DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpa.v5i1.15355

Assessment of Measured and Calculated Dose Rate of Co-60 Teletherapy Machine: 06 Years’ Experience at NORIN Nawabshah, Pakistan

*Muhammad Waqar orcid  -  Department of Medical Physics, Nuclear Medicine oncology and Radiotherapy Institute of nawabshah (NORIN), Sindh, Pakistan
Touqir Ahmad Afridi  -  Department of Medical Physics, Nuclear Medicine oncology and Radiotherapy Institute of nawabshah (NORIN), Sindh, Pakistan
Quratulain Soomro  -  Department of Medical Physics, Nuclear Medicine oncology and Radiotherapy Institute of nawabshah (NORIN), Sindh, Pakistan
Muhammad Shahban  -  Medical Physics Division, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital Islamabad (NORI), Islamabad, Pakistan
Received: 29 Jul 2022; Revised: 16 Sep 2022; Accepted: 30 Sep 2022; Available online: 30 Nov 2022; Published: 29 Nov 2022.

Citation Format:
Abstract

It is essential to determine the absolute output dose of Co-60 source in the radiation treatment periodically. It is because overdosage may cause radiation hazards whereas under dosage may lead to the unsatisfactory treatment of cancer. The current study is focused on the consistency of monthly dose output verification of the cobalt-60 Teletherapy unit which should be within ±2% as per international standards. In the present study, the measured and calculated dose rate of the Co-60 teletherapy unit at Nuclear Medicine Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute Nawabshah (NORIN) for the last 6 years is analyzed. The dose measurement was done in water phantom 30×30×30 cm3 at 80 cm Source to Surface Distance with 5cm depth by using calibrated electrometer and PTW ionization chamber. The measured output dose rate obtained by actual dosimetry is within ±2% of the dose rate calculated by the decay method and the deviation lies within the permissible limit as prescribed by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurement (ICRUM)and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The variation in measurements obtained is within the tolerable limits according to standard protocols and codes. Thus, our study shows a homogenous trend in the dose rate of the Co-60 teletherapy machine.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Untitled
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (117KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Medical Physics (Phantom; Teletherapy; Dosimetry; Ionization chamber; Dose rate; IAEA; ICRUM)
Funding: Nil

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Characterization of The Optical Properties of Motor Vehicle Engine Lubricants Using the Light Polarization Method Stokes' Law Approach to Slag Formation Process to Increase the Effectiveness of Cleaning Metal Liquids in Cast Iron Smelting Process Depicting the Underground River Systems in Karst Mountains of Buayan and Ayah Subdistricts Using GGMPlus Data and Springs Distribution More recent articles
  1. I. Kunkler, C. K. Bomford, and I. H. Kunkler, “Effects of radiation on normal tissues,” Walter Miller’s Textb. Radiother., 296–306, (2003)
  2. I. A. E. Agency, "Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities," Int. At. En. Agency, (2006)
  3. K. N. Prasad, W. C. Cole, and G. M. Haase, “Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage,” Br. J. Radiol., 77, 914, 97–99, (2004)
  4. M. M. H. Baba, M. Mohib-ul-Haq, and M. A. A. Khan, “Dosimetric consistency of Co-60 teletherapy unit-a ten years study,” Int. J. Health Sci. (Qassim)., 7, 1, 15, (2013)
  5. G. J. Kutcher et al., “Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40,” Med. Phys., 21, 4, 581–618, (1994)
  6. HPA, “A code of practice for the dosimetry of x‐ray and caesium‐137 and cobalt‐60 gamma‐ray beams,” Phys. Med. Biol., 9, 4, 457–463, (1964)
  7. W. F. Hanson, R. J. Shalek, and P. Kennedy, “Dosimetry quality assurance in the US from the experience of the Radiological Physics Center,” (1991)
  8. D. I. Thwaites, B. J. Mijnheer, and J. A. Mills, “Quality assurance of external beam radiotherapy,” Radiat. Oncol. Phys. a Handb. Teach. students. Vienna Int. At. Energy Agency, 407–450, (2005)
  9. A. Wambersie, J. van Dam, G. Hanks, B. J. Mijnheer, and J. J. Battermann, “What accuracy is needed in dosimetry,” (1994)
  10. D. I. Thwaites, “The significance and impact of dosimetry audits in radiotherapy,” (2010)
  11. A. Brahme, “Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy,” Acta Radiol. Oncol., 23, 5, 379–391, (1984)
  12. W. H. Organization, “Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water,” (2004)
  13. M. S. Huq, “Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water,” (2006)
  14. S. A. Memon et al., “Analysis and verification of percent depth dose and tissue maximum ratio for co-60 gamma ray beam,” Worl. App. Sci. J., 33, 1, 109–113, (2015)
  15. R. D. Praveenkumar, K. P. Santhosh, and A. Augustine, “Estimation of inhomogeneity correction factors for a Co-60 beam using Monte Carlo simulation,” J. Cancer Res. Ther., 7, 3, 308, (2011)
  16. M. Waqar, M. Shahban, Q. Soomro, and M. N. Abro, “Institution-based assessment of cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy in the rural area of Sindh, Pakistan: Five years of data analysis,” Middle East J. Cancer, 9, 3, 217–222, (2018)
  17. M. C. Lizuain, D. Linero, and C. Picon, “Evaluation of codes of practice: IAEA TRS-277, TRS-381, TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 in high photon and electron beams,” (2002)
  18. P. N. R. Authority, “PNRA Regulations on radiation protection (PAK/904),” Islam. Pakistan Nucl. Regul. Athority, (2004)
  19. Gerald J. Kutcher et al., “Aapm Tg 40,” Medical Phys., 21, 4, 581–618, (1994)
  20. S. A. Memon, N. A. Laghari, F. H. Mangi, M. A. Jafri, M. Raza, and M. A. Abbasi, “Dosimetric Conformity of Cobalt-60 (Co 60) Beams.”
  21. N. P. Acharya, T. R. Lamichhane, and B. Jha, “Quality Assurance with Dosimetric Consistency of a Co-60 Teletherapy Unit,” J. Nepal Phys. Soc., 4, 1, 88–92, (2017)
  22. S. A. Memon, A. A. Cheema, N. A. Laghari, and F. H. Mangi, “Dose measurement of cobalt-60 radiotherapy beams in treatment fields,” J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad, 26, 3, 279–282, (2014)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.