DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2025.25868

Multi Criteria Decision Making for the Preparation of Sustainability Indicators for the Printing Sector Industry

*Febrina Agusti scopus  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Duta Bangsa University, Jl. Ki Mangun Sarkoro No.20, Nusukan, Kec. Banjarsari, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57135 | Universitas Duta Bangsa |, Indonesia
Ringgo Ismoyo Buwono  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Duta Bangsa University, Jl. Ki Mangun Sarkoro No.20, Nusukan, Kec. Banjarsari, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57135 | Universitas Duta Bangsa |, Indonesia
Fertilio Dwyanton  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Duta Bangsa University, Jl. Ki Mangun Sarkoro No.20, Nusukan, Kec. Banjarsari, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57135 | Universitas Duta Bangsa |, Indonesia
Adit Tri Wahyono  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Duta Bangsa University, Jl. Ki Mangun Sarkoro No.20, Nusukan, Kec. Banjarsari, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57135 | Universitas Duta Bangsa |, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Febrina Agusti, Ringgo Ismoyo Buwono, Fertilio Dwyanton, Adit Tri Wahyono
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The government encourages industry players to continue to innovate and be sustainable in accordance with the commitment of the Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia. Industrial sustainability itself requires careful planning such as indicators and strategy formulation. Currently, the large number of industries in various sectors has given rise to fierce competition. The printing industry sector was an industry with significant development of 10 percent since 2019-2024. The purpose of this study was to develop indicators of industrial sustainability that were implemented in the printing sector in Surakarta City. The methods used were the Delphi Method and the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Method. The respondents of this study were PT Margo Mitro Joyo and PT Putra Nugraha Sentosa. The results of the study can produce 22 indicators of industrial sustainability, while also determining the level of sustainability of the printing sector industry in Surakarta in the good category.
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Articles
Language : EN
  1. Purwaningsih R, Agusti, F, Nugroho WPS, Susanty A, Purwanggono B. Assessment sustainable tourism: A literature review composite indicator. In: The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020); 2020
  2. Purwaningsih R, Ameliafidhoh Z, Susanty A, Pramono SNW, Agusti F. Sustainability Status Assessment of The Borobudur Temple using The Rap-Tourism with Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) Approach. In: International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2021); 2021
  3. Tsvetkova D, Bengtsson E, Durst S. Maintaining sustainable practices in SMEs: Insights from Sweden. Sustainability. Switzerland. 2020;12(24):1-26
  4. Chen D, Thiede S, Schudeleit T, Herrmann C. A holistic and rapid sustainability assessment tool for manufacturing SMEs. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 2014;63(1):437-440
  5. Jayasundara J, Rajapakshe P, Prasanna R, Gamage SKN, Ekanayake E, Abeyrathne G. The Nature of Sustainability Challenge in Small and Medium Enterprises and its Management. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Rajarata University, Sri Lanka, 2019
  6. Bayraktar M, Algan N. The Importance Of SMEs On World Economies. International Conference on Eurasian Economies 500. Eurasia. 2019
  7. Agusti F, Saputro FW, Utami IW, Dwyanto F. Multi-criteria decision making for SMEs sustainability assessment. Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology. Indonesia. 2022
  9. Schaper MT. The Missing (Small) Businesses of Southeast Asia. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective. 2020;79(79):1-11
  10. Pratama A. Smes-backbone-southeast-asias-growing-economy [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/contributing-global-economy/discussion/smes-backbone-southeast-asias-growing-economy
  11. Challenge T. Strengthening Regional Structures for Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion in ASEAN [Internet]; 2022. Available from: https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz-2022-en-asean.pdf
  12. Chen D, Schudeleit T, Posselt G, Thiede S. A state-of-the-art review and evaluation of tools for factory sustainability assessment. In: 2nd CIRP Global Web Conference. Sweden; 2013
  13. Henriques R, Figueiredo F, Nunes J. Product Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy: A Updated Review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;15(15)1-24
  14. KompasIndo. Percetakan Indonesia Tumbuh Pesat, Surabaya Printing Expo 2024 Siap Gelar [Internet]; 2024. Available from: https://kompasindo.co.id/2024/07/industri-percetakan-indonesia-tumbuh-pesat-surabaya-printing-expo-2024-siap-digelar/
  15. Ainul ALH, Ali NAM, Anwar R. Indonesian Printing Industry Profile. In: International Virtual Colloquium on Multi-disciplinary Research Impact (2nd Series). Malaysia; 2021
  16. Agusti F, Mahfudz MS, Risqi FT, Dewi KK. Modifikasi Assessment Tools Readiness Industry 4.0 Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri. 2023;18(1):72-78
  17. Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Kumar V. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2021;14(3):202-225
  18. Wang C, Ghadimi P, Lim MK, Tseng ML. A Literature Review of Sustainable Consumption and Production: A Comparative Analysis in Developed and Developing Economies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;206(1):741-754
  19. Gupta S, Dangayach GS, Singh AK. Key Determinants of Sustainable Product Design and Manufacturing. In: 12th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing; 2015. p. 99-102
  20. Bhamra T, Hernandez RJ, Rapitsenyane Y, Trimingham R. Product Service Systems: A Sustainable Design Strategy for SMEs in the Textiles and Leather Sectors. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. 2018;4(3):229-248
  21. Ziout A, Azab A, Altarazi S, Elmaraghy WH. Multi-criteria decision support for sustainability assessment of manufacturing system reuse. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2013;6(1):59-69
  22. Purwaningsih R, Susanto N, Yudha MC. Penilaian Keberlanjutan UKM Batik Kota Semarang dengan Metode Product Service System (PSS). Jurnal Teknik Industri. 2016;18(1):31-42
  23. Batalhao ACDS, Teixeira D, Godoi ELD. The Barometer of Sustainability as a Monitoring Tool of the Sustainable Development Process in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering A. 2017;6(3):120-126
  24. Bonnet J, Coll-Martinez E, Renou-maissant P. Evaluating sustainable development by composite index: Evidence from french departments. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(2):1-23
  25. Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Kumar V. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2021;14(3):202-225
  26. Batalhao ACDS, Teixeira D, Godoi ELD. The Barometer of Sustainability as a Monitoring Tool of the Sustainable Development Process in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering A. 2017;6(3):120-126
  27. Bonnet J, Coll-Martinez E, Renou-maissant P. Evaluating sustainable development by composite index: Evidence from french departments. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(2):1-23
  28. Mapar M, Jafari MJ, Mansouri N, Arjmandi R, Azizinezhad R, Ramos TB. A composite index for sustainability assessment of health, safety and environmental performance in municipalities of megacities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020;60:102164
  29. Dang D, Lyu X, Li X, Liu S, Dou H, Wang M, et al. Changing of the coordination of socioeconomic development and the environment as sustainable development progresses. Geography and Sustainability. 2024;6(3):1-30
  30. Solikah AAB. Systematic Literature Review : Kajian Potensi. JEBT: Jurnal Energi Baru & Terbarukan. 2024;5(1):27-43
  31. Ali M, Windarta J. Pemanfaatan Energi Matahari Sebagai Energi Bersih yang Ramah Lingkungan. JEBT: Jurnal Energi Baru & Terbarukan. 2024;1(3):68-77
  32. Sedijani P, Erniati MN, Hermana SY. Penanaman Seribu Pohon Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Banjir dan Tanah Longsor di Desa Eyat Mayang, Lembar, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA. 2022;5(2):335-340
  33. Fajarianingtyas D, Puniman A, Safitri HRFA. Penanaman pohon sebagai upaya menumbuhkan ecoliteracy berbasis education for sustainable development goals. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri). 2024;8(2):2267-2276
  35. Feronika ES, Silva KR, Raharjo ST, Resnawaty R. Tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan bidang lingkungan. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. 2020;7(1):1-11
  36. Nurwahyudi MRM. Pengaruh gender wanita dalam dewan direksi terhadap kinerja keuangan studi pada perusahaan yang masuk index kompas 100 tahun 2014-2015. Jurnal STIE Semarang (Edisi Elektronik). 2020;12(2):106-127
  37. Fitriasyach KP, Putri SI, Afififatusholihah L. Peran Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Pada Pemasok Di PT. Krakatau Pipe Industries. Jurnal manajemen dan Bisnis. 2024;4(2):141-149
  38. Indarwati T. Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan pada Pemilihan Supplier : A Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian dan Aplikasi Sistem & Teknik Industri (PASTI). 2020;15(3):268-281
  39. Damayanti DPO, Simangunsong F. Perlindungan hukum dalam kasus kekerasan dan perbudakan manusia. Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance. 2022;2(3):624-633
  40. Syifa S, Nurhasanah N. Penilaian Kinerja Pemasok Menggunakan Metode Vendor Performance Indicator dan Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Sains Dan Teknologi. 2023;8(3):186-198
  41. Waruwu M. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi. 2024;9(2):1220-1230

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.