skip to main content

J.C. van Leur and the Problematic Origins of “Autonomous” Indonesian History

*Eric Jones  -  Department of History, Northern Illinois University, United States

Citation Format:
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to criticize J.C. van Leur's reputation as a Dutch historian who had been very vocal in criticizing his predecessors regarding Indonesian history. For modern Indonesian historians, van Leur is seen as a pioneer to reverse the perspective of a centric Western perspective to an Indonesian centric point of view. The Western centric point of view places Indonesian history as an extension of the Dutch history in Europe so that it is clear that Indonesian history does not have autonomy. However, van Leur's critique is true for the history of Indonesia during the Dutch colonial period, not for critiques of the pre-colonial period. To critically review van Leur's conception of Indonesia's historical autonomy, this article will take a close look at the intellectual trends that Van Leur responded to. This article argues that van Leur's research is very deductive by making the claim that the picture of the past trading community in Southeast Asia is proving to be misguided. This article finds that one of van Leur's weaknesses is that he conducts historical research that is thesis-driven, not research-based, and his belief in a thesis has prompted him to impose totality on Western categories of Southeast Asian history. The use of Max Weber's model in analyzing history actually makes van Leur's analysis of Southeast Asian history not even fully autonomous
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Autonomous History; Indonesian History; J.C. van Leur; National History

Article Metrics:

  1. Berg, Cornelis Christiaan. 1929. Hoofdlijnen der Javaansche litteratuur-geschiedenis. Inaugural lecture, University of Leiden
  2. Bosch, Frederik David Kan. 1961. “The Problem of the Hindu Colonization of Indonesia.” In Selected Studies in Indonesian Archaeology edited by Bosch, Frederik David Kan. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
  3. Coedès, ‘George. 1964. “Some Problems in the Ancient History of the Hinduized States of Southeast Asia.” Journal of Southeast Asian History 5, no. 2 (September): 1-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20067500
  4. Gomez, Luis and Hiram W. Woodward Jr, eds. 1981. Barabudur: History and Significance of a Buddhist Monument. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press
  5. Krom, Nicolaas Johannes. 1927. Barabudur: Archaeological Description 2 vols. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff
  6. Krom, Nicolaas Johannes. 1931. Hindoe-Javaansche Geschiedenis [Tweede, Herziene Druk]. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff
  7. Mabbett, Ian William. 1977. “The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Historical Sources.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies VIII, no. 2 (September): 143-161
  8. Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra. 1963. Hindu Colonies in the Far East. Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay
  9. Marie Antoinette P. Meilink-Roelofsz. 1962. Asian Trade and European Influence in the Indonesian Archipelago between 1500 and about 1630. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962
  10. Meinsma, ed. 1899. The Babad Tanah Djawi. S'Gravenhage : Martinus Nijhoff
  11. Mookerji, Radhakumud. 1912. Indian Shipping: A History of the Sea-Borne Trade and Maritime Activity of the Indians from the Earliest Times. London: Longmans, Green and Co
  12. Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 1830. The History of Java volume 2. London: John Murray
  13. Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 1836. Geschiedenis van Java. Amsterdam: Gebroeders van Cleef
  14. Rush, James R, ed. 1996. Java: A Travellers’ Anthology. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford UP
  15. Smail, John R. W. 1961. “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia.” Journal of Southeast Asian History 2, no. 2 (July): 72-102
  16. Steensgaard, Niels. 1974. The Asian Trade Revolution of the Seventeenth Century: The East India Companies and the Decline of the Caravan Trade. Chicago: U of Chicago Press
  17. Taylor, Jean Gelman. 1983. “The Assault on Indies Culture, The Enlightenment in Batavia.” In, The Social World of Batavia: European and Eurasian in Dutch Asia, edited by Jean Gelman Taylor. Madison: U of Wisconsin Press
  18. Thorne. 1993. Conquest of Java. Singapore: Periplus
  19. Tracy, James Donald, ed. 1990. The Rise of Merchant Empires: Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World, 1350-1 750. New York: Cambridge UP
  20. Tracy, James Donald, ed. 1991. The Political Economy of Merchant Empires. New York: Cambridge UP
  21. Valentijn, Francois. 1724. Oud en nieuw Oost-Indien. Dordrecht: J. van Braam
  22. van Erp, Theodoor. 1917. “Eenige Mededeelingen betreffende de Beelden van Boroboeder in 1896 geschonken aan Z. M. den Koning van Siam.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 73: 285-310a
  23. van Leur, Jacob Cornelius. 1934. Eenige Beschouwingen Betreffende den Ouden Aziatischen Handel. PhD diss., University of Leiden. Middelburg: Firma G.W. den Boer
  24. van Leur, Jacob Cornelius. 1967. Indonesian Trade and Society: Essays in Asian Social and Economic History. The Hague: W. van Hoeve
  25. Weber, Max. 1976. The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations. London: Western
  26. Wheatley, Paul. 1965. Review of Les États Hindouisés d'Indochine et d'Indonésie by G. Coedès. Paris: Editions E. De Boccard, 1964 (3d. ed.). 494. The Journal of Asian Studies, 24, no. 2: 335-336. doi: 10.2307/2050594
  27. Wheatley, Paul. 1982. “Presidential Address: India Beyond the Ganges-Desultory Reflections on the Origins of Civilization in Southeast Asia.” The Journal of Asian Studies, 42, no. 1: 13-28. doi: 10.2307/2055365

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.