DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.14.1.84-96

RECLAIMING THE CITY: RETHINKING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN SURAKARTA’S PUBLIC SPACE DEVELOPMENT

*Andi Setiawan orcid  -  Faculty of Fine Art and Design, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Pandu Purwandaru  -  Faculty of Fine Art and Design, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Setiawan

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study critically examines citizen participation in public space development in Surakarta, Indonesia, a city that has undergone rapid transformation driven by city branding, beautification projects, and cultural events. While official documents such as the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) 2021-2026 and 2025–2029 promote an inclusive and collaborative vision, this research finds that participatory practices remain largely symbolic. Using a qualitative approach, the study draws on semi-structured interviews with a cultural expert, an academic, and a creative economy practitioner, combined with document analysis. Thematic findings reveal that public participation in Surakarta remains constrained by top-down governance, tokenistic consultation, and the dominance of the city-branding agenda.  While civic engagement is acknowledged in policy discourse, practical implementation continues to prioritize visibility, efficiency, and investment attraction over inclusivity. The study concludes that achieving genuine co-creation in urban development requires stronger institutional mechanisms, transparent decision-making, and design practices that recognize citizens as co-designer of the city. 

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Citizen Participation; City Branding; Public Space; Surakarta; Urban Governance
Funding: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Ref Number:1297/UN27.22/PT.01.03/2025

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : EN
  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Arnstein, S. (2015). A ladder of citizen participation. In The city reader (pp. 323-336): Routledge
  3. Brand, P., & Davila, J. (2011). Aerial cable-car systems for public transport in low-income urban areas: lessons from Medellin, Colombia. doi: https://doi.org/10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii006
  4. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101-107. doi: 10.1080/13604810500092106
  5. Cameron, S. (1992). Housing, Gentrification and Urban Regeneration Policies. Urban Studies, 29(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1080/00420989220080011
  6. De Certeau, M. (2024). The practice of everyday life. Contesti. Città, territori, progetti, 2
  7. De Jesus, D. S. V., Kamlot, D., & Dubeux, V. J. C. (2020). A critique of the creative economy, creative city and creative class from the Global South. International Journal of Business Administration, 11(4), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v11n4p1
  8. Debord, G. (2020). The society of the spectacle: Zone Books
  9. Djufri. (2025). From Ritual Practice to Community Resilience: An Ethnographic Study on Local Cultural Strategies in Urban Makassar. Indonesian Journal of Social Development, 3(3), 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.47134/jsd.v3i1.4538
  10. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class: Routledge
  11. Greenberg, M. (2010). Branding, Crisis and Utopia – Representing New York in the Age of Bloomberg. In M. Aronczyc & D. Powers (Eds.), Blowing up the Brand: Critical Perspectives on Promotional Paradigms. New York & Oxford: Peter Lang
  12. Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3-17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
  13. Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
  14. Harvey, D. (2019). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution: Verso books
  15. Healey, P. (2020). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies: Bloomsbury Publishing
  16. Hove, J., D’Ambruoso, L., Kahn, K., Witter, S., van der Merwe, M., Mabetha, D., . . . Twine, R. (2022). Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review. Global Health Action, 15(1), 2004730. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2004730
  17. Jánová, V., Herntrei, M., & Fialová, D. (2025). From aspirations of citizen power to the persistence of tokenism: a systematic review of citizen participation in destination governance. Frontiers in Sustainable Tourism, Volume 4 - 2025. doi: 10.3389/frsut.2025.1693707
  18. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes Toward Their Properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
  19. Kim, E. K. (2025). The Paradox of Inequality Mitigation through Citizen Participation: A Critical Analysis of the Intersection between Deliberative Democracy and Social Capital Theory. Center for Civic Politics Research, 10, 87-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.54968/civicpol.2025.10.87
  20. KrÄTke, S. (2010). ‘Creative Cities’ and the Rise of the Dealer Class: A Critique of Richard Florida's Approach to Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835-853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00939.x
  21. Lefebvre, H. (1992). The production of space: Wiley-Blackwell
  22. Lestari, F., Refranisa, R., & Wicaksono, R. (2022). Strategi Penataan Kampung Wisata Tepi Sungai. Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perencanaan (JUARA), 5(2), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v5i2.2292
  23. Lindell, J. (2013). The city as spectacle: a Debordian Critique of the city as commodity and brand. Paper presented at the Contested/Ordinary/Spectacular Media City Conference, 15th to 17th May 2013, Helsinki, Finland
  24. Makeham, P. (2005). Performing the City. Theatre Research International, 30(2), 150-160. doi: 10.1017/S030788330500115X
  25. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space: Guilford press
  26. Mukaromah, H. (2026). Inovasi Pembiayaan Kolaboratif dalam Penataan Permukiman Kumuh Bantaran Sungai di Kampung Mojo Surakarta. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 13(2), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.13.2
  27. Nieuwenhuijsen, M., de Nazelle, A., Pradas, M. C., Daher, C., Dzhambov, A. M., Echave, C., . . . Mueller, N. (2024). The Superblock model: A review of an innovative urban model for sustainability, liveability, health and well-being. Environmental Research, 251, 118550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118550
  28. No, W., & Hsueh, L. (2022). How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(3), 663-681. doi: 10.1177/0020852320943668
  29. Peraturan Daerah (Perda) Kota Surakarta Nomor 9 Tahun 2025 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Tahun 2025-2029
  30. Prakoso, W. (2026). Penataan kawasan Nonongan Solo dimulai Agustus, Jl Yos Sudarso jadi searah. Espos.id. Retrieved from https://solopos.espos.id/penataan-kawasan-nonongan-solo-dimulai-agustus-jl-yos-sudarso-jadi-searah-2238169
  31. Puspita. (2026). Rembug Kutho 2026 dorong sinergi perkuat branding Solo sebagai kota budaya modern. Mettanews.id. Retrieved from https://mettanews.id/rembug-kutho-2026-dorong-sinergi-perkuat-branding-solo-sebagai-kota-budaya-modern/
  32. Rahmansyah, D., Nursyifa, D., & Arzety, D. (2025). The Relationship between the State and Civil Society from the Perspective of Politica Humanitas, a Critical Study of Participatory Democracy. Journal of Politica Humanitatis, 1(2), 72-88
  33. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers: sage
  34. Setiawan, A. (2022). Desain partisipatif: Sebuah alternatif komodifikasi ruang kota. Prisma, 41(1), 3-15
  35. Sibanda, M. M., & Lues, L. (2021). Public participation power dynamics in strategic development planning in a metropolitan municipality: Eastern Cape Province. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 2(1), 44. doi: 10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.44
  36. Sukowati, R. T. (2022). Thematic Village Program: The Problems of Changing Urban Village Spaces into Tourist Destinations. JSPH (Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis), 7(1), 27-43
  37. Surya, M. (2023). Penataan koridor Gatsu-Ngarsopuro di Solo. ANTARA News. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/foto/3334218/penataan-koridor-gatsu-ngarsopuro-di-solo
  38. Thörn, C. (2006). Dressed for success”: Entrepreneurial cities, sports and public space [ESF-LiU Conference “Cities and Media: Cultural Perspectives on Urban Identities in a Mediatized World. Retrieved from https://ep.liu.se/ecp/020/007/ecp072007.pdf
  39. Vanolo, A. (2020). Cities are Not Products. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 111(1), 10-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12385
  40. Verloo, N. (2023). Ignoring people: The micro-politics of misrecognition in participatory governance. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(7), 1474-1491. doi: 10.1177/23996544231182985

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.