DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.7.1.34-45

FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING URBAN ENERGY SECURITY : CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE

*Yudha Prambudia  -  Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
Arief Rahmana  -  Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
Anita Juraida  -  Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

The ever increasing urban energy consumption has always been an important issue of urban energy security. Citizen plays critical role in shaping the energy consumption. Therefore, citizen perspective can give significant impact to urban energy security evaluation. This research aims to provide a systematic framework to measure urban energy security taking into account the perspective of citizen and showcase its implementation in a case of Bandung city. The proposed framework is a straight five stages process as follow; (1) establishing the urban context, (2) defining energy security relevant to the context, (3), determining dimensions of energy security , (4) determining indicators and and metrics, and (5) the final stage is calculating energy security. The implementation case shows Bandung’s energy security is at Middle Low status. It also verify that the framework is operationally viable and it can capture the significance of citizen perspective.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Bandung; Citizen; Energy Security; Measurement Framework ; Urban

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : EN
  1. Almeida, P, F.; Athayde, S.; Mossa, J.; Bohlman, S.; Leite, F.; Oliver-Smith, A. How much is enough? An integrated examination of energy security, economic growth and climate change related to hydropower expansion in Brazil. 2016. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, pp.1132-1136
  2. Andreas, L.; Moslener, U.; Rübbelke, D.T.G. 2010. Indicators of energy security in industrialised countries. Energy Policy, 38(4), pp.1665-1671
  3. Ang, B..; Choong, W.; Ng, T. 2015.Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, pp.1077-1093
  4. Asia Pasific Energy Research Centre (APERC). 2007. A Quest For Energy Security In The 21ST Century. Japan. APERC
  5. Bandung Government. Jumlah Penduduk Kota Bandung Menurut Kecamatan. 2017. Retrieved from: http://data.bandung.go.id/dataset/jumlah-penduduk-kota-bandung-menurut-kecamatan-dan-jumlah-kelurahan/resource/41312063-eac9-4788-a63d-45ad52a8d784
  6. Chen, S.; Chen, B. 2015. Urban energy consumption: Different insights from energy flow analysis, input–output analysis and ecological network analysis. Applied Energy, 138, pp.99-107
  7. Chester, L. 2010. Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit Its Polysemic Nature. Energy Policy, 38(2): 887-95
  8. Cherp, A.; Jewell, J. 2014. The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, pp.415-421
  9. Cherp, A. 2012. Defining energy security takes more than asking around. Energy Policy, 48, pp.841-842
  10. Ekajati, E., S.; Hardjasaputra, S.; Mardiana, L. 1985. Sejarah Kota Bandung, 1945-1979. Bandung, Indonesia: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional, Proyek Inventarisasi dan Dokumentasi Sejarah Nasional
  11. Fang, D.; Shi, S.; Yu, Q. 2018. Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Security and an Empirical Analysis of China. Sustainability, 10(5), p.1685
  12. Greene, David L. 2010. Measuring energy security: Can the United States achieve oil independence?. Energy Policy, 38(4), pp. 1614-1621
  13. Gupta, E. 2008. Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries. Energy Policy, 36, pp.1195-1211
  14. Hoornweg, D.; Fleire, M.; Lee, M.J.; Tata, P.B.; Yuen, B. 2011. Cities and Climate Change:Responding to an Urgent Agenda. Washington, United States. World Bank Publications
  15. Hu, Z.; Ge, Y. 2014. The Geopolitical Energy Security Evaluation Method and a China Case Application Based on Politics of Scale. Sustainability, 6(9), pp.5682-5696
  16. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2011. World Energy Look. Retrieved from: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2013.pdf
  17. Jääskeläinen, J.; Höysniemi, S.; Syri, S.; Tynkkynen, V. 2018. Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat?. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3445
  18. Jewell, J.; Cherp, A.; Vinichenko, V.; Bauer, N.; Kober, T.; Mccollum, D.; Van Vuuren, D.; Van Der Zwaan, B. 2013. Energy Security Of China, India, The E.U. And The U.S. Under Long-Term Scenarios: Results From Six IAMs. Climate Change Economics, 04(04), p.1340011
  19. Kanchana, K.; Unesaki, H. 2015. Assessing Energy Security Using Indicator-Based Analysis: The Case of ASEAN Member Countries. Social Sciences, 4(4), pp.1269-1315
  20. Kharlamova, G.; Stavytskyy, A.; Chernyak, O. 2018. Analysis of Energy Security Provision in the European Countries. Innovative Business Development—A Global Perspective, pp. 111-131
  21. Kruyt, B.; Vuuren, D, P.; Vries, H, J, M.; Groenenberg, H. 2009. Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37(6), pp.2166-2181
  22. Kumar, S. 2016. Assessment of renewables for energy security and carbon mitigation in Southeast Asia: The case of Indonesia and Thailand. Applied Energy, 163, pp.63-70
  23. Lisin, E., Strielkowski, W., Chernova, V. and Fomina, A. 2018. Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration. Energies, 11(12), p.3284
  24. Martchamadol, J.; Kumar, S. Thailands energy security indicators. 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), pp.6103-6122
  25. Narula, K.; Reddy, B. A SES (sustainable energy security) index for developing countries. 2016. Energy, 94, pp.326-343
  26. Prambudia, Y.; Nakano, M. 2012. Integrated Simulation Model for Energy Security Evaluation. Energies, 5(12), pp.5086-5110
  27. Prambudia, Y.; Nakano, M. 2012. Exploring Malaysia’s Transformation to Net Oil Importer and Oil Import Dependence. Energies, 5(8), pp.2989-3018
  28. Radovanović, M.; Filipović, S.; Pavlović, D. 2017. Energy security measurement – A sustainable approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, pp.1020-1032
  29. Saaty, T. and Vargas, L. 2001. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  30. Sovacool, B.; Saunders, H. 2014. Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security. Energy, 67, pp.641-651
  31. Statistics of Bandung Municipality. 2017. Bandung Dalam Angka. Bandung, Indonesia: Statistics of Bandung Municipality
  32. Vivoda, V. 2010. Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach. Energy Policy, 38(9), pp.5258-5263
  33. Von, H.D.; Suzuki, T.; Williams, J.; Savage, T.; Hayes, P. 2011. Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia. Energy Policy, 39(11), pp.6719-6730
  34. Watson, J.; Scott, A. 2009. New nuclear power in the UK: A strategy for energy security?. Energy Policy, 37(12), pp.5094-5104
  35. Wijaya, M.; Tezuka, T. 2013. A comparative study of households' electricity consumption characteristics in Indonesia: A techno-socioeconomic analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(6), pp.596-604
  36. Winzer, C. 2012. Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy, 46, pp.36-48
  37. Yang, J.; Chen, B. 2013. Measuring energy security—An urban perspective. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 1(2), pp.119-128
  38. Yao, L.; Youngho, C. 2014. Energy security in China: A quantitative analysis and policy implications. Energy Policy, 67, pp.595-604
  39. Yergin, D. 2006 Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), p.69

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.