DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.108-127

Optimalisasi Pengelolaan Beban Kerja Hakim Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Integritas Dan Kualitas Peradilan

The Optimization of Judge Workload Management and Its Implications for Judicial Integrity and Quality

*Muliani Samiri orcid scopus publons  -  Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia
Muhammad Adil Kasim scopus  -  Pengadilan Negeri Slawi, Indonesia
Nurjannah Nonci scopus  -  Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia
Jamaluddin Ahmad orcid scopus  -  Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia
Muhammad Alif Adimulia Putra  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

High workload is a major challenge for the Indonesian legal system. Judges face a high number and level of complexity of cases, which leads to a decline in the quality of decisions and the integrity of the judiciary. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of excessive workload on the quality of legal decisions, assess the relationship between workload and judicial integrity, and identify factors that trigger ethical violations. The method used in this study is a normative legal approach, analyzing secondary data from court decisions, annual reports of the Supreme Court, and relevant legal literature. The findings of this study indicate that high workloads lead to fatigue, high stress levels, and limited time for judges to thoroughly consider cases, which in turn trigger ethical violations, conflicts of interest, and inconsistent rulings. In conclusion, optimizing the workload by increasing the number of judges, improving case management, and strengthening the oversight system are some recommendations that need to be prioritized in the implementation of the judicial system.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Workload; Judicial Integrity; Quality of Decisions

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Legal Philosophy as a Judge's Worldview in Handing Down Criminal Verdicts Legal Reconstruction of Environmental Protection and Human Rights in the Context of Climate Resilience A Critical Review of the Actualization of the Right to Control by the State Doctrine in the Policy on Revocation of Forest Area Permits/Concessions Formulation Policy and Prospective Law Enforcement of Medical Personnel/Health Personnel Negligence Acts (Dynamics of Criminal Responsibility in Medical Malpractice) More recent articles
  1. Samekto, F.X, Adji., & Natalis, Aga. (2024). Exploring the Grundnorm Dilemma: Can Pancasila be Considered the Grundnorm in the Context of ‘the Pure Theory of Law’?. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Vol.18,(No.48),pp.319-338. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2024.62978.3843
  2. Akbar, M. (2023). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Melahirkan Putusan Progresif. Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, Vol.17,(No1),pp.155–170. https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i1.1853
  3. Antasia, Pramudita., & Lewoleba, Kayus Kayowuan. (2023). Hakim Sebagai Penegak Etika Profesi Hukum : Suatu Kajian Tentang independensi dan integritas. Madani : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline, Vol.1,(No.11),pp.197–206. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10247603
  4. Arifin, Andi. (2023). Peran Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law Research, Vol.1, (No.1),pp.6-10. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i1.2
  5. Cahya, Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining., Nurhayati, Dwi Endah., & AN, Dodik Prihatin. (2017). Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan. Lentera Hukum, Vol.4, (No.2), pp.47-62. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4494
  6. Chendra, Jane Elizabeth Priscillia., Said, Nurfaidah., & Lahae, Kahar. (2020). Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perbuatan Hukum Atas Harta Bersama Pada Pembelian Dan Penjaminan Hak Atas Tanah. Mimbar Hukum,Vol.32,(No.2),pp.308–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.50865
  7. Dahoklory, Madaskolay Viktoris., & Wisnaeni, Fifiana. (2020). Binding Legal Force of Supreme Court Decision over General Election Commission. Law Reform, Vol.16, (No.1),pp.58-69. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30305
  8. Dinata, Kadek Indra Prayoga., & Kurniawan, I Gede Agus. (2024). Keabsahan Akta Relaas Yang Dibuat Dengan Video Conference Berbasis Cyber Notary (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi : Nomor 35 / Pdt / 2021 / PT KDI ). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,Vol.6,(No.3),pp.328-351. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i3.328-351
  9. Elmayanti, E. (2024). Peranan Hakim Dalam Melakukan Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Res Justisia; Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.4,(No.1),pp.238–252. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v4i1.116
  10. Gultom, Saddam Setia., & Sularto, RB. (2016). Ide Dasar Keseimbangan Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Sebagai Objek Praperadilan Oleh Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Law Reform, Vol.12, (No.1), pp.101-120, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v12i1.15844
  11. Hadisuprapto, P. (2006). Penataan Sistem Dan Kelembagaan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Anak. Law Reform, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.28-39, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v1i1.12179
  12. Hardianto, D. (2014). Hakim Konstitusi Adalah Hati Dalam Tubuh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.11, (No. 2),pp.315-32. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1126
  13. Harini, Mediana., & Rahmat, Diding. (2025). Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim. Journal Evidence of Law, Vol.4, (No.1),pp.207–230. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1097
  14. Haryadi, Lilik., & Suteki, Suteki. (2017). Implementasi Nilai Keadilan Sosial Oleh Hakim Dalam Perkara Lanjar Sriyanto Dari Perspektif Pancasila Dan Kode Etik Profesi Hakim. Law Reform, Vol.13, (No.2),pp.164-179, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i2.16153
  15. Indramayu, Indramayu., Jayus, Jayus., & Indrayati, Rosita. (2017). Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi. Lentera Hukum, Vol.4, (No.1),pp.1-18. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.5267
  16. Irawati, Rusda., & Carollina, Dini Arimbi. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Operator Pada PT Giken Precision Indonesia. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis,Vol.5,(No.1),pp.51-58. https://doi.org/10.35314/inovbiz.v5i1.171
  17. Irianto, Prima Satya., & Ispriyarso, Budi. (2016). Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Di Perbankan. Law Reform, Vol.12, (No.2), pp.240-255, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v12i2.15877
  18. Isnantiana, Nur I. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina, Vol.18,(No.2),p.54. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920
  19. Jilan, Sausan., Febriyanti, Delvina., Nur Kh Z, Angelia., Putri, Chintya., & Mulyani, Sri. (2025). Kesejahteraan Hakim dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Integritas Hukum. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kentemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat,Vol.3,(No.1),pp.1-15. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/804
  20. Karsudin, Karsudin., & Cahyaningtyas, Irma. (2021). Government Policy on Child Crime through the Concept of Diversion as a Solution amid the Spread of Covid-19. Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol.5, (No.2),pp.1-18. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.49914
  21. Kartika, Moh E. (2016). Hukum Yang Berkeadilan: Pembentukan Hukum oleh Hakim. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Vol.4, (No.3),pp.383–395. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v4i3.410
  22. Kim, Yee Kyoung., & Oh, Jun Byoung. (2017). Examination Workloads, Grant Decision Bias and Examination Quality of Patent Office. Research Policy, Vol.46, (No.5), pp.1005-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.007
  23. Kolkman, Daan., Bex, Floris., Narayan, Nitin., & Put, Manuella van der. (2024). Justitia Ex Machina: The Impact Of An AI System On Legal Decision-Making And Discretionary Authority. Big Data & Society, Vol.11, (No.2),pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 20539517241255101
  24. Lestari, Mega Monika., Nurwandi, Andri., Umami, Yurissa., Sirait, Irmayani., Khomsi, Yulfiza. (2024). Beban Kerja Dan Stres Pada Profesi Hakim: (Studi Kasus Perkara Tahun 2020 Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Agung). Mizanuna: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Vol.2,(No.1),pp.45-58. https://doi.org/10.59166/mizanuna.v2i1.139
  25. Masyhudi, M. (2019). Membangun Sistem Integritas Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol.26, (No.1),pp.44–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art3
  26. Meliala, Nefa C. (2020). Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) : Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Vol.8, (No.3),pp.551–568. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.820
  27. Muhdlor, Ahmad Z. (2012). Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.189-206. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.189-206
  28. Muksin, Muchlas Rastra Samara., & Rochaeti, Nur. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Keterangan Ahli Kedokteran Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,Vol.2,(No.3),pp.343–358. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.343-358
  29. Mulkan, H. (2021). Peranan Hakim Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Vol.16, (No.2), pp.305-319. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4118
  30. Nabawi, R. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Manegio: Jurnal Magister Manajemen,Vol.2,(No.2),pp.170-183. https://doi.org/10.30596/maneggio.v2i2.3667
  31. Pudjiastuti, D. (2023). Penerapan Prinsip Akuntabilitas dalam Independensi Hakim di Indonesia. Res Nullius Law Journal, Vol.5,(No.2),pp.112–122. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v5i2.9430
  32. Putrijanti, A. (2020). Judicial Activism in Judge's Verdict to Law Enforcement of Environment. E3S Web of Conferences, Vol.202, Article 03018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020203018
  33. Putrijanti, Aju., & Sulistyawan, Aditya Yuli. (2023). Green Court Towards Ecojustice. E3S Web of Conferences, Vol.448, Article 03058. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803058
  34. Rasjid, Sukmawaty., Ismail, Imran., & Juharni, Juharni. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Remunerasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Pengadilan Militer II-16 Makassar. Paradigma Journal of Administration, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.39–45. https://doi.org/10.35965/pja.v1i2.3885
  35. Rizani, Rasyid., Hasan, Ahmadi., & Umar, Masyitah. (2023). Integrasi Keadilan Moral, Keadilan Hukum, dan Keadilan Sosial dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, Vol.1,(No.4),pp.567–583. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.179
  36. Rayfindratama, Alva D. (2023). Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Di Pengadilan. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409
  37. Satriawan, Iwan., & Lailam, Tanto. (2021). Implikasi Mekanisme Seleksi Terhadap Independensi Dan Integritas Hakim Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Vol.9, (No.1), pp. 112–138. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.871
  38. Shen, Jinlu., Zhou, Xiangyou., Wu, Wei., Wang, Liang., & Chen, Zheying. (2023). Worldwide Overview and Country Differences in Metaverse Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, Vol.15, (No.4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043541
  39. Sonata, Depri L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.8, (No.1), pp.15-35. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
  40. Sumardiana, Benny., Pujiyono, Pujiyono., & Cahyaningtyas, Irma. (2024). Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Prejudication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol.8, (No.2), pp.1089-1116. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744
  41. Sunaryo, S. (2022). The Overlapping Consensus in the Indonesian Constitution and Its Challenges, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.19, (No.1),pp.1-22. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911
  42. Suryoutomo, Markus., Mariyam, Siti., & Satria, Adhi Putra. (2022). Koherensi Putusan Hakim Dalam Pembuktian Ganti Rugi Imateriel Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.4,(No.1),pp.133–149. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.139-144
  43. Yang, Li., Yi, Junlin., & Peng, Hui. (2021). Big-Data Measurement-Model Research about Judges’ Actual Workload in China. Asian Journal of Law and Society, Vol.7, (No.3), pp.541-560. doi: 10.1017/als.2019.31
  44. Roring, Yehezkiel., Pontoh, James Vinsensius L., & Baureh, Mody Gregorian. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Perbedaan Putusan Hakim Pada Setiap Tingkatan Peradilan Di Indonesia. Skripsi: Universitas Katolik De La Salle
  45. Bawas Mahkamah Agung. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Bawas MA Tahun 2021-2022. Jakarta: Bawas Mahkamah Agung
  46. Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung
  47. Kumparan News. (2023). Putusan PN Jakpus Kabulkan Nikah Beda Agama Picu Polemik. Retrieved from from https://kumparan.com/ kumparannews/putusan-pn-jakpus-kabulkan-nikah-beda-agama-picu-polemik-20iKWNNTzhL
  48. Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW). (2011). Tertangkap Tangan sedang Terima Suap. Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/ id/article/tertangkap-tangan-sedang-terima-suap

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.