Optimasi Kualitas Citra Radiografi Abdomen Berdasarkan Body Mass Index dan Tegangan Tabung pada Computed Radiography

*Siti Rosidah  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ari Soewondo  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Mateus Sakundarno Adi  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 30 Sep 2019; Published: 27 Feb 2020.
Open Access License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: ID-ID
Statistics: 133 570
Abstract

Background: Computed Radiography is a modality of radiographic processing that has wide-exposure latitude. So that in radiographic examination with CR modality is less concerned with the accuracy of the exposure factor especially in the use of tube voltage that can affect the image quality. Image quality determines the accuracy of diagnosis of an illness. Abdominal examination is often done in the radiological installation of Hospital, with different patient conditions especially in Body Mass Index the use of tube voltages tends to vary so as to affect the quality of radiograph and received dose Patients

Methods: This type of research is analytical observational research with cross sectional research draft. Samples in research amounted to 108 distributed in each group of Body mass Index (underweight, normal, overweight) respectively 36 samples. Each body mass index group sample is taken from the use of tube voltages that are often used in RS 75 kV, 80kV, 85 kV and 90 kV respectively as much as 9. Assessments include the value of the exposure index, Noise and anatomical information. Statistical data analysis with Spearman test and univariat.

Result: There is a significant connection between the use of cylinder voltage with an index exposure, noise and anatomical imagery

Conclusion : Optimised tube voltage for Body Mass index Under 75 kV, normal BMI 80 kV and BMI over 85 kV

Keywords: Computed Radiography; Tube Voltage; Body Mass Index.

Article Metrics:

  1. Adejoh, T., Ewuzie, O.C., Ogbonna, J.K., Nwefuru, S.O. and Onuegbu, N.C. (2016) A Derived Exposure Chart for Computed Radiography in a Negroid Population. Health, 8, 953-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2016.810098
  2. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2009. An Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography. Retrieved from http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_116.pdf
  3. Ballinger, Philip W. dan Eugene D, Frank. 2003. Merril’s Atlas of Radiographich positions and Radiologic Prosedures, Tenth Edition, Volome three. Saint Louis : Mosby
  4. Bontranger, Knneth L. dan John P. Lampignano. 2010. Textbook of Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomy, Seventh Edition. Saint Louis : Mosby.
  5. Bontranger, Knneth L. dan John P. Lampignano. 2014. Textbook of Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomy, Eight Edition. Saint Louis : Mosby.
  6. Bushong, Steward C. 2013. Radiologic Science for Technologists, Physics, Biology and Protection. Saint Louis : Mosby.
  7. Carestream, H. 2010. The Concept of Exposure Index For Carestream Directview System. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/X441S/AppData/Local/Temp/exposure-whitePaper- Eric
  8. Fahmi Arif, Pengaruh Faktor Eksposi Pada Pemerikasaan Abdomen Terhadap Kualitas Radiograf Dan Paparan Radiasi Menggunakan Computed Radiography, Journal Undip, Berkala Fisika ISSN : 1410 – 9662 Vol 11 , No.4, Oktober 2008 hal 109-118 M1-461.pdf diakses pada tanggal : 07 September 2017
  9. Hiswara, Eri, 2015, Buku Pintar Proteksi Dan Keselamatan Radiasi Di Rumah Sakit, BATAN Press : Jakarta
  10. Jacqueline Gallet, The Concept of Exposure Index For Carestream Irectview Systems, Carestream Health, Inc.U.S.A.2010
  11. Kwasi Ofori, Relationship between Patient Anatomical Thickness and Radiographic Exposure Factors for Selected Radiologic Examinations, Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing ,ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal,Vol.23, 2016
  12. Mervyn, Chohen D, Richard M, Jeanne H, Walter H, Paul B, dan Bruce A. 2011. A Comparison Study of Radiographic Exposure for Neonatal Chest Radiographs at 4 Academic Hospitals. American Journal Roentgenology.
  13. Moore CS, Wood TJ, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20130077.
  14. Papp, J. 2011. Quality Management In The Imaging Sciences, Fourth Edition. Saint Louis : Mosby.
  15. Rochmayanti Dwi, Implementation of exposure index for optimize image quality and patient dose estimation with computed radiography (a clinical study of adult posteroanterior chest and anteroposterior abdomen radiography), Journal Physic Conference Series, 2019
  16. Sisnawati. 2015. Pengaruh Variasi kV Terhadap Noise Citra Lumbosacral Lateral Pada Penggunaan Computer Radiography (Studi Eksperimen Pada Phantom). Semarang : Prodi D III Teknik Radiodiagnostik dan Radioterapi Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang.
  17. Steven D, Bruce R, Lois J, dan Bruce K. 2012. New Exposure Indicators for Digital Radiography Simplified for Radiologists and Technologists. American Journal Roentgenology.
  18. Ursula Mothiram, Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 60 (2013) 115–122