DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.9.2.124-142

STUDI DESKRIPTIF – EVALUATIF BENTUK TIPOLOGI KAWASAN (PEMBELAJARAN DARI KOTA SURABAYA)

*R Dimas Widya Putra  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan (SAPPK), Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
RM. Petrus Natalivan Indradjati  -  Kelompok Keahlian Perencanaan dan Perancangan Kota, Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

Kota berkembang secara dinamis, fenomena transformasi kota dipengaruhi oleh faktor yang tidak mungkin dihindari, antara lain urbanisasi, perluasan skala pelayanan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi. Adanya urbanisasi dan fungsi pelayanan menjadi penyebab munculnya berbagai jenis tipologi pembangunan kawasan di kota, antara lain: perkampungan, kawasan urban fringe, CBD dan kota baru. Kota Surabaya merupakan kota dengan berbagai bentuk tipologi kawasan, karena itu fenomena bentuk tipologi yang ada di Kota Surabaya menjadi sesuatu yang penting untuk diteliti. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi berbagai tipologi pembangunan di Surabaya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif evaluatif yang dilanjutkan dengan teknik kualitatif. Analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pembacaan karakter yang di evaluasi berdasarkan pemahaman teori. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Kota Surabaya memiliki beberapa bentuk tipologi pembangunan kawasan, yaitu: CBD, kota baru dan kampung, urban fringe. Penyebab munculnya berbagai bentuk tipologi ini adalah pertumbuhan penduduk, skala pelayanan dan ekonomi.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Bentuk Tipologi; Kota Surabaya; Transformasi Perkotaan

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : ID
  1. Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2020). Urban Form Elements and Urban Potentiality (Literature Review). Journal of Engineering, 26(9), 65-82. Doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2020.09.05
  2. Barke, M. (2018). The Importance of Urban Form as an Object of Study Teaching Urban Morphology (pp. 11-30): Springer
  3. Barrington-Leigh, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2020). Global Trends Toward Urban Street-Network Sprawl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(4), 1941-1950. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905232116
  4. Beirão, J. N., Chaszar, A., & Čavić, L. (2015). Analysis and Classification of Public Spaces Using Convex and Solid-Void Models Future City Architecture for Optimal Living (Vol. 102, pp. 241-270): Springer
  5. Burgess, E. W. (2011). “The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project”: from Robert E. Park, Ernest W. Burgess, and Roderick D. McKenzie, The City (1925) The City Reader (pp. 207-215): Routledge
  6. Burton, E. (2000). The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis. Urban studies, 37(11), 1969-2006. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184
  7. Cavic, L., Šileryte, R., & Beirão, J. (2017). 3d-Informed Convex Spaces: The Automated Generation of Convex Representation for Open Public Space Analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Georrecursos, Portugal
  8. Chan, S. H., Donner, R. V., & Lämmer, S. (2011). Urban Road Networks—Spatial Networks With Universal Geometric Features? The European Physical Journal B, 84(4), 563-577. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-10889-3
  9. Chen, F. (2014). Urban Morphology and Citizens' Life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Netherlands: Springer
  10. Chen, T., Hui, E. C., Wu, J., Lang, W., & Li, X. (2019). Identifying Urban Spatial Structure and Urban Vibrancy In Highly Dense Cities Using Georeferenced Social Media Data. Habitat International, 89, 102005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102005
  11. Chen, W., Wu, A. N., & Biljecki, F. (2021). Classification of Urban Morphology with Deep Learning: Application on Urban Vitality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101706
  12. Chua, H. L., Lee, S. H., & Fulmer, G. W. (2017). Action Research on The Effect of Descriptive and Evaluative Feedback Order on Student Learning in A Specialized Mathematics and Science Secondary School. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(1), 1-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0015-y
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed): Sage publications
  14. Damayanti, R. (2015). Extending Kevin Lynch's Theory of Imageability; Through an Investigation of kampungs in Surabaya-Indonesia. (Doctoral), University of Sheffield
  15. Damayanti, R., & Kossak, F. (2016). Examining Spatial Identity of Kampungs Through Young Adults’ Perception in Surabaya–Indonesia. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(1), 18-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1150222
  16. Darjosanjoto, E. T. S. B. (2005). Kembang Jepun: Jalan Dominan Kota Surabaya. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 33(2)
  17. Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Raman, S., J, S. P. M., Bramley, C. J., & Gabe, R. T. (2008). Sustainable City Form (M. Jenks & C. Jones (eds.); Vol. 2): Springer Netherlands
  18. Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Raman, S., Porta, S., Jenks, M., Jones, C., & Bramley, G. (2010). Elements of Urban Form Dimensions of the Sustainable City (Vol. 2, pp. 21-51): Springer
  19. Dharmayana, I. W., & Herawati, A. A. (2021). Descriptive Evaluative Study on the Implementation of Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Courses of Guidance and Counseling Profession. Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020)
  20. Ding, W. (2013). Urban Design Needs Urban Morphology: A Practitioner's Viewpoint. Urban Morphology, 17(2), 120-123
  21. Fikriyah, S. (2013). Perkembangan Kawasan Realestate di Surabaya Barat Tahun 1970-2000 (Kontribusi Citraland dalam Perkembangan Kawasan Realestate di Surabaya Barat). Avatara, 1(3)
  22. Giyarsih, S. R. (2015). Gejala Urban Sprawl Sebagai Pemicu Proses Densifikasi Permukiman di Daerah Pinggiran Kota (Urban Fringe Area). Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 12(1), 40-45
  23. Han, B., Sun, D., Yu, X., Song, W., & Ding, L. (2020). Classification of Urban Street Networks Based on Tree-Like Network Features. Sustainability, 12(2), 628. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020628
  24. Hebbert, M. (2016). Figure-Ground: History and Practice of A Planning Technique. Town Planning Review, 87(6), 705-728. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.44
  25. Hellman, J. (2015). Living With Floods and Coping With Vulnerability. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(4), 468-483. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2014-0061
  26. Idawati, D. E. (2015). A Case of Urban Mimicry: Citra Raya, The Singapore of Surabaya. Journal of Architecture & Environment, 14(1), 19-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v14i1.a884
  27. Indahri, Y. (2017). Tantangan Pengelolaan Penduduk di Kota Surabaya. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial, 8(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.46807/aspirasi.v8i1.1251
  28. Kantun, S. (2017). Penelitian Evaluatif Sebagai Salah Satu Model Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan (Suatu Kajian Konseptual). JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial, 10(2), 15
  29. Kurniadi, I. (2007). Pola Spasial Urban Compaction di Wilayah Metropolitan Bandung. (Tugas Akhir ), Departemen Teknik Planologi-ITB, Bandung
  30. Kwanda, T. (2000). Penerapan Konsep Perencanaan dan Pola Jalan Dalam Perencanaan Realestat 1 di Surabaya. Dimensi : Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 28(2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.28.2.%25p
  31. Maharani, L. A., & Umilia, E. (2014). Tipologi Permukiman Kumuh di Pinggiran Selatan Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 3(2), C102-C106
  32. Morlok, E. K. (1991). Pengantar Teknik dan Perencanaan Transportasi. Jakarta: Erlangga
  33. Moudon, V. (1994). Getting to Know The Built Landscape: Typomorphology: Van Nostrand Reinhold
  34. Navastara, A., & Mandasari, V. (2019). Sustainable pedestrian ways in Central Business District of Tunjungan Surabaya: Can principles of new urbanism be applied? Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
  35. Neuman, M. (2005). The Compact City Fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
  36. Nuffida, N. E. (2012). Tipogenesis Struktur Ruang Kota Nusantara: Kajian dan Definisi dengan Referensi Studi Kota Surabaya 1870-2010 berdasarkan Pergerakan Aktivitas Sosial-Ekonomi Warga Kota. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Semesta Arsitektur Nusantara-1 (SAN-1)
  37. O'Sullivan, A. (2011). Urban Economics: McGraw-Hill Education
  38. Ostad-Ali, F., Behzadi, M. H., & Shahvarani, A. (2015). Descriptive Qualitative Method of Evaluation from The Viewpoint of Math Teachers and Its Comparison With The Quantitative Evaluation (Giving Scores) Method (A Case Study on The Primary Schools For Girls in Zone 1 of Tehran City). Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1, 50-56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5899/2015/metr-00078
  39. Peters, R. (2013). Surabaya, 1945-2010: Neighbourhood, State And Economy in Indonesia's City of Struggle: NUS Press Pte Ltd
  40. Putra, D. R., & Pradoto, W. (2016). Pola dan Faktor Perkembangan Pemanfaatan Lahan di Kecamatan Maranggen, Kabupaten Demak. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 4(1), 66-74. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/jpk.4.1.66-74
  41. Putra, R. D. W. (2017). Kajian Place Attachment di Kampung Pecinan Tambak Bayan Tengah, Kota Surabaya. Region: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 7(1), 19-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v7i1.5780
  42. Putri, M. A., Rahayu, M. J., & Putri, R. A. (2016). Bentuk Morfologi Kawasan Permukiman Urban Fringe Selatan Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 4(2), 120-128. Doi: 10.14710/jpk.4.2.120-128
  43. Rahmadaniyati, D., Widyasari, A., Kisnarini, R., & Sumartinah, H. (2017). The Inner-City Kampung Development Concept As Sustainable Tourism Area in Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 6(01), 114-119
  44. Rifaat, S. M., Tay, R., & de Barros, A. (2012). Urban Street Pattern and Pedestrian Traffic Safety. Journal of urban design, 17(3), 337-352. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.683398
  45. Rolalisasi, A., Happy, S., & Ispurwono, S. (2013). Social Capital of Urban Settlement. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.11
  46. Sadikin, A. (2009). Konsep Penataan Spasial Pelayanan Pendidikan Untuk Jenjang SMP di Surabaya Berdasarkan Indikator Kota kompak., Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  47. Sanders, P. (2013). Towards Consonance in Urban Form. Urban Morphology, 17(2), 116-118
  48. Sanders, P., & Baker, D. (2016). Applying Urban Morphology Theory to Design Practice. Journal of urban design, 21(2), 213-233. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1133228
  49. Saner, M. (2014). A Philosophy of Void: Ankara Hippodrome and After. Published Doctorate's thesis, Faculty of Architecture. Middle East Technical University. Ankara
  50. Santosa, H. (2008). Linking Open Building and Sustainable Livelihoods in The Kampung–Informal Settlement. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Joint Conference of CIB W
  51. Santoso, L. S. (2017). Etnografi Warung Kopi: Politik Identitas Cangkrukan di Kota Surabaya dan Sidoarjo. Mozaik Humaniora, 17(1), 113. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v17i1.6594
  52. Sasongko, R. N. (2018). The Implementation of National Standards of Education for School Quality Improvement Facing The 21st Century (Descriptive Evaluative Studies in Various Levels of Schools in Bengkulu Province of Indonesia). International Journal of Current Research in Life Sciences, 7(08), 2647-2651
  53. Schirmer, P. M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). A Multiscale Classification of Urban Morphology. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(1), 101-130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.667
  54. Setijanti, P., Santosa, H., Krisdiiato, J., Salatoen, M., Firmaningtyas, S., Ernawati, R., & Bahari. (2016). Creating Built Environments of New Opportunities. Paper presented at the The CIB World Building Congress
  55. Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2018). Resilient Urban Form: A Conceptual Framework Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning (pp. 167-179): Springer
  56. Shirleyana, S., Hawken, S., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2018). City of Kampung: Risk and Resilience in The Urban Communities of Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 543-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0025
  57. Silas, J. (1988). The Kampungs of Surabaya: Institute of Human Settlements, Agency for Research and Development, Ministry of Public Works & Japan International Cooperation Agency
  58. Silas, J., & Ernawati, R. (2013). Liveability of Settlements by People in the Kampung of Surabaya. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress: Construction and Society, QUT, Brisbane
  59. Sistyaningsih, I. N., & Kisnarini, R. (2017). Kampung Vertikal Kawasan Central Business District di Surabaya. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni Its, 6(2), G109-G112. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v6i2.25805
  60. Southworth, M., & Ben-Joseph, E. (2013). Streets and the Shaping of Towns and Cities: Island Press
  61. Tallo, A. J., Pratiwi, Y., & Astutik, I. (2014). Identifikasi Pola Morfologi Kota (Studi Kasus: Sebagian Kecamatan Klojen, di Kota Malang). Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 25(3), 213-227. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2015.25.3.3
  62. Trancik, R. (1991). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design: John Wiley & Sons
  63. Wei, R., Song, D., Wong, N. H., & Martin, M. (2016). Impact of Urban Morphology Parameters on Microclimate. Procedia Engineering, 169, 142-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.017
  64. Whitehand, J., Samuels, I., & Conzen, M. P. (2009). Conzen, MRG 1960: Alnwick, Northumberland: a Study in Town-Plan Analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27. London: George Philip. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 859-864. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509334948
  65. Yaguang, S. (2011). Development and Characteristics of Central Business District Under The Philosophy of Health. Procedia Engineering, 21, 258-266. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2013
  66. Yu, W., Ai, T., & Shao, S. (2015). The Analysis and Delimitation of Central Business District Using Network Kernel Density Estimation. Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 32-47. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.008
  67. Zahnd, M. (1999). Perancangan Kota Secara Terpadu: Kanisius
  68. Zia, M. M., & Rho, J. H. (2014). The Compact City Concept in Creating Resilient City and Transportation Systme in Surabaya. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135, 41-49. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.323
  69. Živković, J. (2019). Urban Form and Function. In W. Leal Filho, U. Azeiteiro, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar & T. Wall (Eds.), Climate Action (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer International Publishing
  70. Zulfiyah, I. (2017). Masyarakat Miskin Urban di Stren Kali Barata Jaya Surabaya. Paradigma, 5(3), 1-6

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.