UAEMEX) from 2021 to 2024, and to propose strategies for its neutralization. A hybrid methodology was adopted, based on international standards such as ISO 14064-1:2019, PAS 2050, PAS 2060 and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, adapted to the characteristics of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This approach classified emissions into three scopes: direct emissions from fossil fuels (Scope 1), indirect emissions from electricity consumption (Scope 2) and other indirect emissions associated with waste management, paper consumption and infrastructure (Scope 3). The results indicate a 99% increase in the institutional carbon footprint between 2021 and 2022, linked to the resumption of face-to-face activities caused by COVID-19, subsequently by stabilization in the generation of HC in the subsequent years. Effective mitigation actions were identified, avoiding nearly 10 million kg CO₂e, with emphasis on sustainable university transport, process digitalization and carbon absorption through green areas. The study proposes a comprehensive neutralization plan and a replicable methodology, positioning UAEMEX as a national benchmark in university sustainability and contributing to global climate commitments through institutional management.

Fulltext

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Original Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 5, No 3 (2025)

Recent articles

Strengthening the 3C Partnership for Sustainable District University Nature Trails as Experiential Tools for Shaping Student Sustainability Attitudes: A Case Study from the University of Sopron (Hungary) Fostering a Sustainable University in Germany - Setting, Infrastructure and Perspectives More recent articles

IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; 2019
IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; 2021
WMO. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin - No. 18; 2022
NASA. Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://climate.nasa.gov
UNFCCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Greenhouse Gas Data; 2022
SEMARNAT. National Inventory of Greenhouse Gas and Compound Emissions 1990-2015. Minist Environ Nat Resour; 2019
EPA USEPA. Overview of Greenhouse Gases [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
IEA. Global Energy Review: CO₂ Emissions in 2021. International Energy Agency; 2022
IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report; 2021
Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press; 2007
Rockström J, et. al. A Safe Operating for HUmanity. Feature. 2009;461:472-475
Wiedmann T, Minx J. A definition of 'carbon footprint'. In C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological Economics Research Trends. Nova Science Publishers; 2008. p. 1-11
Valderrama JO. Carbon footprint, a concept that cannot be absent from engineering and science courses. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín. 2011;10(19):9-19
Guerra J, Rincón I. Calculation of the Ecological Footprint. Luna Azul Magazine. 2018;46:3-19
ISO. ISO 14064-1:2019 Greenhouse gases — Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organizational level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals; 2019
WRI & WBCSD. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2004
BSI (British Standards Institution). PAS 2050: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI Group; 2011
EPA. Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2022
Curran, MA. Life cycle assessment student handbook. New Jersey: Wiley; 2017
Arena AP. Method and Guidance for Undertaking Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bioenergy Products and Projects. Canberra: National TeCFnological University; 2017
INECC. National Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change. 2021
Cifuentes-Tapia A, Manríquez P, Urrutia M. Integrating Environmental Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: Review and Perspectives. Ibero-American Journal of Higher Education. 2020;11(31):23-41
Gallari MP, Anaya A de la G, Puebla JMA. The Carbon Footprint of the University of Valencia: diagnosis, analysis and evaluation. University of Valencia. 2011;89:97-112
UC (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile). UC Carbon Neutrality [Internet]; 2020. Available from: https://sustentable.uc.cl/
UNA (National University of Costa Rica). Environmental Management Report. Heredia: UNA; 2019
ECLAC. Methodologies for calculating the carbon footprint and its potential implications for Latin America [Internet]. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean; 2010. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11362/37288
BSI. The Guide to PAS 2050:2011 How to Carbon Footprint Your Products, Identify Hotspots and Reduce Emissions in Your Supply Chain. London: BSI; 2011
British Standards Institution (BSI). PAS 2060:2014 Specification for the demonstration of carbon neutrality. BSI. 2014
ISO. ISO 14064-1:2019 Greenhouse gases — Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organizational level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO; 2019
Díaz A, Pareja M. University buildings and their environmental impact: sustainability CFallenges. Ibero-American Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2022;13(2):45-62
UNEP. 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. United Nations Environment Programme; 2020
Wright CY, Kemp J, Williams R. Carbon footprints of universities: a comparative study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2011;12(4):333–346
Tilbury D. Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO; 2011
OECD. Measuring the effectiveness of environmental policy. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2021
IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report: Mitigation of Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2022
SENER. National Electric Mobility Program 2022-2030. Ministry of Energy, Government of Mexico; 2022
IFC. EDGE Buildings Certification System [Internet]. International Finance Corporation; 2021. Available from: https://edgebuildings.com/
Molina-García A, Rodríguez M, Torres L. University digitalization and sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainability. 2022;4(2):112-130
Benjamín JA, Masera O. Carbon Capture in the face of climate Change. Wood and Forests. 2001;7(1):3-12
Sovacool BK, Griffiths S, Kim J. Climate Change and academic flying: a call for institutional action. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;278:123-514
Ren J, Liang H, Dong L, Gao Z. Carbon emission reduction scenarios modeling for universities using AI-based approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;275:123113
Crippa M, Guizzardi D, Muntean M, SCFaaf E, Solazzo E. CO2 emissions of all world countries – 2023 report [Internet]. European Commission, Joint Research Centre; 2023. Available from: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2023

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Sustainability Perspectives provides immediate open acess to its published articles, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. As such, everyone is free to read, download, print, copy, search, upload to a social network or institutional repository, crawl for indexing, link to the full text, transform, pass as data into software, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, without requiring prior permission from either the athor(s) or the journal, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and the Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.

Authors, themselves, are not beholden to these requirments, as they retain the copyright of articles, without restrictions, merely granting the journal a non-exclusive lincese to publish their article and identify itself as its original publisher. However, by submitting to the Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, authors recignize and assent to the rights of readers, in accordance with the CC BY-SA lincense.

Editorial Office

Universitas Diponegoro

Jl Prof Sudharto SH, Tembalang, Semarang Indonesia 50275

Email : jsp@live.undip.ac.id

Theme Copyright by Universitas Diponegoro. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS and Mason Publishing OJS theme.