skip to main content

The Implementation of AIDS Care Community (ACC) Work Program as an Efforts for Handling HIV / AIDS Cases in Poncol Community Health Center Work Area

1Department of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

2Department of health education and behavioral sciences, faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 1 Mar 2021; Published: 30 Dec 2021.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 The authors. Published by Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Introduction: Semarang City has the highest number of HIV / AIDS cases in Central Java. Several attempts to control HIV / AIDS cases, such as the organization for AIDS that is named after AIDS Care Community (ACC) in every village scope. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of the ACC program in Poncol Community Health Center.

Methods: This is a descriptive research, uses qualitative methods using in-depth interview for data collection techniques. There are 9 informants who are selected by using purposive sampling method. Data is analyzed using descriptive method. The process of data analysis begins with collecting data, and then reducing the data that has been generated. After that, the data are presented and concluded.

Results: The results show that the implementation of ACC program in the work area of Poncol Community Health Center is assisted by Poncol Puskesmas. There is 1 ACC out of 9 ACC that is actively implementing the ACC program while the others are not running well. It is found that low capacity of ACC members, lack of funds, low of support from the local government (village), low community support, inadequate facilities and infrastructure that affect the implementation of ACC programs. Therefore, the output is not achieved optimally.

Conclusions: The implementation of the of the ACC program in Poncol Community Health Center work area has not been running optimally. Support from all parties is needed, including from the members of the ACC, local government, AIDS commission, and the community in order to achieve the ACC goals.

 

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: AIDS Care Community; HIV/AIDS; village scope
Funding: Universitas Diponegoro

Article Metrics:

  1. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI. 2019. p. 181–5
  2. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Data 2018. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/unaids- data-2018_en.pdf,
  3. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2018. 2018;77
  4. Komisi Penanggulangan AIDS Kota Semarang. Kumulatif Kasus HIV Tahun 1995-2019 yang Ditemukan di Kota Semarang. 2019
  5. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Analisis Situasi HIV/AIDS di Kota Semarang Tahun 2019. 2019; Available from: http://repository.unmuhpnk.ac.id/294/1/JURNAL.pdf
  6. Bellatrix I, Nurcahyanto H, Marom A. Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang Nomot 4 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penanggulangan HIV dan AIDS. 2013;1–10
  7. Suharyanti Y. Laporan Penelitian Operasional Prosedur Pengobatan pada Layanan Komprehensif HIV-AIDS Berkesinambungan ( LKB) di Kota Yogyakarta dan Kota Semarang. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Teknik Industri Universitas Atma Jaya. 2015;1:1–64
  8. Puskesmas Poncol. Puskesmas Poncol Bagian Promosi Kesehatan. 2020
  9. Puskesmas Poncol. Bagian Pengendalian dan Penanganan HIV/AIDS. 2020;
  10. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penanggulangan HIV dan AIDS. Jakarta: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2013
  11. Meisari E. Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Guna Penanggulangan Pengangguran Kota Bandar Lampung dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. UIN Raden Intan Lampung. 2017;4
  12. Arianto G, N ZK. Analisis Pembiayaan Kesehatan Program Upaya Kesehatan Masyarakat di Indonesia Tahun 2013 & 2014. Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat. 2020;23(1):61–9. doi: 10.22435/hsr.v23i1.940
  13. Keperawatan J, Kesehatan D a N. Evaluasi Program Pemberian Makanan Tambahan (Pmt) Pada Balita Gizi Kurang Di Puskesmas Jakenan Kabupaten Pati. CENDEKIA UTAMA J Keperawatan dan Kesehat Masy STIKES Cendekia Utama Kudus. 2017;Vol. 6(Evaluasi PMT):81
  14. Rofiq A. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Keberhasilan Pengembangan Program Posyandu Lansia di Puskesmas Jagir Surabaya. Kebijak dan Manaj Publik. 2018;6(2):1-14
  15. Rifa’i HM, Fadhil M. Manajemen Organisasi. 2013
  16. Winarni S, Martiningsih W. Pemberdayaan Kelompok Warga Peduli Aids ( ACC ) Dalam Program Stop (Suluh, Temukan, Obati, Pertahankan). J Idaman. 2019;3(2):120–8
  17. Budiharto P, Larasati E, Suwitri S. Analisis Kebijakan Pengawasan Melekat Di Badan Pengawas Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Dialogue Can Philos Assoc. 2010;4(1):42–61
  18. Oktavia G, Purnaweni H, Rengga A. Evaluasi Output dan Outcome Pada Program Jaminan Kesehatan Masyarakat Kota (JAMKESMASKOT) di Kota Semarang. 2013;1–12
  19. Hasanbasri M. Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Perencanaan Program Daerah. Vol. 10, KMPK, UGM, Yogyakarta. 2007. p. 56–53
  20. Anggraini HG. Analisi Output dan Outcome Bidang Pendidikan. 2014;IX(1):70–82
  21. Eryanto H. Hubungan Antara Mutu Pelayanan Dengan Kesetiaan Pasien ( Survey Pada Pasien Bagian Jantung Rumah Sakit Internasional Bintaro ). Econosains J Online Ekon dan Pendidik. 2011;9(2):107–18

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.