skip to main content

Ideology Movements of Trisakti Trilogy: Remending Maritime Archipelagic as a Concept of Indonesian Unity in the Threat of Democracy and Sovereignty Crisis

*Luthfi Habibullah  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
Bagus Haryono  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
Argyo Demartoto  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Indonesia has great potential in managing its maritime strength. Historical traces have recorded that Nusantara kingdoms succeeded in showing their strength to build geopolitical and global trade routes. Having a geographical structure makes Indonesia pay great attention to the sea. Archipelagic state is not merely interpreted as an archipelagic concept, but it is a state that connects islands to and from a sovereign territory by presenting a national maritime power. Indonesia is expected to be a successor to the maritime nation considered in Southeast Asia and also to play its role in the global geopolitical strategy. National unity must be followed by strong geographical entity. The emergence of the Juanda Declaration as a diplomacy order was to defend the principles of the sovereign island nation of Indonesia. The sea is no longer defined as a separator, but a link and unifying sovereignty. State sovereignty become the foundation of the Trisakti trilogy. Fully sovereign in political, self-sufficient in economic and conforming personality in cultural values are the basis of the foundation. It rejects all forms of new-style imperialism, capitalism and foreign dictation of life value system.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Archipelagic State; Trisakti Ideology; Democracy and Sovereignty Crisis.

Article Metrics:

  1. “Natuna milik RI, Airnya milik RRT?” Kompas, June 15, 2016
  2. Basri, Chaidir. “Wawasan Nusantara sebagai Cara Pandang Bangsa Indonesia.” Master’s thesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2001
  3. Batu, Marianne. 2009. Keamanan Menurut Buzan: Analisis Keamanan Komprehensif. Paris: Group d'Etudes et d'Expertise
  4. Butler, Colin J. 2005, “Strategic Alliance UK”. Journal Strategic Change 14 (Jan-Feb Edition): 20-22
  5. Buzan, B., & Waever, O., and de Wilde, J. 1998. Keamanan: Kerangka Kerja Baru Untuk Analisis. London: Lynne Rienne
  6. Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies inthe Post-Cold War Era. Harrow: Longman
  7. Djalal, Hasyim. 1979. Perjuangan Indonesia di Bidang Hukum Laut. Bandung: Binacipta
  8. Feldt, Peter Roell, and Thiele, D. 2013. Keamanan Maritim – Perspektif untuk Pendekatan yang Komprehensif. Berlin: Institut für Strategie Politik Sicherheits und Wirtschaftsberatung ISPSW
  9. Heywood, A. 2014. Politik, translated by Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  10. Hirst, P. 2004. Perang dan Kekuatan Di Abad Ke-21, translated by Setia Bangun. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  11. Ikhtiari, Richarunia. “Strategi Keamanan Maritim Indonesia dalam Menanggulangi Ancaman Keamanan Non-Tradisional, Studi Kasus: Illegal Fishing Periode Tahun 2005-2010” Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2011
  12. Laksmana, Evan A. 2011. “The enduring strategic trinity: explaining Indonesia’s geopolitical architecture” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 7, no. 1. London: Routledge
  13. Lombard, Denys. 2008. Nusa Jawa : Silang Budaya, Kajian Sejarah Terpadu Bag I: Batas-batas Pembaratan. Jakarta-Paris: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  14. Mahan, A.T., 1989. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660-1793, Boston: Little Brown and Company
  15. Nugroho, Irawan Djoko. 2011. Majapahit Peradaban Maritim: Ketika Nusantara Menjadi Pengendali Pelabuhan Dunia. Jakarta: Yayasan Suluh Nuswantara Bakti
  16. Octavian, Amaruli and Yulianto, Bayu. 2014. Budaya, Identitas & Masalah Keamanan Maritim. Jakarta: Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia
  17. Oegroseno, Arif Havas. 2012. “Diplomasi Perbatasan Maritim: Garis Kehidupan Indonesia”. In Perbatasan Diplomasi Maritim, edited by Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore. 31-33. Leiden [etc.]: Nijhoff
  18. Palma, Mary Ann E. 2009. “Tanggapan Hukum dan Politik terhadap Tantangan Keamanan Maritim di Selat Malaka dan Singapura.” Konsorsium Kanada untuk Keamanan Asia Pasifik (CANCAPS) Papier No. 31
  19. Prabowo, Dadang. 1984. Pembahasan Pemikiran Soekarno Tentang Kemerdekaan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada
  20. R Kurniaty, Ikaningtyas, Ruslijanto, P. A. 2018. “Analysis on traditional fishing grounds in Indonesia`s Natuna Waters under International Law.” IOP Conference Series: Earth Environment Science 137(012039): 1-6. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/137/1/012039
  21. Rahardjo, Imam and Sudarso, Suko, ed. 2010. Bung Karno Masalah Pertahanan-Keamanan. Jakarta: Grasindo
  22. Rochwulaningsih, Yety, et al. 2019. “Marine Policy Basis of Indonesia as a Maritime State: The Importance of Integrated Economy.” Marine Policy 108: 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103602
  23. Suroyo, Djulianti, et al. 2007. Sejarah Maritim Indonesia I Menelusuri Jiwa Bahari Bangsa Indonesia Hingga Abad ke-17. Semarang: Penerbit Jeda
  24. Thies, Cameron G. 2002. "Sebuah Panduan Pragmatis untuk Analisis Sejarah Kualitatif dalam Studi jika Hubungan Internasional". Perspektif Studi Internasional
  25. Thuatail, Gearoid O. 1998. “Introduction”, In Geopolitics Reader. New York: Routledge
  26. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 1985 Tentang Pengesahan UNCLOS 1982
  27. van Leur, J. C. and Verhoven, F. R. J. 1974. Teori Mahan dan Sejarah Kepulauan Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhratara

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.