DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.10.2.118-126

RIVER DEBRIS TRANSPORT PLANNING FROM SOURCE TO PUTRI CAMPO FINAL PROCESSING PLACE, SURAKARTA CITY

*Mega Mutiara Sari  -  Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
Takanobu Inoue  -  Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan
Regil Kentaurus Harryes  -  Faculty of Vocational Studies, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
Kuriko Yokota  -  Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan
Iva Yenis Septiariva  -  Study Program of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Sapta Suhardono  -  Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Shigeru Kato  -  Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan
Suprihanto Notodarmojo  -  Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Aninda Putri Nafisah  -  Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
I Wayan Koko Suryawan  -  Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

The waste from the river is one of the obstacles in managing the Bengawan Solo River, Surakarta City. River debris is usually collected in tributaries so as not to carry the pollutant load to the watershed, causing flooding, and then transported to the Final Processing Site (TPA). This study aims to analyze the waste transportation system from the source to the landfill. This research was conducted by direct observation and using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) for determination. Alternative waste transportation used are haul container system (HCS) and stationary container system (SCS). The criteria used are the number of ritations, price, ease of transportation, potential damage, maintenance, and type of container. Based on the weighting results on the MAUT analysis, transportation with the SCS method has a higher weight than the HCS method.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: River Debris; Transport; Surkarta City

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : EN
  1. Adam, A. I., Mangangka, I. R., & Riogilang, H. (2021). Optimalisasi Sistem Pengangkutan Sampah di Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado. TEKNO, 19(78), 103-114
  2. Akili, R., & Odey, G. (2021). The Janitor’s Knowledge and Attitude Towards Household Infectious Waste Countermeasure During Pandemic Covid-19 in Manado City. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(2), 525–529. doi: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210086
  3. Ambariski, P. P. D., & Herumurti, W. (2016). Sistem Pengangkutan Sampah Berdasarkan Kapasitas Kendaraan Pengangkut dan Kondisi Kontainer Sampah di Surabaya Barat. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 5(2), D64-D69. doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v5i2.16477
  4. Apaydin, O., & Gonullu, M. T. (2018). Route Optimization for Solid Waste Collection: Trabzon (Turkey) Case Study. Global NEST Journal, 9(1), 6–11. doi: 10.30955/gnj.000388
  5. Baptiste, A. J., Gravitiani, E., & Eric, N. (2021). River pollution and human health risks: Assessment in the locality areas proximity of Bengawan Solo river, Surakarta, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability, 5(1), 13-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.26554/ijems.2021.5.1.13-20
  6. Burhamtoro, B. (2016). Biaya Angkut Stationary Container System (SCS) pada Pengangkutan Sampah. Sentia, 8, 1–8
  7. Dhahir, D. F. (2020). Shaping and Maintaining Anti-Littering Behavior of The Community in Indonesia. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference of Interdisciplinary Research on Green Environmental Approach for Sustainable Development
  8. Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 Based Sustainable Circular Economy Approach for Smart Waste Management System to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263
  9. Kailiponi, P. (2010). Analyzing Evacuation Decisions Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Procedia Engineering, 3, 163-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.016
  10. Kartini, N. K. D. U., Zahra, N. L., Sarwono, A., Rahmalia, I., Nastiti, A. D., Septiariva, I. Y., & Suryawan, I. W. K. (2023). Multi-attribute Analysis of Raw Water Treatment from Deep Wells at PDAM Tirta Mahottama, Klungkung Regency. Paper presented at the The 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering, Bali, Indonesia
  11. Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-making. Amerika: Harvard University Press
  12. Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A Review of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Towards Sustainable Renewable Energy Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596–609. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
  13. Li, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Comprehensive Utilization and Environmental Risks Of Coal Gangue: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 117946. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946
  14. Mahmudah, R. A., & Herumurti, W. (2016). Analisis Sistem Pengangkutan Sampah di Wilayah Surabaya Utara. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 5(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v5i2.17118
  15. Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 3 of 2013 "Penyelenggaraan Prasarana dan Sarana Persampahan dalam Penanganan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga"
  16. Octavia, S. (2017). Analisis Risiko Manual Handling pada Pekerja Crumb Rubber PT. Bakrie Sumatera Plantations, Tbk Tahun 2016. (Skripsi), Universitas Sumatera Utara, Sumatera Utara
  17. Pergher, I., & Almeida, A. T. (2018). A Multi-Attribute, Rank-Dependent Utility Model for Selecting Dispatching Rules. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 46, 264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.007
  18. Pumpinyo, S., & Nitivattananon, V. (2014). Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand. Sustainability, 6(10). doi: 10.3390/su6107048
  19. Raman, N., & Sathiya Narayanan, D. (2008). Impact of Solid Waste Effect on Ground Water and Soil Quality Nearer to Pallavaram Solid Waste Landfill Site in Chennai. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 1(4), 828–836
  20. Sari, M., Inoue, T., Nafisah, A. P., Harryes, R. K., Yokota, K., Septiariva, I. Y., & Suryawan, I. (2022). Storage and Collection River Debris Planning in Tanggul River Surakarta City, Indonesia As Source of Waste
  21. Management Using The Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 10(5), 176-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v5i1.1160
  22. Satria, E., Atina, N., Simbolon, M. E., & Windarto, A. P. (2018). Spk: Algoritma Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) Pada Destinasi Tujuan Wisata Lokal di Kota Sidamanik. Computer Engineering, Science and System Journal, 3(2), 168. doi: 10.24114/cess.v3i2.9954
  23. Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Vaishya, R. C., & Gupta, R. D. (2007). Municipal Solid Waste Characteristics and Management in Allahabad, India. Waste Management, 27(4), 490-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.001
  24. SNI 19-2454-2002 "Tata Cara Teknik Operasional Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan"
  25. Suryawan, I. W. K., Rahman, A., Septiariva, I. Y., Suhardono, S., & Wijaya, I. M. W. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment of Solid Waste Generation During and Before Pandemic of Covid-19 in Bali Province. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16(1), 11–21. doi: 10.46754/jssm.2021.01.002
  26. Syahputri, K., Rahmi, M. S., Indah, R., Mangara, M. T., & Josua. (2019). Determination of Trash Hauling Routes Using Floyd Warshall Algorithm in Medan Barat District. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1230(1), 12051. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1230/1/012051
  27. Tchobanoglous, G., & Vigil, S. A. (1993). Integrated Solid Waste Managementengineering Principles and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill
  28. Zahra, N. L., Septiariva, I. Y., Sarwono, A., Qonitan, F. D., Sari, M. M., Gaina, P. C., . . . Suryawan, I. W. K. (2022). Substitution Garden and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Plastic Waste as Refused Derived Fuel (RDF). International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11(2), 523–532. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2022.44328

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.