- BUKU
- Alznauer, M. (2015). Hegel’s Theory of Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Ryngaert, C. (2015). Jurisdiction in International Law (Second edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Shaw, M. (2008). International Law – Sixth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Treves, T. (1990). Maritime Terrorism and International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- JURNAL
- Balkin, R. (2006). The International Maritime Organization and Maritime Security. Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol 30, pp. 20
- Djalal, H. (2004). Terorisme di Laut: Aspek Politik Internasional- Regional dan Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, Vol IX, (No.1), pp. 51
- Garmon, T. (2002). International Law of the Sea: reconciling the Law of Piracy and Terrorism in the Wake of September 11th.Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol. 257, pp. 27
- Ho, J. (2006). The Security of Sea Lanes in Southeast Asia. Journal Asian Survey, Vol 46, (No.4), pp 2
- Hong, Nong & Adolf K Y. (2010). The International Legal Indtruments in addressing Piracy and Maritime Terrorism: A Critical Review. Research in Transportation Economics Journal Elsevier, Vol 27, pp. 51-60
- Luft, Gal. & Korin, Anne. (2004). Terrorism Goes to Sea. Journal Foreign Affairs, Vol.83, (No.61), pp. 70
- Marcopoulos, A. (2008). Flags of Terror: An Argument for Rethinking Maritime Security Policy Regarding Flags of Convenience. Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol 32, pp. 294
- Mellor, J. (2002). Missing the Boat: The Legal and Practical Problems of the Prevention of Maritime Terrorism. American University International Law Review, Vol.341, (No.18), pp. 367
- Murphy, M. (2008). Small Boats, Weak States, Dirty, Money: Piracy and Maritime Terrorism in the Modern World. Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal, Vol. 27,(No.7), pp. 347
- Rothwell, D. (2009). Innocent Passage in the Territoral Sea: The Unclos Regime and Asia Pacific State Practice. Yale Journal of International,Vol.34,Issue 2, pp.331-387
- Sagena, W. (2013). Memahami Keamanan Tradisional dan Non-Tradisional di Selat Malaka Isu-isu dan Interaksi antar actor. Jurnal Interdependence, Vol 1, (No. 1), pp. 1
- Sittnick, T. (2005). State Responsibility and Maritime Terrorism in the Strait of Malacca: Persuading Indonesia and Malaysia to Take Additional Steps to Secure the Strait. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, Vol 14, pp. 88
- Unii, N. (2006). Protecting the Straits of Malacca and Singapore against Piracy and Terrorism. International Journal of Maritime and Coastal Law, Vol 21, pp. 12
- Wee, J. (2017). Maritime Terrorism Threat in Southeast Asia and its Challenges. Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, Vol 43, (No.2), pp 20
- Young, Adam J., & Valencia, Mark J. (2003). Conflation of Piracy and Terrorism in Southeast Asia: Rectitude and Utility. Contemporary Southeast Asia : A Journal of International and Strategic Affair, Vol. 25, (No. 2) pp. 269
- TESIS
- Santosa, G. (2014). Pembentukan Rezim Maritim untuk Mengatasi Ancaman Terorisme Maritim di Selat Malaka. Universitas Pertahanan
Last update:
No citation recorded.
Last update:
No citation recorded.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
The author has the right to the following:
- duplicate all or part of the published material for use by the author himself as a classroom instruction or verbal presentation material in various forums;
- reusing part or all of the material as a compilation material for author's work;
- make copies of published material to be distributed within the institute where the author works.
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Law Reform are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.