FILSAFAT ILMU TERKAIT DENGAN PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA (Studi kasus: Green Urban Open Space dan Quality of Life)
Abstract
Green urban open space becomes discourse in many cities, several cities in Indonesia have gained award because of their successful in building green urban open space, among them are: Surabaya and Bandung, the exsistence of green urban open space can be considered in improving city dwellers’s quality of life, quality of life connected field with urban and regional planning as part of comprehensive planning, science philosophy is a foundation to understand research positition. This research using qualitative descriptive to explore research position in urban and regional planning connected with knowledge philosophy. Analysis technique used in this research is descriptive evaluative using literature and theory. This paper concludes that green urban open space and quality of life are empirical research, logic, and can be measured. These concepts are parts of deductive research and reflection that the urban and regional planning is a logic knowledge and a science part.
Keywords
References
Bagir, H. (2005). Buku Saku Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Mizan.
Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is Scary, Disgusting, and Uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 443-467. doi:10.1177/001391659702900401
Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American psychologist, 31(2), 117.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public spaces. Urban spaces. The Dimension of Urban Design, 1, 46-47.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
Galloway, S., Bell, D., Hamilton, C., & Scullion, A. (2006). Well-being and Quality of Life: Measuring the Benefits of Culture and Sport-A Literature Review and Thinkpiece: Scottish Government.
Ginting, P., & Situmorang, S. H. (2008). Filsafat Ilmu dan Metode Riset. Medan: USU Press.
Grahn, P. (1985). Man’s Needs for Urban Parks, Greenery and Recreation. Alnarp: Institute for Landscape Planning, Swedish Agricultural University.
Grigg, N. S. (1988). Infrastructure Engineering and Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. .
Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Holmes, S. (2005). Assessing the quality of life—reality or impossible dream?: A discussion paper. International journal of nursing studies, 42(4), 493-501.
Jujun, S. S. (1999). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pusat Sinar Harapan.
Kattsoff, L. O., & Soemargono, S. (1992). Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Melbourne Parks. (1983). A Survey of the Use of Selected Sites. Melbourne: Ministry of Planning and Environment.
Mensah, C. A., Andres, L., Perera, U., & Roji, A. (2016). Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: A systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1).
Moleong, L. J. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhadjir, N. (1989). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Raka Sarasin.
Myers, D. (1988). Building Knowledge about Quality of Life for Urban Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 347-358. doi:10.1080/01944368808976495
Salim, A. (2001). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial: Buku Sumber Untuk Penelitian Kualitatif (edisi kedua, Agustus 2006). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Tafsir, A. (2004). Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Takwin, B., & Martiasa. (2001). Filsafat Timur: Sebuah Pengantar ke Pemikiran-pemikiran Timur. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Taylor, N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory Since 1945: Sage Publications.
Woolley, H. (2003). Urban Open Spaces. London & New York: Spon Press.
World Health Organization. (1997). Twenty Steps for Developing a Healthy Cities Project.Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0